View Item 

Show simple item record

A Participatory, Mixed Methods Approach to Define and Measure Partnership Synergy in Long- standing Equity- focused CBPR Partnerships

dc.contributor.authorCoombe, Chris M.
dc.contributor.authorChandanabhumma, P. Paul
dc.contributor.authorBhardwaj, Prachi
dc.contributor.authorBrush, Barbara L.
dc.contributor.authorGreene‐moton, Ella
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Megan
dc.contributor.authorLachance, Laurie
dc.contributor.authorLee, S.Y. Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMeisenheimer, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorMinkler, Meredith
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad, Michael
dc.contributor.authorReyes, Angela G.
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorWilson‐powers, Eliza
dc.contributor.authorIsrael, Barbara A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T18:44:29Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2021-01-05T18:44:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.citationCoombe, Chris M.; Chandanabhumma, P. Paul; Bhardwaj, Prachi; Brush, Barbara L.; Greene‐moton, Ella ; Jensen, Megan; Lachance, Laurie; Lee, S.Y. Daniel; Meisenheimer, Melanie; Minkler, Meredith; Muhammad, Michael; Reyes, Angela G.; Rowe, Zachary; Wilson‐powers, Eliza ; Israel, Barbara A. (2020). "A Participatory, Mixed Methods Approach to Define and Measure Partnership Synergy in Long- standing Equity- focused CBPR Partnerships." American Journal of Community Psychology 66(3-4): 427-438.
dc.identifier.issn0091-0562
dc.identifier.issn1573-2770
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163783
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding what contributes to success of community- based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships is essential to ensuring their effectiveness in addressing health disparities and health inequities. Synergy, the concept of accomplishing more together than separately, is central to partnership effectiveness. However, synergy specific to long- standing, equity- focused CBPR partnerships has not been closely examined. To address this, we defined and developed measures of partnership synergy as one dimension of a participatory mixed methods study, Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS), to develop a validated instrument to measure success in long- standing CBPR partnerships. Framed by a conceptual model and scoping literature review, we conducted in- depth interviews with a national panel of academic and community experts in CBPR and equity to develop partnership synergy measures. Items were refined through an iterative process, including a three- stage Delphi process, comparison with existing measures, cognitive interviews, and pilot testing. Seven questionnaire items were developed to measure synergy arising from equitable partnerships bringing together diverse partners across power differences to promote equity. Defining and measuring synergy in the context of long- standing partnership success is central to understanding the role of synergy in collaborative approaches to research and action and can strengthen CBPR partnerships to promote healthy communities and advance health equity.HighlightsSynergy- accomplishing more together than alone- is central to effective collaborative partnerships.Measures of synergy specific to long- standing equity- focused CBPR partnerships are lacking.We developed a 7- item measure integrating knowledge from community- academic CBPR and equity experts.Evaluating synergy can strengthen CBPR partnership effectiveness to address health inequities.Fostering synergy will enhance CBPR partnership success to promote community health and equity.
dc.publisherJessica Kingsley
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherHealth disparities
dc.subject.otherEvaluation
dc.subject.otherMeasurement in mixed methods
dc.subject.otherSynergy
dc.subject.otherHealth equity
dc.subject.otherCommunity- based participatory research
dc.titleA Participatory, Mixed Methods Approach to Define and Measure Partnership Synergy in Long- standing Equity- focused CBPR Partnerships
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163783/1/ajcp12447_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163783/2/ajcp12447.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajcp.12447
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOetzel, J., Duran, B., Sussman, A., Pearson, C., Magarati, M., Khodyakov, D., & Wallerstein, N. ( 2018 ). Evaluation of CBPR partnerships and outcomes: Lessons and tools from the Research for Improved Health study. In N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J. Oetzel & M. Minkler (Eds.), Community- based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity ( 3rd edn, pp. 237 - 250 ). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronfenbrenner, U. ( 1992 ). Ecological systems theory. Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187 - 249 ). London: Jessica Kingsley.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrush, B. L., Mentz, G., Jensen, M., Jacobs, B., Saylor, K. M., Rowe, Z., - ¦ & Lachance, L. ( 2019 ). Success in long- standing community- based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships: A scoping literature review. Health Education and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119882989.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenter for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health ( 2002 ). Partnership Self- Assessment Tool- Questionnaire. Available from: https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10214/3129/Partnership_Self- Assessment_Tool- Questionnaire_complete.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [last accessed October 07, 2019].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharmaz, K. ( 2014 ). Constructing grounded theory ( 2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorbin, J., & Strauss, A. ( 2015 ). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques ( 4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickson, E., Magarati, M., Boursaw, B., Oetzel, J., Devia, C., Ortiz, K., & Wallerstein, N. ( 2019 ). Characteristics and practices within research partnerships addressing health and social equity. Nursing Research, 69, 51 - 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreire, P. ( 1973 ). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, B. ( 1989 ). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelmer- Hirschberg, O. ( 1967 ). Analysis of the future: The Delphi Method [Product Page]. Available from: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3558.html [last accessed October 1 2018]
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. ( 2013 ). Introduction to methods for CBPR for health. In B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz & E. A. Parker (Eds.), Methods for community- based participatory research for health ( 2nd edn, pp. 4 - 37 ). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael, B. A., Lachance, L., Coombe, C. M., Lee, S. Y. D., Jensen, M., Wilson- Powers, E., - ¦ & Brush, B. L. ( 2020 ). Measurement approaches to partnership success: Theory and methods for measuring success in long- standing CBPR partnerships. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 14, 129 - 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael, B. A., Lantz, P. M., McGranaghan, R., Guzman, J. R., Lichtenstein, R., & Rowe, Z. ( 2013 ). Documentation and evaluation of CBPR partnerships: The use of in- depth interviews and closed ended questionnaires. In B. A. Israel, E. Eng, A. J. Schulz & E. A. Parker (Eds.), Methods for community- based participatory research for health ( 2nd edn, pp. 369 - 398 ). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Coombe, C., Parker, E. A., Reyes, A. G., Rowe, Z., & Lichtenstein, R. ( 2019 ). Community- based participatory research: An approach to research in the urban context. In C. Ettman, S. Galea & D. Vlahov (Eds.), Urban health. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. ( 1998 ). Review of community- based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173 - 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJagosh, J., Macaulay, A. C., Pluye, P., Salsberg, J., Bush, P. L., Henderson, J., - ¦ & Greenhalgh, T. ( 2012 ). Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: Implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 90, 311 - 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, J., & Barry, M. M. ( 2011a ). Exploring the relationship between synergy and partnership functioning factors in health promotion partnerships. Health Promotion International, 26, 408 - 420.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, J., & Barry, M. M. ( 2011b ). Developing a scale to measure synergy in health promotion partnerships. Global Health Promotion, 18, 36 - 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKastelic, S. L., Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., & Oetzel, J. G. ( 2018 ). Socio- ecological framework for CBPR: Development and testing of a model. In N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J. Oetzel, & M. Minkler (Eds.), Community- based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity ( 3rd edn, pp. 77 - 94 ). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhodyakov, D., Stockdale, S., Jones, F., Ohito, E., Jones, A., Lizaola, E., & Mango, J. ( 2011 ). An exploration of the effect of community engagement in research on perceived outcomes of partnered mental health services projects. Society and Mental Health, 1, 185 - 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. ( 2001 ). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79, 179 - 205, III- IV.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaguire, P. ( 2001 ). Uneven ground: Feminism and action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 56 - 69 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinkler, M. ( 2005 ). Community- based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82 ( Suppl. 2 ), ii3 - ii12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOetzel, J., Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Sanchez- Youngman, S., Nguyen, T., Woo, K., - ¦ & Alegria, M. ( 2018 ). Impact of participatory health research: A test of the CBPR conceptual model: pathways to outcomes within community- academic partnerships. Biomedical Research International. Article ID 7281405. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7281405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOetzel, J., Zhou, C., Duran, B., Pearson, C., Magarati, M., Lucero, J., - ¦ & Villegas, M. ( 2015 ). Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community- based participatory research conceptual model. American Journal of Health Promotion, 29, e188 - e202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulz, A., Israel, B. A., & Lantz, P. ( 2003 ). Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community- based participatory research partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 249 - 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, L. T. ( 1999 ). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSofaer, S. ( 2000 ). Working together, moving ahead: A manual to support effective community health coalitions. New York: City University of New York, Baruch College, School of Public Affairs.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceViswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., - ¦ & Whitener, L. ( 2004 ). Community- based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/cbprsum.htm.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallerstein, N., & Duran, B. ( 2018 ). Theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. In N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J. Oetzel & M. Minkler (Eds.), Community- based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity ( 3rd edn, pp. 17 - 29 ). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard, M., Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., Rice, K., Martenies, S. E., & Markarian, E. ( 2018 ). A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community- based participatory research partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 70, 25 - 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss, E. S., Anderson, R. M., & Lasker, R. D. ( 2002 ). Making the most of collaboration: Exploring the relationship between partnership synergy and partnership functioning. Health Education and Behavior, 29, 683 - 698.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillis, G. B. ( 2005 ). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. ( 1992 ). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 707 - 727.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajcp12447_am.pdf
Size:
320.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajcp12447.pdf
Size:
141.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.