View Item 

Show simple item record

Life in the laparoscopic fast lane: evidence- based perioperative management and enhanced recovery in benign gynaecological laparoscopy
dc.contributor.authorBryant‐smith, Alison
dc.contributor.authorAs‐sanie, Sawsan
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Jillian
dc.contributor.authorWong, Maggie
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-12T17:23:47Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12 13:23:46en
dc.date.available2021-05-12T17:23:47Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifier.citationBryant‐smith, Alison ; As‐sanie, Sawsan ; Lloyd, Jillian; Wong, Maggie (2021). "Life in the laparoscopic fast lane: evidence- based perioperative management and enhanced recovery in benign gynaecological laparoscopy." The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (2): 113-123.
dc.identifier.issn1467-2561
dc.identifier.issn1744-4667
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/167468
dc.publisherDOH
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othersame- day surgery
dc.subject.otherperioperative management
dc.subject.otherevidence- based medicine
dc.subject.otherenhanced recovery
dc.subject.otherbenign laparoscopy
dc.titleLife in the laparoscopic fast lane: evidence- based perioperative management and enhanced recovery in benign gynaecological laparoscopy
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167468/1/tog12723-sup-0001-Supinfo.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167468/2/tog12723_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167468/3/tog12723.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tog.12723
dc.identifier.sourceThe Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
dc.identifier.citedreferenceApfel CC, Läärä E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross- validations between two centers. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 693 - 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013; 14: 73 - 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTill SR, Morgan DM, Bazzi AA, Pearlman MD, Abdelsattar Z, Campbell DA, et al. Reducing surgical site infections after hysterectomy: metronidazole plus cefazolin compared with cephalosporin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 187.e1 - 187.e11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Women’s Health Care Physicians, Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Solutions for surgical preparation of the vagina. Committee Opinion No. 571. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 718 - 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTam T, Harkins G, Wegrzyniak L, Ehrgood S, Kunselman A, Davies M. Infiltration of bupivacaine local anesthetic to trocar insertion sites after laparoscopy: a randomized, double- blind, stratified, and controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 1015 - 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchweitz O, Frye C, Moeller C, Nugent W, Krueger E, Nugent A, et al. Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port- site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 2326 - 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePan Y, Chen L, Zhong X, Feng S. Gum chewing combined with oral intake of a semi- liquid diet in the postoperative care of patients after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26: 3156 - 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen CT, Sørensen M, Møller C, Ottesen B, Kehlet H. Effect of laxatives on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast- track hysterectomy: a double- blind, placebo- controlled randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 311.e1 - 311.e7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlencowe NS, Waldon R, Vipond MN. Management of patients after laparoscopic procedures. BMJ 2018; 360: 6 - 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network (OPEN). Prescribing recommendations. Ann Arbor: OPEN; 2019 [ https://michigan- open.org/prescribing- recommendations/ ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAs- Sanie S, Till SR, Mowers EL, Lim CS, Skinner BD, Fritsch L, et al. Opioid prescribing patterns, patient use, and postoperative pain after hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 1261 - 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVilkins AL, Sahara M, Till SR, Ceci C, Howard R, Griffith KC, et al. Effects of shared decision making on opioid prescribing after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134: 823 - 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaeder J. Opioids in the treatment of postoperative pain: Old drugs with new options? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15: 449 - 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuntz JE, Michota FA. Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism in the surgical patient: options by surgery type and individual patient risk factors. Am J Surg 2010; 199 1 Suppl: S11 - 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Laparoscopic techniques for hysterectomy. Interventional procedures guidance. London: NICE; 2007 [ https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg239/resources/laparoscopic- techniques- for- hysterectomy- 1899865344377797 ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL). AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 9 - 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandberg EM, Twijnstra ARH, van Meir CA, Kok HS, van Geloven N, Gludovacz K, et al. Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019; 126: 804 - 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlessandri F, Mistrangelo E, Lijoi D, Ferrero S, Ragni N. A prospective, randomized trial comparing immediate versus delayed catheter removal following hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 716 - 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMueller E, Brubaker L, Eckler K. Postoperative urinary retention in women. UpToDate; 2019 [ https://www.uptodate.com/contents/postoperative- urinary- retention- in- women ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChamsy DJ, Louie MY, Lum DA, Phelps AL, Mansuria SM. Clinical utility of postoperative hemoglobin level testing following total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 224.e1 - 224.e7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePile JC. Evaluating postoperative fever: a focused approach. Cleve Clin J Med 2006; 73: S62 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman JS, Roddy E, Ueda S, Brooks R, Chen LL, Chen LM. Enhanced recovery pathways for improving outcomes after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: 138 - 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson G, Bakkum- Gamez J, Kalogera E, Glaser G, Altman A, Meyer LA, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations - 2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29: 651 - 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheib SA, Thomassee M, Kenner JL. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Gynecology: a review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019; 26: 327 - 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceModesitt SC, Sarosiek BM, Trowbridge ER, Redick DL, Shah PM, Thiele RH, et al. Enhanced recovery implementation in major gynecologic surgeries: effect of care standardization. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: 457 - 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson JC, Moonesinghe SR, Grocott MPW, Kuper M, McMeeking A, Oliver CM, et al. Enhanced recovery from surgery in the UK: an audit of the enhanced recovery partnership programme 2009- 2012. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 560 - 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeil DS, Schiff LD, Carey ET, Moulder JK, Goetzinger AM, Patidar SM, et al. Predictors of admission after the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2019; 129: 776 - 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoper DE. Bacterial vaginosis and surgical site infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222: 219 - 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnox M, Myers E, Wilson I, Hurley M. The impact of pre- operative assessment clinics on elective surgical case cancellations. Surgeon 2009; 7: 76 - 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodsky JB. Recent advances in anesthesia of the obese patient. F1000 Res 2018; 7: 1 - 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanta Mina D, Clarke H, Ritvo P, Leung YW, Matthew AG, Katz J, et al. Effect of total- body prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Physiother 2014; 100: 196 - 207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Health (DOH). Risk assessment for venous thromboembolism (VTE). London: DOH; 2010 [ https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng89/resources/department- of- health- vte- risk- assessment- tool- pdf- 4787149213 ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Venous thromboembolism in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital- acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. NICE guideline [NG89]. London: NICE; 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuentes H, Paz L, Al- Ogaili A, Andrade X, Oramas D, Salazar- Adum J, et al. Validation of a patient- completed Caprini risk score for venous thromboembolism risk assessment. TH Open 2017; 1: e106 - 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMDCalc. Caprini score for venous thromboembolism. 2019 [ https://www.mdcalc.com/caprini- score- venous- thromboembolism- 2005 ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarey ET, Moulder JK. Perioperative management and implementation of enhanced recovery programs in gynecologic surgery for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: 137 - 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDhatariya K, Levy N, Flanagan D, Hilton L, Kilvert A, Rayman G, et al. Management of adults with diabetes undergoing surgery and elective procedures: improving standards. Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care; 2016 [ https://www.diabetes.org.uk/resources- s3/2017- 09/Surgicalguidelines2015- fullFINALamendedMar2016_0.pdf ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMunro J, Booth A, Nicholi J. Routine preoperative testing: standing group on health technology. Health Technol Assess 1997; 1: 1 - 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Preoperative tests (update): routine preoperative tests for elective surgery. London: NICE; 2016 [ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0086571/pdf/PubMedHealth_PMH0086571.pdf ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein MD, Boland BJ. Conceptual framework for evaluating laboratory tests: case- finding in ambulatory patients. Clin Chem 1994; 40: 1621 - 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKotzé A, Harris A, Baker C, Iqbal T, Lavies N, Richards T, et al. British Committee for Standards in Haematology guidelines on the identification and management of pre- operative anaemia. Br J Haematol 2015; 171: 322 - 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Blood Authority (NBA). Perioperative patient blood management guidelines: module 2. Canberra: NBA; 2012. pp. 177 [ http://www.blood.gov.au/system/files/documents/pbm- module- 2.pdf ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUK Clinical Pharmacy Association (UKCPA). The Handbook of Perioperative Medicines. Leicester; UKCPA; 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeeling D, Tait RC, Watson H. British Committee of Standards for Haematology. Peri- operative management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. Br J Haematol 2016; 175: 602 - 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoh E, Barker V, Lee PL, Eden D, Davies O, Sahu B. Perioperative management of women on oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents undergoing gynaecological procedures. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 2020; 22: 131 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment. Clinical guideline CG74 London: NICE; 2019 [ https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg74/resources/surgical- site- infections- prevention- and- treatment- pdf- 975628422853 ].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Summary: Perioperative pathways: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 750. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: 801 - 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang J, Xu L, Shi G. Is mechanical bowel preparation necessary for gynecologic surgery? A systematic review and meta- analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016; 81: 155 - 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrawford RAF, Acheson N, Nordin AJ, Torbé EJ, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Enhanced recovery in gynaecology. Scientific Impact Paper No. 36. London: RCOG; 2013. pp. 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearse RM, Ackland GL. Perioperative fluid therapy. BMJ 2012; 344: e2865.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouglas WR, Stacy K, Peter D, Mary HS, Bonnie R, Kathy V, et al. Pre- operative pregnancy testing (POPT) and the undiagnosed pregnancy rate in an elective gynaecology surgery population. Clin Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med 2015; 1: 43 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteiner HL, Strand EA. Surgical- site infection in gynecologic surgery: pathophysiology and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 121 - 8.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
tog12723-sup-0001-Supinfo.pdf
Size:
66.44KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
tog12723_am.pdf
Size:
684.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
tog12723.pdf
Size:
299.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.