Show simple item record

Home collection of nasal swabs for detection of influenza in the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation Study

dc.contributor.authorMalosh, Ryan E.
dc.contributor.authorPetrie, Joshua G.
dc.contributor.authorCallear, Amy P.
dc.contributor.authorMonto, Arnold S.
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Emily T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T21:48:25Z
dc.date.available2022-04-02 16:48:24en
dc.date.available2021-03-02T21:48:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifier.citationMalosh, Ryan E.; Petrie, Joshua G.; Callear, Amy P.; Monto, Arnold S.; Martin, Emily T. (2021). "Home collection of nasal swabs for detection of influenza in the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation Study." Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses (2): 227-234.
dc.identifier.issn1750-2640
dc.identifier.issn1750-2659
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/166444
dc.description.abstractBackgroundCommunity‐based studies of influenza and other respiratory viruses (eg, SARS‐CoV‐2) require laboratory confirmation of infection. During the current COVID‐19 pandemic, social distancing guidelines require alternative data collection in order to protect both research staff and participants. Home‐collected respiratory specimens are less resource‐intensive, can be collected earlier after symptom onset, and provide a low‐contact means of data collection. A prospective, multi‐year, community‐based cohort study is an ideal setting to examine the utility of home‐collected specimens for identification of influenza.MethodsWe describe the feasibility and reliability of home‐collected specimens for the detection of influenza. We collected data and specimens between October 2014 and June 2017 from the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation (HIVE) Study. Cohort participants were asked to collect a nasal swab at home upon onset of acute respiratory illness. Research staff also collected nose and throat swab specimens in the study clinic within 7 days of onset. We estimated agreement using Cohen’s kappa and calculated sensitivity and specificity of home‐collected compared to staff‐collected specimens.ResultsWe tested 336 paired staff‐ and home‐collected respiratory specimens for influenza by RT‐PCR; 150 staff‐collected specimens were positive for influenza A/H3N2, 23 for influenza A/H1N1, 14 for influenza B/Victoria, and 31 for influenza B/Yamagata. We found moderate agreement between collection methods for influenza A/H3N2 (0.70) and B/Yamagata (0.69) and high agreement for influenza A/H1N1 (0.87) and B/Victoria (0.86). Sensitivity ranged from 78% to 86% for all influenza types and subtypes. Specificity was high for influenza A/H1N1 and both influenza B lineages with a range from 96% to 100%, and slightly lower for A/H3N2 infections (88%).ConclusionsCollection of nasal swab specimens at home is both feasible and reliable for identification of influenza virus infections.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherinfluenza
dc.subject.otherself‐collected nasal swabs
dc.subject.othercommunity‐based
dc.subject.otheracute respiratory illness
dc.titleHome collection of nasal swabs for detection of influenza in the Household Influenza Vaccine Evaluation Study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/166444/1/irv12822_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/166444/2/irv12822.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/irv.12822
dc.identifier.sourceInfluenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Medica. Croatian Society for Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2012; 22 ( 3 ): 276 ‐ 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMolinari NAM, Ortega‐Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, et al. The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs. Vaccine. Elsevier. 2007; 25 ( 27 ): 5086 ‐ 5096.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlannery B, Chung JR, Monto AS, et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness in the United States during the 2016–2017 season. Clin Infect Dis. 2018; 68 ( 11 ): 1798 ‐ 1806.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlick B, Nishiura H, Leung GM, Cowling BJ. Optimal design of studies of influenza transmission in households. II: comparison between cohort and case‐ascertained studies. Epidemiol Infect. Cambridge University Press. 2014; 142 ( 4 ): 744 ‐ 752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpencer S, Thompson MG, Flannery B, Fry A. Comparison of respiratory specimen collection methods for detection of influenza virus infection by reverse transcription‐PCR: a literature review. J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57 ( 9 ): e00027 ‐19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambert SB, Whiley DM, O’Neill NT, et al. Comparing nose‐throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates collected from children with symptoms for respiratory virus identification using real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics. 2008; 122 ( 3 ): e615 ‐ e620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson MG, Ferber JR, Odouli R, et al. Results of a pilot study using self‐collected mid‐turbinate nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection among pregnant women TL ‐ 9. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2015; 9 ( 3 ): 155 ‐ 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito S, Molteni CG, Daleno C, et al. Collection by trained pediatricians or parents of mid‐turbinate nasal flocked swabs for the detection of influenza viruses in childhood. Virol J BioMed Central. 2010; 7: 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranados A, Quach S, McGeer A, Gubbay JB, Kwong JC. Detecting and quantifying influenza virus with self‐ versus investigator‐collected mid‐turbinate nasal swabs. J Med Virol. Wiley‐Blackwell. 2017; 89 ( 7 ): 1295 ‐ 1299.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell AP, Kuypers J, Englund JA, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Self‐collection of foam nasal swabs for respiratory virus detection by PCR among immunocompetent subjects and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients TL ‐ 51. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51 ( 1 ): 324 ‐ 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIp DKM, Schutten M, Fang VJ, et al. Validation of self‐swab for virologic confirmation of influenza virus infections in a community setting. J Infect Dis. Oxford University Press. 2012; 205 ( 4 ): 631 ‐ 634.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkmatov MK, Gatzemeier A, Schughart K, Pessler F. Equivalence of self‐ and staff‐collected nasal swabs for the detection of viral respiratory pathogens. McBryde ES, editor. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. 2012; 7 ( 11 ): e48508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkmatov MK, Pessler F. Self‐collected nasal swabs to detect infection and colonization: a useful tool for population‐based epidemiological studies? Int J Infect Dis. 2011; 15: e589 ‐ e593.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShu B, Wu K‐H, Emery S, et al. Design and performance of the CDC real‐time reverse transcriptase PCR swine flu panel for detection of 2009 A (H1N1) pandemic influenza virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49 ( 7 ): 2614 ‐ 2619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmery SL, Erdman DD, Bowen MD, et al. Real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction assay for SARS‐associated coronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10 ( 2 ): 311 ‐ 316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson ML, Chung JR, Jackson LA, et al. Influenza vaccine Effectiveness in the United States during the 2015–2016 season. N Engl J Med. Massachusetts Medical Society. 2017; 377 ( 6 ): 534 ‐ 543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkmatov MK, Krebs S, Preusse M, et al. E‐mail‐based symptomatic surveillance combined with self‐collection of nasal swabs: a new tool for acute respiratory infection epidemiology. Int J Infect Dis. Elsevier. 2011; 15 ( 11 ): e799 ‐ e803.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVargas CY, Wang L, Castellanos de Belliard Y, et al. Pilot study of participant‐collected nasal swabs for acute respiratory infections in a low‐income, urban population. Clin Epidemiol. Dove Press. 2016; 8: 1 ‐ 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpencer S, Chung J, Thompson M, et al. Factors associated with real‐time RT‐PCR cycle threshold values among medically attended influenza episodes. J Med Virol. 2016; 88 ( 4 ): 719 ‐ 723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmieja M, Castriciano S, Carruthers S, et al. Development and evaluation of a flocked nasal midturbinate swab for self‐collection in respiratory virus infection diagnostic testing TL ‐ 48. J Clin Microbiol. highwire. 2010; 48 ( 9 ): 3340 ‐ 3342.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarios OE, Coleman BL, Drews SJ, et al. Self‐collected mid‐turbinate swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses in adults with acute respiratory illnesses TL ‐ 6. PLoS ONE. plos. 2011; 6 ( 6 ): e21335.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpencer S, Gaglani M, Naleway A, et al. Consistency of influenza A virus detection test results across respiratory specimen collection methods using real‐time reverse transcription‐PCR TL ‐ 51. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51 ( 11 ): 3880 ‐ 3882.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher CE, Boeckh M, Jerome KR, Englund J, Kuypers J. Evaluating addition of self‐collected throat swabs to nasal swabs for respiratory virus detection. J Clin Virol Off Publ Pan Am Soc Clin Virol. 2019; 115: 43 ‐ 46.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.