Show simple item record

A Unified Panopticon: Insights from a Study on Workplace Surveillance at Amazon and Uber

dc.contributor.authorMikell, Sam
dc.contributor.advisorGreen, Ben
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-02T12:28:30Z
dc.date.available2021-06-02T12:28:30Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.identifierBA 480en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/167743
dc.description.abstractThis paper offers a proposal for a thesis examining the relationship between organizational structure and workplace surveillance. Primarily, surveillance practices falling under a top-down control category will be considered. To draw conclusions about the relationship, an explicit case study will be conducted to comparatively analyze workplace surveillance practices at Amazon and Uber. The goal is to evaluate whether the surveillance practices deployed by these companies are mostly similar, implying the underlying organizational structure is agnostic of surveillance and a deeper overlap is the root, or mostly different, implying the underlying organizational structure could be important for crafting approaches to resisting surveillance and overcoming negative conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subject.classificationBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.subject.classificationStrategyen_US
dc.titleA Unified Panopticon: Insights from a Study on Workplace Surveillance at Amazon and Uberen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167743/1/Sam Mikell.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/1283
dc.working.doi10.7302/1283en_US
dc.owningcollnameBusiness, Stephen M. Ross School of - Senior Thesis Written Reports


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.