Show simple item record

Multidrug resistant organism predicts ulcer recurrence following surgical management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Brian M.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Wen
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Shiwei
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T18:48:50Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_12_MONTHS
dc.date.available2021-01-05T18:48:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, Brian M.; Ye, Wen; Zhou, Shiwei (2020). "Multidrug resistant organism predicts ulcer recurrence following surgical management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis." International Wound Journal 17(6): 1634-1641.
dc.identifier.issn1742-4801
dc.identifier.issn1742-481X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163950
dc.description.abstractDiabetic foot ulcers commonly precede diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) and once the latter occurs, surgical management is often performed. The presence of osteomyelitis is an independent risk factor for the development of re‐ulceration. We investigated the relationship between causative organisms in osteomyelitis and 1‐year diabetic foot outcomes (re‐ulceration, amputation, and death) following surgical management in an observational cohort of 223 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for available demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. In addition, random forest plots were used to identify microbiologic predictors of 1‐year outcomes. Patients with osteomyelitis managed surgically were younger and exhibited more painful peripheral neuropathy than outpatients with diabetes alone (both P < .0001). Osteomyelitis proximal margin cultures were diverse, at times polymicrobial, and included multidrug‐resistant organisms in 13.9% of the cohort. In patients who underwent surgery, 44.5% experienced a re‐ulceration on the same foot within 12 months of surgery. The presence of multidrug‐resistant organisms on proximal bone culture was found to be a significant predictor of diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in univariate modelling (P < .001) and importance rankings. This is the first study to use prediction modelling to identify a relationship between multidrug‐resistant organisms and diabetic foot ulcer recurrence following DFO.
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othermultidrug‐resistant organisms
dc.subject.otherulcer recurrence
dc.subject.otherdiabetic foot ulcer
dc.subject.otherdiabetic foot osteomyelitis
dc.subject.otheramputation
dc.titleMultidrug resistant organism predicts ulcer recurrence following surgical management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163950/1/iwj13439_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163950/2/iwj13439.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iwj.13439
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Wound Journal
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnvarinejad M, Pouladfar G, Japoni A, et al. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility of the microorganisms isolated from diabetic foot infections in Nemazee hospital. South Iran J Pathogens. 2015; 2015: 1 ‐ 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMantey I, Hill R, Foster A, Wilson S, Wade J, Edmonds M. Infection of foot ulcers with Staphylococcus aureus associated with increased mortality in diabetic patients. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000; 3: 288 ‐ 290.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaltoglu N, Ergonul O, Tulek N, et al. Influence of multidrug resistant organisms on the outcome of diabetic foot infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2018; 70: 10 ‐ 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVardakas KZ, Horianopoulou M, Falagas ME. Factors associated with treatment failure in patients with diabetic foot infections: an analysis of data from randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008; 80 ( 3 ): 344 ‐ 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmstrong DG, Boulton AJ, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376 ( 24 ): 2367 ‐ 2375.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllahabadi S, Haroun KB, Musher DM, Lipsky BA, Barshes NR. Consensus on surgical aspects of managing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Diabetic Foot Ankle. 2016; 7 ( 1 ): 30079.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipsky BA, Aragon‐Sanchez J, Diggle M, et al. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016; 32 ( Suppl 1 ): 45 ‐ 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills JL Sr, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59 ( 1 ): 220 ‐ 34.e2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt BM, McHugh JB, Patel RM, Wrobel JS. Prospective analysis of surgical bone margins after partial foot amputation in diabetic patients admitted with moderate to severe foot infections. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019; 12 ( 2 ): 131 ‐ 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtway S, Nerone VS, Springer KD, Woodruff DM. Rate of residual osteomyelitis after partial foot amputation in diabetic patients: a standardized method for evaluating bone margins with intraoperative culture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012; 51 ( 6 ): 749 ‐ 752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeiss LS, Li Y, Hora I, Albright A, Rolka D, Gregg EW. Resurgence of diabetes‐related nontraumatic lower‐extremity amputation in the young and middle‐aged adult US population. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42 ( 1 ): 50 ‐ 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiurato L, Meloni M, Izzo V, Uccioli L. Osteomyelitis in diabetic foot: a comprehensive overview. World J Diabetes. 2017; 8 ( 4 ): 135 ‐ 142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJneid J, Lavigne J, La Scola B, Cassir N. The diabetic foot microbiota: a review. Human Microbiome J. 2017; 5: 1 ‐ 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCitron DM, Goldstein EJ, Merriam CV, Lipsky BA, Abramson MA. Bacteriology of moderate‐to‐severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45 ( 9 ): 2819 ‐ 2828.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacDonald YGD, Hait H, Lipsky B, Zasloff M, Holroyd K. Microbiological profile of infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med. 2002; 19 ( 12 ): 1032 ‐ 1034.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerim MC, Borges JC, Celeste SRC, et al. Aerobic bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance in patients with diabetic foot infections. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015; 48 ( 5 ): 546 ‐ 554.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunyach‐Remy C, Ngba Essebe C, Sotto A, Lavigne J‐P. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and diabetic foot ulcers: role in pathogenesis and interest in diagnosis. Toxins. 2016; 8 ( 7 ): 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKandemir Ö, Akbay E, Şahin E, Milcan A, Gen R. Risk factors for infection of the diabetic foot with multi‐antibiotic resistant microorganisms. J Infect. 2007; 54 ( 5 ): 439 ‐ 445.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGardiner M, Vicaretti M, Sparks J, et al. A longitudinal study of the diabetic skin and wound microbiome. PeerJ. 2017; 5: e3543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoesche M, Gardner SE, Kalan L, et al. Temporal stability in chronic wound microbiota is associated with poor healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2017; 137 ( 1 ): 237 ‐ 244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard CL, Sanchez CJ Jr, Pollot BE, et al. Soluble factors from biofilms of wound pathogens modulate human bone marrow‐derived stromal cell differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, and cytokine secretion. BMC Microbiol. 2015; 15 ( 1 ): 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMody L, Washer LL, Kaye KS, et al. Multidrug‐resistant organisms in hospitals: what is on patient hands and in their rooms? Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 69 ( 11 ): 1837 ‐ 1844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrisologo PA, La JF, Wukich DK, Kim PJ, Oz OK, Lavery LA. The effect of withholding antibiotics prior to bone biopsy in patients with suspected osteomyelitis: a meta‐analysis of the literature. Wounds Compend Clin Res Practice. 2019; 31 ( 8 ): 205 ‐ 212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClaros M, Citron DM, Goldstein EJ, Merriam CV, Tyrrell KL. Differences in distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobes isolated from complicated intra‐abdominal infections versus diabetic foot infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 76 ( 4 ): 546 ‐ 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54 ( 12 ): e132 ‐ e173.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartemann‐Heurtier A, Robert J, Jacqueminet S, et al. Diabetic foot ulcer and multidrug‐resistant organisms: risk factors and impact. Diabet Med. 2004; 21 ( 7 ): 710 ‐ 715.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenig O, Pogue JM, Cha R, et al., eds. Epidemiology of diabetic foot infection in the metro‐detroit area with a focus on independent predictors for pathogens resistant to recommended empiric antimicrobial therapy. Open forum infectious diseases. 2018 (Vol. 5, No. 11, p. ofy245). Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDang C, Prasad Y, Boulton A, Jude E. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the diabetic foot clinic: a worsening problem. Diabet Med. 2003; 20 ( 2 ): 159 ‐ 161.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.