View Item 

Show simple item record

Impact of mucosal phenotype on marginal bone levels around tissue level implants: A prospective controlled trial
dc.contributor.authorGaraicoa‐pazmino, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorOu, Alice
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.contributor.authorMailoa, James
dc.contributor.authorSuárez‐lópez Del Amo, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T20:11:39Z
dc.date.available2022-07-01 16:11:38en
dc.date.available2021-07-01T20:11:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-06
dc.identifier.citationGaraicoa‐pazmino, Carlos ; Mendonça, Gustavo ; Ou, Alice; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Mailoa, James; Suárez‐lópez Del Amo, Fernando ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2021). "Impact of mucosal phenotype on marginal bone levels around tissue level implants: A prospective controlled trial." Journal of Periodontology 92(6): 771-783.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/168300
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe aim of this 1- year prospective clinical trial was to compare clinical parameters and marginal bone levels (MBLs) around tissue level implants with a partially smooth collar between patients with thin (- ¤2 mm) and thick (>2 mm) vertical mucosal phenotypes.MethodsThirty patients needing a single dental implant were recruited and allocated to thin (n = 14) or thick (n = 16) phenotype groups. Post- restoration, clinical (probing depth, recession, width of keratinized mucosa, bleeding on probing, suppuration, implant mobility, plaque index, and gingival index) and radiographic bone level measurements were recorded at different timepoints for 1 year.ResultsTwenty- six patients (13 per group) completed the 1- year examination. No implants were lost (100% survival rate). There were no significant differences (P >0.05) between thin and thick vertical mucosal phenotypes for any clinical parameter or for the radiographic MBL.ConclusionsTissue level implants at 1 year of function placed in thin vertical mucosa achieved similar clinical parameters and radiographic MBLs as those in thick tissue. The formation of the peri- implant supracrestal tissue height plays a key role in MBL than mucosal thickness in tissue level implant.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheralveolar bone loss
dc.subject.otherphenotype
dc.subject.otherdental implant
dc.subject.othersoft tissue therapy
dc.subject.otherperi- implant endosseous healing
dc.titleImpact of mucosal phenotype on marginal bone levels around tissue level implants: A prospective controlled trial
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168300/1/jper10674_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168300/2/jper10674.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.20-0458
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee SY, Piao CM, Koak JY, et al. A 3- year prospective radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around different implant systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 538 - 544.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpinato S, Stacchi C, Lombardi T, Bernardello F, Messina M, Zaffe D. Biological width establishment around dental implants is influenced by abutment height irrespective of vertical mucosal thickness: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30: 649 - 659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanco J, Pico A, Caneiro L, Novoa L, Batalla P, Martin- Lancharro P. Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 108 - 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePico A, Martin- Lancharro P, Caneiro L, Novoa L, Batalla P, Blanco J. Influence of abutment height and implant depth position on interproximal peri- implant bone in sites with thin mucosa: a 1- year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30: 595 - 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatafuchi M, Weinstein BF, Leroux BG, Chen YW, Daubert DM. Restoration contour is a risk indicator for peri- implantitis: A cross- sectional radiographic analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: 225 - 232. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12829
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Galindo- Moreno P, Tozum TF, Suarez- Lopez del Amo F, Wang HL. Into the paradigm of local factors as contributors for peri- implant disease: Short communication. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31: 288 - 292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuarez- Lopez Del Amo F, Lin GH, Monje A, Galindo- Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of soft tissue thickness on peri- implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta- analysis. J Periodontol. 2016; 87: 690 - 699.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiaz- Sanchez M, Soto- Penaloza D, Penarrocha- Oltra D, Penarrocha- Diago M. Influence of supracrestal tissue attachment thickness on radiographic bone level around dental implants: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2019; 54: 573 - 588.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Curtis DA, Kapila Y, et al. The significance of surgically modifying soft tissue phenotype around fixed dental prostheses: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol. 2020; 91: 339 - 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri- implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 (suppl 15 ): 32 - 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Eekeren P, van Elsas P, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. The influence of initial mucosal thickness on crestal bone change in similar macrogeometrical implants: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 214 - 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972; 43: 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Eekeren P, Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D. Crestal bone changes in macrogeometrically similar implants with the implant- abutment connection at the crestal bone level or 2.5 mm above: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 1479 - 1484.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFernandez- Formoso N, Rilo B, Mora MJ, Martinez- Silva I, Diaz- Afonso AM. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone maintenance around tissue level implant and bone level implant: a randomised controlled trial. A 1- year follow- up. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39: 830 - 837.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKadkhodazadeh M, Heidari B, Abdi Z, Mollaverdi F, Amid R. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels around dental implants with different designs after 1 year. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71: 92 - 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Reaction of crestal bone around implants depending on mucosal tissue thickness. A 1- year prospective clinical study. Stomatologija. 2009; 11: 83 - 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Gineviciute E, Linkeviciene L. The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2- year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12903 Online ahead of print
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVervaeke S, Dierens M, Besseler J, De Bruyn H. The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on peri- implant bone remodeling. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16: 238 - 247.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkcali A, Trullenque- Eriksson A, Sun C, Petrie A, Nibali L, Donos N. What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 1046 - 1053.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallner G, Rieder D, Wichmann MG, Heckmann SM. Peri- implant bone loss of tissue- level and bone- level implants in the esthetic zone with gingival biotype analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33: 1119 - 1125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Svediene O, Linkevicius R, Linkeviciene L. Radiological comparison of laser- microtextured and platform- switched implants in thin mucosal biotype. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 599 - 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMailoa J, Arnett M, Chan HL, George FM, Kaigler D, Wang HL. The association between buccal mucosa thickness and periimplant bone loss and attachment loss: A cross- sectional study. Implant dentistry. 2018; 27: 575 - 581.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThoma DS, Buranawat B, Hammerle CH, Held U, Jung RE. Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 (suppl 15 ): S77 - S91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1755 - 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIorio- Siciliano V, Blasi A, Sammartino G, Salvi GE, Sculean A. Soft tissue stability related to mucosal recession at dental implants: A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2020; 51: 28 - 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuarnieri R, Di Nardo D, Gaimari G, Miccoli G, Testarelli L. Implant- gingival unit stability around one- stage implant with laser- microgrooved collar: Three- year result of a prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019; 39: 875 - 882.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz F, Sager M, Golubovic V, Iglhaut G, Becker K. Horizontal mucosal thickness at implant sites as it correlates with the integrity and thickness of the buccal bone plate. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 1305 - 1309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle CHF, Tarnow D. The etiology of hard- and soft- tissue deficiencies at dental implants: a narrative review. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 (Suppl 20 ): S267 - S277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The peri- implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 212 - 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila- Ortiz G, Gonzalez- Martin O, Couso- Queiruga E, Wang HL. The peri- implant phenotype. J Periodontol. 2020; 91: 283 - 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23: 971 - 973.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone- level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 123 - 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 1228 - 1236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Schlee M. Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 497 - 508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1- year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 712 - 719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26: 9 - 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl- Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platform- switching technique on preservation of peri- implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 138 - 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIorio- Siciliano V, Marenzi G, Blasi A, et al. Influence of platform- switched, laser- microtextured implant on marginal bone level: A 24- month case series study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31: 162 - 166.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. A within- implant comparison to evaluate the concept of platform switching: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012; 5: 253 - 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsu YT, Lin GH, Wang HL. Effects of platform- switching on peri- implant soft and hard tissue outcomes: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: e9 - e24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErcoli C, Jammal G, Buyers M, et al. Influence of apico- coronal implant placement on post- surgical crestal bone loss in humans. J Periodontol. 2017; 88: 762 - 770.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo- Moreno P, Leon- Cano A, Monje A, Ortega- Oller I, O’Valle F, Catena A., Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri- implant marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 167 - 173.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper10674_am.pdf
Size:
1.824MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper10674.pdf
Size:
1.889MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.