Show simple item record

Global perspectives on physical and nonphysical discipline: A Bayesian multilevel analysis

dc.contributor.authorGrogan-Kaylor, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Berenice
dc.contributor.authorPace, Garrett
dc.contributor.authorWard, Kaitlin
dc.contributor.authorMa, Julie
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shawna
dc.contributor.authorKnauer, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T17:09:06Z
dc.date.available2021-01-13T17:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationGrogan-Kaylor, A., Castillo, B., Pace, G.T., Ward, K.P., Ma, J., Lee, S.J., & Knauer, H. (2021). Global perspectives on physical and nonphysical discipline: A Bayesian multilevel analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/165323
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: Sixty countries worldwide have banned the use of physical punishment, yet little is known about the association of physical and nonphysical forms of child discipline with child development in a global context. The objective of this study is to examine whether physical punishment and nonphysical discipline are associated with child socioemotional functioning in a global sample of families from 62 countries and whether country-level normativeness of physical punishment and nonphysical discipline moderated those associations. Methods: Data for this study are from 215,885 families in the fourth and fifth rounds of the United Nations Children’s Fund Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. Bayesian multilevel logistic models were used to analyze the associations of physical punishment and nonphysical discipline (i.e., taking away privileges and verbal reasoning) with three different outcomes representing children’s socioemotional functioning: getting along well with other children, aggression, and becoming distracted. Results: The use of physical punishment was not associated with getting along with other children, was associated with increased aggression, and was associated with increases in distraction. Taking away privileges was associated with lower levels of getting along with other children, higher levels of aggression, and higher levels of becoming distracted. Verbal reasoning (i.e., explaining why a behavior was wrong) was associated with higher levels of getting along with other children, higher levels of aggression, and higher levels of becoming distracted. Country-level normativeness moderated some of these associations but in general the direction of effects was consistent. Conclusions: Results suggest that eliminating physical punishment would benefit children across the globe and align with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which calls for all children to be free from physical violence. More attention needs to be focused on the associations of nonphysical forms of discipline with child functioning across the globe.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleGlobal perspectives on physical and nonphysical discipline: A Bayesian multilevel analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Social Worken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/165323/1/2021 Grogan-Kaylor MICS_IJBD.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0165025420981642
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 2021 Grogan-Kaylor MICS_IJBD.pdf : Main article
dc.owningcollnameSocial Work, School of (SSW)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.