Show simple item record

Examination of a composite walking measure to inform physical activity guidelines for improving or maintaining cognitive functioning

dc.contributor.authorDesai, Pankaja
dc.contributor.authorHalloway, Shannon
dc.contributor.authorDhana, Klodian
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Thomas Monroe
dc.contributor.authorde Leon, Carlos Mendes
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Denis A
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Martha Clare
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T18:48:27Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2021-01-05T18:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.citationDesai, Pankaja; Halloway, Shannon; Dhana, Klodian; Holland, Thomas Monroe; de Leon, Carlos Mendes; Evans, Denis A; Morris, Martha Clare (2020). "Examination of a composite walking measure to inform physical activity guidelines for improving or maintaining cognitive functioning." Alzheimer’s & Dementia 16: n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1552-5260
dc.identifier.issn1552-5279
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163936
dc.description.abstractBackgroundFewer than half of all U.S. adults achieve recommended levels of aerobic activity (150 minutes or more at moderate intensity) (CDC, 2013; USDHHS, 2018). Information related to frequency, dose, duration, and intensity of walking needed to positively impact cognitive function in older adults remains unclear in current U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines (Piercey et al., 2018; Paterson et al., 2010). A paucity of studies have been conducted which examine the association between physical activity (PA), much less PA types, and cognitive function, using a longitudinal, population‐based approach with a racially diverse sample, which limits generalizability of existing findings. Self‐report PA measures often evaluate types of walking separately (e.g., walking for exercise, leisure time, occupational, transportation‐related), without considering total effect of all types of walking on cognitive function. A composite walking measure could provide a more comprehensive picture of perceived daily walking. We examine the association between composite walking and cognitive function and perceptual speed among participants in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (CHAP) over time.MethodCHAP is a longitudinal, population‐based study, which examined risk factors of Alzheimer’s Disease and chronic conditions among diverse older adults (Bienas et al., 2003). Data collection included self‐report walking frequency and duration, demographics, chronic conditions, cognitive activities, APOE ϵ4, and cognitive function during three‐year cycles. A composite walking measure was developed. Composite walking was divided into three categories determined by sample size: no walking, < 105 minutes/ week, and >105 minutes/ week of walking. Mixed effects regression analyses were conducted to test the association between walking and cognitive function and perceptual speed.ResultThe sample consists of N=4,320 CHAP participants (Black/ African American: 65%; Female: 65%; Mean Education: 13 years; Mean Age: 75 years). Findings show that composite walking had a statistically significant association with global cognitive function (category 2 β=.0084, p=.0389; category 3 β=.0099, p=.0187) and perceptual speed (category 2 β=.0117, p=.0164; category 3 β=.0162, p=.0013), after controlling for covariates.ConclusionAlthough it is best to follow PA guidelines, walking for lesser than the recommended amount may still be beneficial for cognitive function, which is useful for promotion of PA among sedentary older adults.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleExamination of a composite walking measure to inform physical activity guidelines for improving or maintaining cognitive functioning
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurology and Neurosciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163936/1/alz044064.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/alz.044064
dc.identifier.sourceAlzheimer’s & Dementia
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.