View Item 

Show simple item record

Comparison of a web‐push survey research protocol with a mailed paper and pencil protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel survey
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Megan E.
dc.contributor.authorCouper, Mick P.
dc.contributor.authorParks, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorLaetz, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorSchulenberg, John E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T18:47:45Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2021-01-05T18:47:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.citationPatrick, Megan E.; Couper, Mick P.; Parks, Michael J.; Laetz, Virginia; Schulenberg, John E. (2021). "Comparison of a web‐push survey research protocol with a mailed paper and pencil protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel survey." Addiction 116(1): 191-199.
dc.identifier.issn0965-2140
dc.identifier.issn1360-0443
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163912
dc.description.abstractAimsThe experiment tested the effects of a web‐push survey research protocol, compared with the standard mailed paper‐and‐pencil protocol, among young adults aged 19–30 years in the ‘Monitoring the Future’ (MTF) longitudinal study.Design, Setting and ParticipantsThe US‐based MTF study has measured substance use trends among young adults in panel samples followed biennially, using consistent mailed survey procedures from 1977 to 2017. In 2018, young adult participants in the MTF longitudinal component scheduled to be surveyed at ages 19–30 in 2018 (from high school senior cohorts of 2006–17, n = 14 709) were randomly assigned to receive the standard mail/paper survey procedures or new web‐push procedures.MeasurementsPrimary outcomes were responding to the survey and prevalence estimates for past 30‐day use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana and illicit drugs.FindingsThe web‐push response rate was 39.07% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 37.889, 40.258]; this was significantly better than the standard MTF response rate of 35.12% (95% CI = 33.964, 36.285). After adjusting for covariates, the web‐push condition was associated with a 19% increase in the odds of responding compared with standard MTF (adjusted odds ratio = 1.188; 95% CI = 1.096, 1.287). Substance use prevalence estimates were very similar and differences became negligible when using attrition weights and controlling for socio‐demographic characteristics.ConclusionsThe web‐push protocol produced a higher response rate than the mailed pencil and paper protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study, without substantially affecting estimates of substance use once attrition weights and socio‐demographic variables were factored in.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.subject.otherlongitudinal
dc.subject.otherweb‐based survey
dc.subject.othersurvey research
dc.subject.othersubstance use estimates
dc.subject.otherresponse rate
dc.subject.otherpaper survey
dc.titleComparison of a web‐push survey research protocol with a mailed paper and pencil protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel survey
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163912/1/add15158_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163912/2/add15158.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/add.15158
dc.identifier.sourceAddiction
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeeter S., Kennedy C., Dimock M., Best J., Craighill P. Gauging the impact of growing nonresponse on estimates from a national RDD telephone survey. Public Opin Q 2006; 70: 759 – 779.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulenberg J. E., Johnston L. D., O’Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Miech R. A., Patrick M. E. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2018: Volume II, College Students and Adults Ages 19–60. Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick M. E., Terry‐McElrath Y. M., Lanza S. T., Jager J., Schulenberg J. E., O’Malley P. M. Shifting age of peak binge drinking prevalence: historical changes in normative trajectories among young adults aged 18 to 30. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2019; 43: 287 – 298.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBachman JG, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE, Miech RA. The Monitoring the Future Project After Four Decades: Design and Procedures (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper no. 82). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan; 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiech R., Johnston L. D., O’Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Schulenberg J. E., Patrick M. E. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2018. Secondary school students, vol. 1. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan; 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick M. E., Couper M. P., Jang B. J., Laetz V., Schulenberg J. E., O’Malley P. M., et al. Building on a Sequential Mixed‐Mode Research Design in the Monitoring The Future Study; In review.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick M. E., Couper M. P., Jang B. J., Laetz V., Schulenberg J. E., Johnston L. D. et al. Two‐year follow‐up of a sequential mixed‐mode experiment in the U.S. national monitoring the future study. Surv Pract 2019; 12. doi: 10.29115/SP‐2019‐0003.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick M. E., Couper M. P., Laetz V. B., Schulenberg J. E., O’Malley P. M., Johnston L. D., et al. A sequential mixed‐mode experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the future study. J Surv Stat Methodol 2018; 6: 72 – 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalea S., Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17: 643 – 653.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTolonen H., Helakorpi S., Talala K., Helasoja V., Martelin T., Prättälä R. 25‐year trends and socio‐demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol 2006; 21: 409 – 415.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTourangeau R., Conrad F. G., Couper M. P. The Science of Web Surveys. The Science of Web Surveys. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 1995; 57: 289 – 300.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerry‐McElrath Y. M., O’Malley P. M., Johnston L. D., Bray B. C., Patrick M. E., Schulenberg J. E. Longitudinal patterns of marijuana use across ages 18–50 in a US national sample: a descriptive examination of predictors and health correlates of repeated measures latent class membership. Drug Alcohol Depend 2017; 171: 70 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerry‐McElrath Y. M., Patrick M. E. Intoxication and binge and high‐intensity drinking among US young adults in their mid‐20s. Subst Abuse 2016; 37: 597 – 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatrick M. E., Terry‐McElrath Y. M., Lee C. M., Schulenberg J. E. Simultaneous alcohol and marijuana use among underage young adults in the United States. Addict Behav 2019; 88: 77 – 81.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
add15158_am.pdf
Size:
436.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
add15158.pdf
Size:
547.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.