Family availability and its influence on informal and formal care used by adults with dementia in the United States
dc.contributor.author | Choi, HwaJung | |
dc.contributor.author | Heisler, Michele | |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, Tsai‐chin | |
dc.contributor.author | Connell, Cathleen M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-05T18:46:42Z | |
dc.date.available | WITHHELD_12_MONTHS | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-05T18:46:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Choi, HwaJung; Heisler, Michele; Cho, Tsai‐chin ; Connell, Cathleen M (2020). "Family availability and its influence on informal and formal care used by adults with dementia in the United States." Alzheimer’s & Dementia 16: n/a-n/a. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1552-5260 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1552-5279 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163874 | |
dc.description.abstract | BackgroundPotential family availability may have a profound impact on the level of informal care received by older adults with dementia and hence formal care utilization including institutional care.MethodFrom a nationally representative study of older adults, the analysis sample included 4,954 adults (9,363 year- persons) aged 55+ who had dementia during the years of 2002- 2014. We provided national estimates of the family availability of people with dementia. And, the adjusted, predicted probability of receiving informal and formal care was estimated separately by their spouse and adult child availability using multivariable, logistic regressions. Demographic, socioeconomic, and health measures were included in the adjusted models.ResultOnly 23% of adults with dementia had a non- disabled spouse, but 66% had an adult child living less than 10 miles. There were substantial variations in family availability across demographic and socioeconomic groups. For example, 29% of non- Hispanic blacks vs. 40% of other racial/ethnic groups (OR=0.63; 95% CI 0.53- 0.76) had a spouse. Only 16% of the bottom quartile in the wealth distribution had a spouse but 61% of the top quartile did (OR=0.13; 95% CI 0.11- 0.15). However, the greater share of non- Hispanic blacks vs. non- Hispanic whites had a coresident adult child (OR=2.07; 95% CI 1.70- 2.50) and a non- employed adult child (OR=1.45; 95% CI 1.18- 1.79). Hispanics had the greatest family availability - both spouse and child availability.Having a spouse substantially increased the adjusted probability of receiving informal care, from 47% to 64% (OR=1.96; 95% CI 1.61- 2.40), but reduced that of receiving formal care from 47% to 33% (OR=0.54; 95% CI 0.46- 0.64) including institutional care from 30% to 18% (OR=0.50; 95% CI 0.39- 0.64). Having a coresident child substantially increased the adjusted probability of receiving informal care, from 47% to 71% (OR=2.80; 95% CI 2.18- 3.59), and lowered that of receiving formal care, from 46% to 24% (OR=0.37; 95% CI 0.29- 0.48).ConclusionThe presence of spouse and a co- resident adult child may significantly reduce the use of formal care - including institutional care - by adults with dementia in the US. Intervention programs that promote family care however should consider substantial heterogeneity in potential family availability across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.title | Family availability and its influence on informal and formal care used by adults with dementia in the United States | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Neurology and Neurosciences | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163874/1/alz037091.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/alz.037091 | |
dc.identifier.source | Alzheimer’s & Dementia | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.