View Item 

Show simple item record

Do Firm Cues Impact Product Perceptions? When Small is Natural
dc.contributor.authorScekic, Ana
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, Aradhna
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-12T17:26:46Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12 13:26:44en
dc.date.available2021-05-12T17:26:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifier.citationScekic, Ana; Krishna, Aradhna (2021). "Do Firm Cues Impact Product Perceptions? When Small is Natural." Journal of Consumer Psychology 31(2): 350-359.
dc.identifier.issn1057-7408
dc.identifier.issn1532-7663
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/167534
dc.publisherThe Guilford Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherProduct naturalness
dc.subject.otherFirm cues
dc.subject.otherFirm size
dc.subject.otherProduct perceptions
dc.titleDo Firm Cues Impact Product Perceptions? When Small is Natural
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167534/1/jcpy1210_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167534/2/jcpy1210.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcpy.1210
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Consumer Psychology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRozin, P. ( 2005 ). The meaning of “natural” process more important than content. Psychological Science, 16, 652 – 658.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. ( 1994 ). The role of consumers’ intuitions in inference making. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 393 – 407.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. ( 1997 ). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61, 68 – 84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElder, R., & Krishna, A. ( 2012 ). The visual depiction effect: Inducing embodied mental simulation that evokes motor responses. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 988 – 1003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. ( 1998 ). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaws, K. L., Reczek, R. W., & Sample, K. L. ( 2016 ). Healthy diets make empty wallets: The healthy= expensive intuition. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 992 – 1007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2018 ). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach ( 2nd ed. ) The Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. ( 2014 ). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451 – 470.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLabbe, D., Pineau, N., & Martin, N. ( 2013 ). Food expected naturalness: Impact of visual, tactile and auditory packaging material properties and role of perceptual interactions. Food Quality and Preference, 27, 170 – 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ( 1980 ). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77, 453 – 486.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. ( 2000 ). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173 – 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarckhgott, E., & Kamleitner, B. ( 2019 ). Matte matters: When matte packaging increases perceptions of food naturalness. Marketing Letters, 30, 167 – 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaghubir, P., & Valenzuela, A. ( 2006 ). Center‐of‐inattention: Position biases in decision‐making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 66 – 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaghunathan, R., Naylor, R. W., & Hoyer, W. D. ( 2006 ). The unhealthy= tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70, 170 – 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRozin, P., & Nemeroff, C. ( 1990 ). The laws of sympathetic magic: A psychological analysis of similarity and contagion. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 205 – 232 ). Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRozin, P., Spranca, M., Krieger, Z., Neuhaus, R., Surillo, D., Swerdlin, A., & Wood, K. ( 2004 ). Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite, 43, 147 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. ( 2011 ). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359 – 371.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. ( 2001 ). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225 – 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, R. K., Newman, G. E., & Dhar, R. ( 2015 ). Closer to the creator: Temporal contagion explains the preference for earlier serial numbers. Journal of Consumer Research, 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwamidass, P. M., & Kotha, S. ( 1998 ). Explaining manufacturing technology use, firm size and performance using a multidimensional view of technology1. Journal of Operations Management, 17, 23 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhao, X., Lynch, J. G. Jr, & Chen, Q. ( 2010 ). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197 – 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. ( 2004 ). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47, 9 – 24.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jcpy1210_am.pdf
Size:
363.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jcpy1210.pdf
Size:
1.223MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.