Show simple item record

Genetic counseling following direct‐to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives

dc.contributor.authorMarzulla, Tessa
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, J. Scott
dc.contributor.authorDeVries, Raymond
dc.contributor.authorKoeller, Diane R.
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Robert C.
dc.contributor.authorUhlmann, Wendy R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T21:43:13Z
dc.date.available2022-03-02 16:43:12en
dc.date.available2021-03-02T21:43:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.identifier.citationMarzulla, Tessa; Roberts, J. Scott; DeVries, Raymond; Koeller, Diane R.; Green, Robert C.; Uhlmann, Wendy R. (2021). "Genetic counseling following direct‐to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives." Journal of Genetic Counseling (1): 329-334.
dc.identifier.issn1059-7700
dc.identifier.issn1573-3599
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/166358
dc.description.abstractAs the use and scope of direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing (DTC GT), also becoming known as consumer‐driven genetic testing, increases, consumers may seek genetic counseling to understand their results and determine healthcare implications. In this study, we interviewed individuals who sought genetic counseling after receiving DTC GT results to explore their motivations, expectations, and experiences. Participants were recruited from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a longitudinal cohort study of DTC GT customers. We interviewed 15 participants (9 females, mean age = 38 years) by telephone and analyzed the double‐coded transcripts using qualitative methods. Motivations for genetic counseling included family and personal health histories, concern and confusion about results, and information‐seeking; of note, one‐third of our interview participants had Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome Type III (hypermobility type). Expectations of genetic counseling sessions were high. Participants generally saw DTC GT results as valid and potentially impactful for their healthcare, wanted more thorough explanations in “layman’s terms,” a pooling of their results with their family and personal health history and a “game plan.” Several participants had already accessed online resources, including resources typically used by genetics clinicians. Our results point to several elements of a successful DTC GT genetic counseling session: 1) effective contracting when starting the clinic visit, especially determining motivations for genetic counseling, results that are concerning/confusing and resources already accessed; 2) ascertainment and management of expectations and clearly communicating if and why all results may not be reviewed; 3) explaining how DTC GT differs from clinical genetic testing and why additional testing may not be indicated and 4) listening to (not dismissing) patient concerns about their results. For those patients who seek genetic counseling about DTC GT results, the findings from our study can help inform case preparation and provision of genetic counseling.
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherconsumer‐driven genetic testing
dc.subject.othergenetic testing
dc.subject.othergenetic test results
dc.subject.othergenetic counselors
dc.subject.othergenetic counseling
dc.subject.otherDirect‐to‐Consumer (DTC)
dc.subject.otherpersonal genomic testing
dc.titleGenetic counseling following direct‐to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelHuman Genetics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/166358/1/jgc41309_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/166358/2/jgc41309.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jgc4.1309
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Genetic Counseling
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarere, D. A., Couper, M. P., Crawford, S. D., Kalia, S. S., Duggan, J. R., Moreno, T. A., … Green, R. C. ( 2014 ). Design, methods, and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct‐to‐consumer personal genomic testing customers. Genome Medicine, 6 ( 12 ), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073‐014‐0096‐0
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrett, G. R., Metcalfe, S. A., Amor, D. J., & Halliday, J. L. ( 2012 ). An exploration of genetic health professionals’ experience with direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice. European Journal of Human Genetics, 20 ( 8 ), 825 – 830. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2012.13
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon, E. S., Griffin, G., Wawak, L., Pang, H., Gollust, S. E., & Bernhardt, B. A. ( 2012 ). “It’s not like judgment day”: Public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21 ( 3 ), 423 – 432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897‐011‐9476‐4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiovanni, M. A., Fickie, M. R., Lehmann, L. S., Green, R. C., Meckley, L. M., Veenstra, D., & Murray, M. F. ( 2010 ). Health‐care referrals from direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 14 ( 6 ), 817 – 819. https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2010.0051
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarst, B. F., Madlensky, L., Schork, N. J., Topol, E. J., & Bloss, C. S. ( 2013 ). Perceptions of genetic counseling services in direct‐to‐consumer personal genomic testing. Clinical Genetics, 84 ( 4 ), 335 – 339. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12166
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, C. J., & Knight, I. ( 2017 ). A humanisation approach for the management of Joint Hypermobility Syndrome/Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome‐Hypermobility Type (JHS/EDS‐HT). International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well‐Being, 12 ( 1 ), 1371993. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2017.1371993
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll, N. M., Blum‐Barnett, E., Madrid, S. D., Jonas, C., Janes, K., Alvarado, M., … Burnett‐Hartman, A. N. ( 2019 ). Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct‐ to‐consumer genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling. [Epub ahead of print] https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1193
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryant, A., & K. Charmaz (Eds.) ( 2010 ). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. London, UK and Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinkle, B., Castori, M., Berglund, B., Cohen, H., Grahame, R., Kazkaz, H., & Levy, H. ( 2017 ). Hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome Type III and Ehlers‐Danlos Syndrome Hypermobility Type): Clinical Description and natural history. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical. Genetics, 175 ( 1 ), 48 – 69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31538
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSturm, A. C., & Manickam, K. ( 2012 ). Direct‐to‐consumer personal genomic testing: A case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21 ( 3 ), 402 – 412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897‐012‐9489‐7
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt, J. L., Mass, R., & Altmeyer, S. R. ( 2019 ). Genetic counseling for consumer‐driven whole exome and whole genome sequencing: A commentary on early experiences. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 28 ( 2 ), 449 – 455. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1109
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegalado, A. ( 2019 ). More than 26 million have taken an at‐home ancestry test. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612880/more‐than‐26‐million‐people‐have‐taken‐an‐at‐home‐ancestry‐test/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstergren, J. E., Gornick, M. C., Carere, D. A., Kalia, S. S., Uhlmann, W. R., Ruffin, M. T., … Roberts, J. S. ( 2015 ). How well do customers of direct‐to‐consumer personal genomic testing services comprehend genetic test results? Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics Study. Public Health Genomics, 18 ( 4 ), 216 – 224. https://doi.org/10.1159/000431250
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeisel, S. F., Carere, D. A., Wardle, J., Kalia, S. S., Moreno, T. A., Mountain, J. L., … Green, R. C. ( 2015 ). Explaining, not just predicting, drives interest in personal genomics. Genome Medicine, 7 ( 1 ), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073‐015‐0188‐5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoeller, D. R., Uhlmann, W. R., Carere, D. A., Green, R. C., Roberts, J. S. & PGen Study Group ( 2017 ). Utilization of genetic counseling after direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26 ( 6 ), 1270 – 1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897‐017‐0106‐7
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoskovec, J. M., Bennett, R. L., Carey, M. E., DaVanzo, J. E., Dougherty, M., Hahn, S. E., … Wicklund, C. A. ( 2018 ). Projecting the supply and demand for certified genetic counselors: A workforce study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 27 ( 1 ), 16 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897‐017‐0158‐8
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.