Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multi‐shade composite resins
dc.contributor.author | Iyer, Rubinya Sundar | |
dc.contributor.author | Babani, Vinti Rajendra | |
dc.contributor.author | Yaman, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Dennison, Joseph | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-06T02:09:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-05 22:09:45 | en |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-06T02:09:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Iyer, Rubinya Sundar; Babani, Vinti Rajendra; Yaman, Peter; Dennison, Joseph (2021). "Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multi‐shade composite resins." Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 33(2): 394-400. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1496-4155 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1708-8240 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/167021 | |
dc.description.abstract | ObjectiveTo evaluate the shade match of three composite resin restorative materials to bi‐layered acrylic teeth instrumentally and visually.Materials and methodsThree composite materials—Omnichroma [OM], Tetric EvoCeram [TE], and TPH Spectra ST [TS] were placed into occlusal preparations (5 mm diameter, 2 mm depth) on 15 bi‐layered acrylic teeth per each shade A2, B1, B2, C2, and D3. The composites were placed in a single increment and cured using Bluephase G2 light. The L*, a*, and b* readings were obtained using VITA Easyshade V for the teeth and restorations; mean ΔE00 values were calculated and assessed using two‐way analysis of variance with a test of simple effects with multiple comparisons for significance (P < .05). Three teeth were restored to anatomical form with each of the composites for the five shades and were subjectively graded by 30 evaluators as 1—best match, 2—intermediate, and 3—poorest match.ResultsIn the instrumental evaluation, OM and TS showed lower ∆E00 values for lighter shades, whereas TE showed lower and similar ∆E00 values for all shades. In the visual evaluation, TE exhibited the best shade match for darker shades C2 and D3. OM and TS matched better with lighter shades.ConclusionShade matching is composite and shade‐dependent. Overall, TE matched the multiple shades better than the other two materials.Clinical significanceSingle and group shade composites displayed shade matching ability inferior to a multi‐shade composite material, which may limit their use in highly esthetic clinical situations. | |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | esthetics | |
dc.subject.other | color | |
dc.subject.other | blending | |
dc.subject.other | shade match | |
dc.subject.other | composite resin | |
dc.title | Color match using instrumental and visual methods for single, group, and multi‐shade composite resins | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167021/1/jerd12621.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167021/2/jerd12621_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jerd.12621 | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Klotz A‐L, Habibi Y, Corcodel N, et al. Laboratory and clinical reliability of two spectrophotometers. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30: 1 ‐ 5. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bakti I, Santosa AS, Irawan B, Damiyanti M. Chameleon effect of nano‐filled composite resin restorations in artificial acrylic teeth of various shades. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018; 1073 ( 5 ). | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hu X, Johnston WM, Seghi RR. Measuring the color of maxillofacial prosthetic material. J Dent Res. 2010; 89: 1522 ‐ 1527. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2004; 32: 3 ‐ 12. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kim D, Park SH. Color and translucency of resin‐based composites: comparison of A‐shade specimens within various product lines. Oper Dent. 2018; 43: 642 ‐ 655. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Johnston WM, Reisbick MH. Color and translucency changes during and after curing of esthetic restorative materials. Dent Mater. 1997; 13: 89 ‐ 97. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paravina RD, Westland S, Imai FH, Kimura M, Powers JM. Evaluation of blending effect of composites related to restoration size. Dent Mater J. 2006; 22: 299 ‐ 307. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paravina RD, Westland S, Kimura M, Powers JM, Imai FH. Color interaction of dental materials: blending effect of layered composites. Dent Mater J. 2006; 22: 903 ‐ 908. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pereira Sanchez N, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Instrumental and visual evaluation of the color adjustment potential of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 465 ‐ 470. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Abdelraouf RM, Habib NA. Color‐matching and blending‐effect of universal shade bulk‐fill‐resin‐composite in resin‐composite‐models and natural teeth. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 1 ‐ 8. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Burkinshaw SM. Colour in relation to dentistry. Fundamentals of colour science. Brit Dent J. 2004; 196: 33 ‐ 41. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | International Commission on Illumination (CIE). Colorimetry—technical report, 3rd ed. Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage, Bureau Central de la CIE, Vienna, CIE Pub. No. 15; 2004. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 color difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl. 2001; 26: 340 ‐ 350. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: a comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31: 103 ‐ 112. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010; 38: 57 ‐ 64. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Perez MM, Saleh A, Yebra A, Pulgar R. Study of the variation between CIELAB ∆E* and CIEDE2000 color‐differences of resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26: 21 ‐ 28. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Polo CG, Muñoz MP, Luengo ML, et al. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115: 65 ‐ 70. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Perez MM, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Dental ceramics: a CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences. J Dent. 2011; 39: 37 ‐ 44. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27: S1 ‐ S9. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, et al. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29: 303 ‐ 308. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems: review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010; 38: 2 ‐ 16. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El‐Zohairy A, et al. Performance of five commercially available tooth color‐measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007; 16: 93 ‐ 100. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kim‐Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade‐matching devices. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101: 193 ‐ 199. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sarafianou A, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Goula H. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107: 178 ‐ 185. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Suh YR, Ahn JS, Ju SW, Kim KM. Influences of filler content and size on the color adjustment potential of non‐layered resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2017; 36: 35 ‐ 40. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Arikawa H, Kanie T, Fujii K, et al. Effect of filler properties in composite resins on light transmittance characteristics and color. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26: 38 ‐ 44. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Azzopardi N, Moharamzadeh K, Wood D, et al. Effect of resin matrix composition on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2009; 25: 1564 ‐ 1568. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Seyed Mostafa M. Effect of filler content on mechanical and optical properties of dental composite resins. In: Cuppoletti J, ed. Metal, Ceramic and Polymeric Composites for Various Uses. Europe: InTech Open; 2011. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sharma G. The CIEDE2000 color‐difference formula. Excel spreadsheet implementation of the CIEDE2000 color‐difference formula (including test data). http://www.ece.rochester.edu/wgsharma/ciede2000/ | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ishihara S. Ishihara’s Test for Color Blindness. Tokyo, Japan: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.; 1993. | |
dc.working.doi | NO | en |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.