Show simple item record

Esophageal motility disorders on high- resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©

dc.contributor.authorYadlapati, Rena
dc.contributor.authorKahrilas, Peter J.
dc.contributor.authorFox, Mark R.
dc.contributor.authorBredenoord, Albert J.
dc.contributor.authorPrakash Gyawali, C.
dc.contributor.authorRoman, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorBabaei, Arash
dc.contributor.authorMittal, Ravinder K.
dc.contributor.authorRommel, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorSavarino, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorSifrim, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorSmout, André
dc.contributor.authorVaezi, Michael F.
dc.contributor.authorZerbib, Frank
dc.contributor.authorAkiyama, Junichi
dc.contributor.authorBhatia, Shobna
dc.contributor.authorBor, Serhat
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Dustin A.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Joan W.
dc.contributor.authorCisternas, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCock, Charles
dc.contributor.authorCoss‐adame, Enrique
dc.contributor.authorde Bortoli, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorDefilippi, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorFass, Ronnie
dc.contributor.authorGhoshal, Uday C.
dc.contributor.authorGonlachanvit, Sutep
dc.contributor.authorHani, Albis
dc.contributor.authorHebbard, Geoffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorWook Jung, Kee
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Philip
dc.contributor.authorKatzka, David A.
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Abraham
dc.contributor.authorKohn, Geoffrey Paul
dc.contributor.authorLazarescu, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorLengliner, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorMittal, Sumeet K.
dc.contributor.authorOmari, Taher
dc.contributor.authorPark, Moo In
dc.contributor.authorPenagini, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorPohl, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Joel E.
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorSweis, Rami
dc.contributor.authorTack, Jan
dc.contributor.authorTatum, Roger P.
dc.contributor.authorTutuian, Radu
dc.contributor.authorVela, Marcelo F.
dc.contributor.authorWong, Reuben K.
dc.contributor.authorWu, Justin C.
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Yinglian
dc.contributor.authorPandolfino, John E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-05T18:49:18Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHS
dc.date.available2021-01-05T18:49:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.citationYadlapati, Rena; Kahrilas, Peter J.; Fox, Mark R.; Bredenoord, Albert J.; Prakash Gyawali, C.; Roman, Sabine; Babaei, Arash; Mittal, Ravinder K.; Rommel, Nathalie; Savarino, Edoardo; Sifrim, Daniel; Smout, André ; Vaezi, Michael F.; Zerbib, Frank; Akiyama, Junichi; Bhatia, Shobna; Bor, Serhat; Carlson, Dustin A.; Chen, Joan W.; Cisternas, Daniel; Cock, Charles; Coss‐adame, Enrique ; de Bortoli, Nicola; Defilippi, Claudia; Fass, Ronnie; Ghoshal, Uday C.; Gonlachanvit, Sutep; Hani, Albis; Hebbard, Geoffrey S.; Wook Jung, Kee; Katz, Philip; Katzka, David A.; Khan, Abraham; Kohn, Geoffrey Paul; Lazarescu, Adriana; Lengliner, Johannes; Mittal, Sumeet K.; Omari, Taher; Park, Moo In; Penagini, Roberto; Pohl, Daniel; Richter, Joel E.; Serra, Jordi; Sweis, Rami; Tack, Jan; Tatum, Roger P.; Tutuian, Radu; Vela, Marcelo F.; Wong, Reuben K.; Wu, Justin C.; Xiao, Yinglian; Pandolfino, John E. (2021). "Esophageal motility disorders on high- resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©." Neurogastroenterology & Motility (1): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1350-1925
dc.identifier.issn1365-2982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/163962
dc.description.abstractChicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0) is the updated classification scheme for esophageal motility disorders using metrics from high- resolution manometry (HRM). Fifty- two diverse international experts separated into seven working subgroups utilized formal validated methodologies over two- years to develop CCv4.0. Key updates in CCv.4.0 consist of a more rigorous and expansive HRM protocol that incorporates supine and upright test positions as well as provocative testing, a refined definition of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO), more stringent diagnostic criteria for ineffective esophageal motility and description of baseline EGJ metrics. Further, the CCv4.0 sought to define motility disorder diagnoses as conclusive and inconclusive based on associated symptoms, and findings on provocative testing as well as supportive testing with barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe. These changes attempt to minimize ambiguity in prior iterations of Chicago Classification and provide more standardized and rigorous criteria for patterns of disorders of peristalsis and obstruction at the EGJ.Key updates in the CCv4.0 include a protocol inclusive of varying positions and provocative tests, recognitions of conclusive and inconclusive patterns, requirement of clinically relevant symptoms for a conclusive diagnosis of EGJOO, distal esophageal spasm or hypercontractile esophagus, and increasingly stringent criteria for EGJOO and IEM.The classification using CCv4.0 is based on the primary position (either supine or upright), while assessment of swallows in the secondary position and with provocation provides supportive data, particularly for inconclusive settings.Listen to the podcast for this article.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherperoral endoscopic myotomy
dc.subject.otheresophageal spasm
dc.subject.otherintegrated relaxation pressure
dc.subject.otherlower esophageal sphincter
dc.subject.otherachalasia
dc.titleEsophageal motility disorders on high- resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163962/1/nmo14058.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/163962/2/nmo14058_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nmo.14058
dc.identifier.sourceNeurogastroenterology & Motility
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchupack D, Katzka DA, Geno DM, et al. The clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus in high resolution esophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29: 1 - 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, et al. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high- resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135: 1526 - 1533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiasutto D, Mion F, Garros A, et al. Rapid drink challenge test during esophageal high resolution manometry in patients with esophago- gastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30: e13293.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong BG, Min YW, Lee H, et al. Clinicomanometric factors associated with clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction from the Sandhill high- resolution manometry system. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30 ( 3 ): e13221.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElvevi A, Mauro A, Pugliese D, et al. Usefulness of low- and high- volume multiple rapid swallowing during high- resolution manometry. Dig Liver Dis. 2015; 47: 103 - 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartinucci I, Savarino EV, Pandolfino JE, et al. Vigor of peristalsis during multiple rapid swallows is inversely correlated with acid exposure time in patients with NERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28: 243 - 250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrause AJ, Su H, Triggs JR, et al. Multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on high- resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020: e14000. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14000. [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAng D, Hollenstein M, Misselwitz B, et al. Rapid Drink Challenge in high- resolution manometry: an adjunctive test for detection of esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29 ( 1 ): e12902.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarin I, Serra J. Patterns of esophageal pressure responses to a rapid drink challenge test in patients with esophageal motility disorders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28: 543 - 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanagapalli S, McGuire J, Leong RW, et al. The clinical relevance of manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction can be determined using rapid drink challenge and solid swallows. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000988. [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollenstein M, Thwaites P, Bütikofer S, et al. Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2: 644 - 653.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Diagnostic differences in the pharmacologic response to cholecystokinin and amyl nitrite in patients with absent contractility vs type I Achalasia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32: e13857.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabaei A, Shad S, Massey BT. Motility patterns following esophageal pharmacologic provocation with amyl nitrite or cholecystokinin during high- resolution manometry distinguish idiopathic vs opioid- induced type 3 achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18 ( 4 ): 813 - 821.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndolfi C, Fisichella PM. Meta- analysis of clinical outcome after treatment for achalasia based on manometric subtypes. Br J Surg. 2019; 106: 332 - 341.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee JY, Kim N, Kim SE, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 3 subtypes of achalasia according to the chicago classification in a tertiary institute in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 19: 485 - 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMin M, Peng LH, Yang YS, et al. Characteristics of achalasia subtypes in untreated Chinese patients: a high- resolution manometry study. J Dig Dis. 2012; 13: 504 - 509.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, et al. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144 ( 4 ): 718 - 725.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlonski W, Kumar A, Feldman J, et al. Timed barium swallow: diagnostic role and predictive value in untreated achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, and non- achalasia dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 196 - 203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkimoto S, Singhal S, Masuda T, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology and distal esophageal acid exposure. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61: 3537 - 3544.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClayton SB, Shin CM, Ewing A, et al. Pneumatic dilation improves esophageal emptying and symptoms in patients with idiopathic esophago- gastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13522.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkeke FC, Raja S, Lynch KL, et al. What is the clinical significance of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction? evaluation of 60 patients at a tertiary referral center. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29 ( 6 ): e13061.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Lin Z, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motility utilizing the functional lumen imaging probe. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111: 1726 - 1735.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim E, Yoo IK, Yon DK, et al. Characteristics of a subset of achalasia with normal integrated relaxation pressure. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 26: 274 - 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePonds FA, Bredenoord AJ, Kessing BF, et al. Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29 ( 1 ): e12908.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanagapalli S, Roman S, Hastier A, et al. Achalasia diagnosed despite normal integrated relaxation pressure responds favorably to therapy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13586.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabaei A, Szabo A, Shad S, et al. Chronic daily opioid exposure is associated with dysphagia, esophageal outflow obstruction, and disordered peristalsis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRatuapli SK, Crowell MD, DiBaise JK, et al. Opioid- induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) in patients on chronic opioids. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110: 979 - 984.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisselwitz B, Hollenstein M, Bütikofer S, et al. Prospective serial diagnostic study: the effects of position and provocative tests on the diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorders by high- resolution manometry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 51: 706 - 718.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeveridge CA, Falk GW, Ahuja NK, et al. Low yield of cross- sectional imaging in patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18: 1643 - 1644.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLay K, Austin GL, Menard- Katcher P. Anatomic abnormalities are common potential explanations of manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28: 1166 - 1171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu A, Woo M, Nasser Y, et al. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction on manometry: Outcomes and lack of benefit from CT and EUS. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13712.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePérez- Fernández M- T, Santander C, Marinero A, et al. Characterization and follow- up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28: 116 - 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 1310 - 1316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang YT, Tai LF, Yazaki E, et al. Investigation of dysphagia after antireflux surgery by high- resolution manometry: impact of multiple water swallows and a solid test meal on diagnosis, management, and clinical outcome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13: 1575 - 1583.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoscheit M, Gabbard S. Elevated intrabolus pressure predicts abnormal timed barium esophagram in esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 25: 521 - 524.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuader F, Reddy C, Patel A, et al. Elevated intrabolus pressure identifies obstructive processes when integrated relaxation pressure is normal on esophageal high- resolution manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017; 313: G73 - G79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingendonk MJ, Lin Z, Scheerens C, et al. High- resolution impedance manometry parameters in the evaluation of esophageal function of non- obstructive dysphagia patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13505.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong BG, Min YW, Lee H, et al. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and high- resolution manometry improves detection of clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 25: 75 - 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabaei A, Lin EC, Szabo A, et al. Determinants of pressure drift in Manoscan() esophageal high- resolution manometry system. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 277 - 284.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabaei A, Szabo A, Yorio SD, et al. Pressure exposure and catheter impingement affect the recorded pressure in the Manoscan 360 system. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30 ( 8 ): e13329.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZerbib F, Marin I, Cisternas D, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility and bolus clearance. A study with combined high- resolution manometry and impedance in asymptomatic controls and patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32 ( 9 ): e13876.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers BD, Rengarajan A, Mauro A, et al. Fragmented and failed swallows on esophageal high- resolution manometry associate with abnormal reflux burden better than weak swallows. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32: e13736.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerregods TVK, Smout AJPM, Ooi JLS, et al. Jackhammer esophagus: Observations on a European cohort. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29 ( 4 ): e12975.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahn A, Al- Qaisi MT, Obeid RA, et al. Clinical features and long- term outcomes of lower esophageal sphincter- dependent and lower esophageal sphincter- independent jackhammer esophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13507.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoman S, Pandolfino JE, Chen J, et al. Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high- resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107: 37 - 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl- Qaisi MT, Siddiki HA, Crowell MD, et al. The clinical significance of hypercontractile peristalsis: comparison of high- resolution manometric features, demographics, symptom presentation, and response to therapy in patients with Jackhammer esophagus versus Nutcracker esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2017; 30: 1 - 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhilonenko S, Roman S, Zerbib F, et al. Jackhammer esophagus: Clinical presentation, manometric diagnosis, and therapeutic results- Results from a multicenter French cohort. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32 ( 11 ): e13918.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXiao Y, Carlson DA, Lin Z, et al. Jackhammer esophagus: Assessing the balance between prepeak and postpeak contractile integral. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30: e13262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXiao Y, Carlson DA, Lin Z, et al. Chaotic peak propagation in patients with Jackhammer esophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32: e13725.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBulsiewicz WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Kwiatek MA, et al. Esophageal pressure topography criteria indicative of incomplete bolus clearance: a study using high- resolution impedance manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 2721 - 2728.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJain A, Baker JR, Chen JW. In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30: e13297.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoman S, Lin Z, Kwiatek MA, et al. Weak peristalsis in esophageal pressure topography: classification and association with Dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106: 349 - 356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRengarajan A, Bolkhir A, Gor P, et al. Esophagogastric junction and esophageal body contraction metrics on high- resolution manometry predict esophageal acid burden. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30: e13267.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChugh P, Collazo T, Dworkin B, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility is associated with impaired bolus clearance but does not correlate with severity of dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 2019; 64: 811 - 814.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin Z, Nicodème F, Lin C- Y, et al. Parameters for quantifying bolus retention with high- resolution impedance manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 26: 929 - 936.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu J- F, Tsai I- J, Tong T- W, et al. Pressure- impedance analysis: Assist the diagnosis and classification of ineffective esophageal motility disorder. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 35: 1317 - 1324.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuader F, Rogers B, Sievers T, et al. Contraction reserve with ineffective esophageal motility on esophageal high- resolution manometry is associated with lower acid exposure times compared with absent contraction reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020; 115 ( 12 ): 1981 - 1988. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000811
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGor P, Li Y, Munigala S, et al. Interrogation of esophagogastric junction barrier function using the esophagogastric junction contractile integral: an observational cohort study. Dis Esophagus. 2016; 29: 820 - 828.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHam H, Cho YK, Lee HH, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractile integral and morphology: Two high- resolution manometry metrics of the anti- reflux barrier. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 32: 1443 - 1449.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJasper D, Freitas- Queiroz N, Hollenstein M, et al. Prolonged measurement improves the assessment of the barrier function of the esophago- gastric junction by high- resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29 ( 2 ). https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12925
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicodème F, Pipa- Muniz M, Khanna K, et al. Quantifying esophagogastric junction contractility with a novel HRM topographic metric, the EGJ- Contractile Integral: normative values and preliminary evaluation in PPI non- responders. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014; 26: 353 - 360.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRengarajan A, Gyawali CP. High- resolution manometry can characterize esophagogastric junction morphology and predict esophageal reflux burden. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020; 54: 22 - 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTolone S, De Bortoli N, Marabotto E, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractility for clinical assessment in patients with GERD: a real added value? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 1423 - 1431.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang D, Patel A, Mello M, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ- CI) quantifies changes in EGJ barrier function with surgical intervention. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28: 639 - 646.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXie C, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Esophagogastric junction contractility integral reflect the anti- reflux barrier dysfunction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 23: 27 - 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers BD, Rengarajan A, Abrahao L, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral on high- resolution manometry in asymptomatic healthy volunteers: An international multicenter study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020: e14009. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14009. [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkimoto S, Singhal S, Masuda T, et al. Classification for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) complex based on physiology. Dis Esophagus. 2017; 30: 1 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMittal RK, Zifan A, Kumar D, et al. Functional morphology of the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm determined by three- dimensional high- resolution esophago- gastric junction pressure profile and CT imaging. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017; 313: G212 - G219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicodème F, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE, et al. Esophagogastric Junction pressure morphology: comparison between a station pull- through and real- time 3D- HRM representation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25: e591 - e598.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiebisch S, Wilshire CL, Peters JH. Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high- resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers. Dis Esophagus. 2013; 26: 651 - 660.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePandolfino JE, Kim H, Ghosh SK, et al. High- resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 1056 - 1063.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTolone S, de Cassan C, de Bortoli N, et al. Esophagogastric junction morphology is associated with a positive impedance- pH monitoring in patients with GERD. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 1175 - 1182.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 160 - 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferencepandolfino JE, fox MR, bredenoord AJ, et al. High- resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009; 21: 796 - 806.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012; 24 ( Suppl 1 ): 57 - 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYadlapati R, Gawron AJ, Keswani RN, et al. Identification of quality measures for performance of and interpretation of data from Esophageal manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 526 - 534.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYadlapati R, Vaezi MF, Vela MF, et al. Management options for patients with GERD and persistent symptoms on proton pump inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113: 980 - 986.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 401 - 406.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaker A, Stoikes N, Drapekin J, et al. Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high- resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108: 1706 - 1712.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMauro A, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, et al. Optimal number of multiple rapid swallows needed during high- resolution esophageal manometry for accurate prediction of contraction reserve. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 30: e13253.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodland P, Gabieta- Sonmez S, Arguero J, et al. 200 mL Rapid drink challenge during high- resolution manometry best predicts objective Esophagogastric junction obstruction and correlates with symptom severity. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018; 24: 410 - 414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAng D, Misselwitz B, Hollenstein M, et al. Diagnostic yield of high- resolution manometry with a solid test meal for clinically relevant, symptomatic oesophageal motility disorders: serial diagnostic study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2: 654 - 661.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabaei A, Shad S, Szabo A, et al. Pharmacologic interrogation of patients with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using amyl nitrite. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019; 31: e13668.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, et al. Functional luminal imaging probe panometry identifies achalasia- type esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18: 2209 - 2217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClayton SB, Patel R, Richter JE. Functional and anatomic esophagogastic junction outflow obstruction: manometry, timed barium esophagram findings, and treatment outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14: 907 - 911.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerregods TVK, Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Normative values in esophageal high- resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 175 - 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A, et al. Variant parameter values- as defined by the Chicago Criteria- produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 188 - 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSifrim D, Roman S, Savarino E, et al. Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance- pH metrics: a consensus analysis of impedance- pH studies from around the world. Gut. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl- 2020- 322627. [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRengarajan A, Rogers BD, Wong Z,, et al. High- resolution manometry thresholds and motor patterns among asymptomatic individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.052. [Epub ahead of print].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTriggs JR, Carlson DA, Beveridge C, et al. Upright integrated relaxation pressure facilitates characterization of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 2218 - 2226.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePandolfino JE, Roman S, Carlson D, et al. Distal esophageal spasm in high- resolution esophageal pressure topography: defining clinical phenotypes. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141: 469 - 475.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoman S, Kahrilas PJ, Kia L, et al. Effects of large hiatal hernias on esophageal peristalsis. Arch Surg. 2012; 147: 352 - 357.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.