A theoretical model of contraceptive decision‐making and behaviour in diabetes: A qualitative application of the Health Belief Model
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Emily | |
dc.contributor.author | DeJonckheere, Melissa | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliverio, Andrea L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Kathryn S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Sparrentak, Murphy | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Justine P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-02T21:06:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-02 17:06:31 | en |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-02T21:06:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Johnson, Emily; DeJonckheere, Melissa; Oliverio, Andrea L.; Brown, Kathryn S.; Van Sparrentak, Murphy; Wu, Justine P. (2021). "A theoretical model of contraceptive decision‐making and behaviour in diabetes: A qualitative application of the Health Belief Model." Diabetic Medicine (6): n/a-n/a. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0742-3071 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1464-5491 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/167788 | |
dc.description.abstract | AimPeople with diabetes have contraceptive needs that have been inadequately addressed. The aim of this qualitative study was to develop a theoretical model that reflects contraceptive decision‐making and behaviour in the setting of diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe conducted semi‐structured, qualitative interviews of 17 women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from Michigan, USA. Participants were recruited from a diabetes registry and local clinics. We adapted domains from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and applied reproductive justice principles to inform the qualitative data collection and analysis. Using an iterative coding template, we advanced from descriptive to theoretical codes, compared codes across characteristics of interest (e.g. diabetes type), and synthesized the theoretical codes and their relationships in an explanatory model.ResultsThe final model included the following constructs and themes: perceived barriers and benefits to contraceptive use (effects on blood sugar, risk of diabetes‐related complications, improved quality of life); perceived seriousness of pregnancy (harm to self, harm to foetus or baby); perceived susceptibility to pregnancy risks (diabetes is a ‘high risk’ state); external cues to action (one‐size‐fits‐all/anxiety‐provoking counselling vs. personalized/trust‐based counselling); internal cues to action (self‐perceived ‘sickness’); self‐efficacy (reproductive self‐efficacy, contraceptive self‐efficacy); and modifying factors (perceptions of biased counselling based upon one’s age, race or severity of disease).ConclusionsThis novel adaptation of the HBM highlights the need for condition‐specific and person‐centred contraceptive counselling for those with diabetes. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications Inc | |
dc.title | A theoretical model of contraceptive decision‐making and behaviour in diabetes: A qualitative application of the Health Belief Model | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167788/1/dme14434.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167788/2/dme14434_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/dme.14434 | |
dc.identifier.source | Diabetic Medicine | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Idler EL, Angel RJ. Self‐rated health and mortality in the NHANES‐I Epidemiologic Follow‐up Study. Am J Public Health. 1990; 80 ( 4 ): 446 – 452. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lavender T, Platt MJ, Tsekiri E, et al. Women’s perceptions of being pregnant and having pregestational diabetes. Midwifery. 2010; 26 ( 6 ): 589 – 595. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Britton LE, Hussey JM, Crandell JL, Brooks JL, Bryant AG. Contraceptive use among women with prediabetes and diabetes in a US national sample. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019; 64 ( 1 ): 36 – 45. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vahratian A, Barber JS, Lawrence JM, Kim C. Family‐planning practices among women with diabetes and overweight and obese women in the 2002 National Survey For Family Growth. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32 ( 6 ): 1026 – 1031. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schwarz EB, Postlethwaite D, Hung Y‐Y, Lantzman E, Armstrong MA, Horberg MA. Provision of contraceptive services to women with diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27 ( 2 ): 196 – 201. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schwarz EB, Sobota M, Charron‐Prochownik D. Perceived access to contraception among adolescents with diabetes: barriers to preventing pregnancy complications. Diabetes Educ. 2010; 36 ( 3 ): 489 – 494. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shawe J, Smith P, Stephenson J. Use of contraception by women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus: ’it’s funny that nobody really spoke to me about it’. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011; 16 ( 5 ): 350 – 358. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lopez LM, Grey TW, Chen M, Tolley EE, Stockton LL. Theory‐based interventions for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1: CD007249. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Becker MH. The Health Belief Model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974; 2: 324 – 473. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hall KS. The Health Belief Model can guide modern contraceptive behavior research and practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012; 57 ( 1 ): 74 – 81. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wu JP, Damschroder LJ, Fetters MD, et al. A web‐based decision tool to improve contraceptive counseling for women with chronic medical conditions: Protocol for a mixed methods implementation study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018; 7 ( 4 ): e107. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015; 42 ( 5 ): 534. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zhang L, Freeman Ferguson T, Simonsen N, Chen L, Tseng T‐S. Racial/ethnic disparities in health‐related quality of life among participants with self‐reported diabetes from NHANES 2001–2010. Diabetes Educ. 2014; 40 ( 4 ): 496 – 506. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gandhi K, Lim E, Davis J, et al. Racial‐ethnic disparities in self‐reported health status among US adults adjusted for sociodemographics and multimorbidities, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2014. Ethn Health. 2020; 25 ( 1 ): 65 – 78. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | DeJonckheere M, Vaughn LM. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Com Health. 2019; 7 ( 2 ): e000057. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | MAXQDA (computer program). VERBI GmbH. 2017; Available from: https://www.maxqda.com. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Using codes and code manuals: a template organizing style of interpretation. In: BF Crabtree and WL Miller, Eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 1999: 163 – 178. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miles MB, Huberman AM. Early steps in analysis: codes and coding. In R Holland (Ed), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc; 1994: 55 – 65. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nelson J. Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2017; 17 ( 5 ): 554 – 570. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ross LJ, Solinger R. Reproductive justice in the twenty‐first century. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. Oakland, CA: University of California Press; 2017: 58 – 116. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dehlendorf C, Henderson JT, Vittinghoff E, et al. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215 ( 1 ): 78.e1 – 78.e9. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, et al. US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65 ( 3 ): 1 – 103. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Negrato CA, Mattar R, Gomes MB. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2012; 4 ( 1 ): 41. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mhyre JM, Bateman BT, Leffert LR. Influence of patient comorbidities on the risk of near‐miss maternal morbidity or mortality. Anesthesiology. 2011; 115 ( 5 ): 963 – 972. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bullo M, Tschumi S, Bucher BS, Bianchetti MG, Simonetti GD. Pregnancy outcome following exposure to angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists: a systematic review. Hypertension. 2012; 60 ( 2 ): 444 – 450. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Edison RJ, Muenke M. Central nervous system and limb anomalies in case reports of first‐trimester statin exposure. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350 ( 15 ): 1579 – 1582. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Charron‐Prochownik D, Sereika SM, Becker D, et al. Reproductive health beliefs and behaviors in teens with diabetes: application of the Expanded Health Belief Model. Pediatr Diabetes. 2001; 2 ( 1 ): 30 – 39. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chuang CH, Velott DL, Weisman CS. Exploring knowledge and attitudes related to pregnancy and preconception health in women with chronic medical conditions. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14 ( 5 ): 713 – 719. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Forde R, Collin J, Brackenridge A, Chamley M, Hunt K, Forbes A. A qualitative study exploring the factors that influence the uptake of pre‐pregnancy care among women with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2020; 37 ( 6 ): 1038 – 1048. | |
dc.working.doi | NO | en |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.