Show simple item record

Repeated delivery of chlorhexidine chips for the treatment of peri‐implantitis: A multicenter, randomized, comparative clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorMachtei, Eli E.
dc.contributor.authorRomanos, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorKang, Philip
dc.contributor.authorTravan, Suncica
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorPapathanasiou, Evangelos
dc.contributor.authorTatarakis, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorTandlich, Moshik
dc.contributor.authorLiberman, Leila H.
dc.contributor.authorHorwitz, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorBassir, Seyed Hossein
dc.contributor.authorMyneni, Srinivas
dc.contributor.authorShiau, Harlan J.
dc.contributor.authorShapira, Lior
dc.contributor.authorDonos, Nikos
dc.contributor.authorPapas, Athena
dc.contributor.authorMeyle, Joerg
dc.contributor.authorGiannobile, William V.
dc.contributor.authorPapapanou, Panos N.
dc.contributor.authorKim, David M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T21:49:47Z
dc.date.available2022-02-04 16:49:45en
dc.date.available2021-02-04T21:49:47Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.identifier.citationMachtei, Eli E.; Romanos, Georgios; Kang, Philip; Travan, Suncica; Schmidt, Stephan; Papathanasiou, Evangelos; Tatarakis, Nikolaos; Tandlich, Moshik; Liberman, Leila H.; Horwitz, Jacob; Bassir, Seyed Hossein; Myneni, Srinivas; Shiau, Harlan J.; Shapira, Lior; Donos, Nikos; Papas, Athena; Meyle, Joerg; Giannobile, William V.; Papapanou, Panos N.; Kim, David M. (2021). "Repeated delivery of chlorhexidine chips for the treatment of peri‐implantitis: A multicenter, randomized, comparative clinical trial." Journal of Periodontology 92(1): 11-20.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/166183
dc.description.abstractBackgroundPeri‐implantitis is a challenging condition to manage and is frequently treated using non‐surgical debridement. The local delivery of antimicrobial agents has demonstrated benefit in mild to moderate cases of peri‐implantitis. This study compared the safety and efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate 2.5 mg chip (CHX chips) as an adjunctive treatment to subgingival debridement in patients afflicted with peri‐implantitis.MethodsA multicenter, randomized, single‐blind, two‐arm, parallel Phase‐3 study was conducted. Peri‐implantitis patients with implant pocket depths (IPD) of 5‐8 mm underwent subgingival implant surface debridement followed by repeated bi‐weekly supragingival plaque removal and chlorhexidine chips application (ChxC group) for 12 weeks, or similar therapy but without application of ChxC (control group). All patients were followed for 24 weeks. Plaque and gingival indices were measured at every visit whereas IPD, recession, and bleeding on probing were assessed at 8, 12, 16, 24 week.ResultsA total of 290 patients were included: 146 in the ChxC group and 144 in the control. At 24 weeks, a significant reduction in IPD (P = 0.01) was measured in the ChxC group (1.76 ± 1.13 mm) compared with the control group (1.54 ± 1.13 mm). IPD reduction of ≥2 mm was found in 59% and 47.2% of the implants in the ChxC and control groups, respectively (P = 0.03). Changes in gingival recession (0.29 ± 0.68 mm versus 0.15 ± 0.55 mm, P = 0.015) and relative attachment gain (1.47 ± 1.32 mm and 1.39 ± 1.27 mm, P = 0.0017) were significantly larger in the ChxC group. Patients in the ChxC group that were < 65 years exhibited significantly better responses (P < 0.02); likewise, non‐smokers had similarly better response (P < 0.02). Both protocols were well tolerated, and no severe treatment‐related adverse events were recorded throughout the study.ConclusionsPatients with peri‐implantitis that were treated with an intensive treatment protocol of bi‐weekly supragingival plaque removal and local application of chlorhexidine chips had greater mean IPD reduction and greater percentile of sites with IPD reduction of ≥2 mm as compared with bi‐weekly supra‐gingival plaque removal.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherclinical trial(s)
dc.subject.otherdrug delivery
dc.subject.otherimplantology
dc.subject.otherinfection control
dc.subject.otherlocal antimicrobial therapy
dc.titleRepeated delivery of chlorhexidine chips for the treatment of peri‐implantitis: A multicenter, randomized, comparative clinical trial
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/166183/1/jper10672.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/166183/2/jper10672_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.20-0353
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/106
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZee KY, Lee DH, Corbet EF. Repeated oral hygiene instructions alone, or in combination with metronidazole dental gel with or without subgingival scaling in adult periodontitis patients: a one‐year clinical study. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2006; 8: 125 ‐ 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV. Treatment of peri‐implantitis: what interventions are effective? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 ( Suppl 5 ): S21 ‐ S41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Long‐term outcome of surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis. A 2‐11‐year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 404 ‐ 410.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Roos‐Jansåker AM, Persson GR. Surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis lesions with or without the use of a bone substitute‐a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: 1266 ‐ 1274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoos‐Jansåker AM, Persson GR, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis using a bone substitute with or without a resorbable membrane: a 5‐year follow‐up. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41: 1108 ‐ 1114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsehed C, Holmlund A, Renvert S, Svenson B, Johansson I, Lundberg P. Effectiveness of enamel matrix derivative on the clinical and microbiological outcomes following surgical regenerative treatment of peri‐implantitis. A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43: 863 ‐ 873.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsler SC, Soysal F, Ceyhanlı T, Bakırarar B, Unsal B. Regenerative surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis using either a collagen membrane or concentrated growth factor: a 12‐month randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20: 703 ‐ 712.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachtei EE, Kim DM, Karimbux N, Zigdon‐Giladi H. The use of endothelial progenitor cells combined with barrier membrane for the reconstruction of peri‐implant osseous defects: an animal experimental study. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43: 289 ‐ 297.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapathanasiou E, Finkelman M, Hanley J, Parashis AO. Prevalence, etiology and treatment of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis: a survey of periodontists in the United States. J Periodontol. 2016; 87: 493 ‐ 501.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamanauskaite A, Daugela P, Juodzbalys G. Treatment of peri‐implantitis: meta‐analysis of findings in a systematic literature review and novel protocol proposal. Quintessence Int. 2016; 47: 379 ‐ 393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Lessem J, Dahlén G, Renvert H, Lindahl C. Mechanical and repeated antimicrobial therapy using a local drug delivery system in the treatment of peri‐implantitis: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 836 ‐ 844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBüchter A, Meyer U, Kruse‐Lösler B, Joos U, Kleinheinz J. Sustained release of doxycycline for the treatment of peri‐implantitis: randomised controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 42: 439 ‐ 444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli A, Feloutzis A, Brägger U, Lang NP. Treatment of peri‐implantitis by local delivery of tetracycline. Clinical, microbiological and radiological results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 287 ‐ 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachtei EE, Frankenthal S, Levi G, et al. Treatment of peri‐implantitis using multiple applications of chlorhexidine chips: a double‐blind, randomized multi‐centre clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 1198 ‐ 1205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972; 43: 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLöe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967; 38: 610 ‐ 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeo S, Kim HJ, Joo JY, Lee J, Kim SJ, Choi J. Simplified nonsurgical treatment of peri‐implantitis using chlorhexidine and minocycline hydrochloride. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018; 48: 326 ‐ 333.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaolantonio M, Perinetti G, D’Ercole S, et al. Internal decontamination of dental implants: an in vivo randomized microbiologic 6‐month trial on the effects of a chlorhexidine gel. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 1419 ‐ 1425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaggion CM Jr, Listl S, Frühauf N, Chang HJ, Tu YK. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials on non‐surgical treatments for peri‐implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41: 1015 ‐ 1025.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXiménez‐Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Som S, Thompson M, Torresyap G, Socransky SS. The effect of repeated professional supragingival plaque removal on the composition of the supra‐ and subgingival microbiota. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27: 637 ‐ 647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeil PH, Grauer JS, Gadbury‐Amyot CC, Kula K, McCunniff MD. Intentional use of the Hawthorne effect to improve oral hygiene compliance in orthodontic patients. J Dent Educ. 2002; 66: 1129 ‐ 1135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVase L, Vollert J, Finnerup NB, et al. Predictors of the placebo analgesia response in randomized controlled trials of chronic pain: a meta‐analysis of the individual data from nine industrially sponsored trials. Pain. 2015; 156: 1795 ‐ 1802.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJairath V, Zou G, Parker CE, et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis: placebo rates in induction and maintenance trials of ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016; 10: 607 ‐ 618.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeffcoat MK, Bray KS, Ciancio SG, et al. Adjunctive use of a subgingival controlled‐release chlorhexidine chip reduces probing depth and improves attachment level compared with scaling and root planning alone. J Periodontol. 1998; 69: 989 ‐ 997.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeffcoat MK, Palcanis KG, Weatherford TW, Reese M, Geurs NC, Flashner M. Use of a biodegradable chlorhexidine chip in the treatment of adult periodontitis: clinical and radiographic findings. J Periodontol. 2000; 71: 256 ‐ 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Lissovoy G, Rentz AM, Dukes EM, et al. The cost‐effectiveness of a new chlorhexidine delivery system in the treatment of adult periodontitis. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130: 855 ‐ 862.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohn G, Sahm N, Becker J, Schwarz F. Nonsurgical treatment of peri‐implantitis using an air‐abrasive device or mechanical debridement and local application of chlorhexidine. Twelve‐month follow‐up of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19: 1807 ‐ 1814.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JM, Hammächer C, Michael SS. Combination of ultrasonic decontamination, soft tissue curettage, and submucosal air polishing with povidone‐iodine application for non‐surgical therapy of peri‐implantitis: 12 Month clinical outcomes. J Periodontol. 2018; 89: 139 ‐ 147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions – Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( Suppl 1 ): S1 ‐ S8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 ( Suppl 1 ): S313 ‐ S318.
dc.working.doi10.7302/106en
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.