View Item 

Show simple item record

Co‐development of alcohol use problems and antisocial peer affiliation from ages 11 to 34: selection, socialization and genetic and environmental influences
dc.contributor.authorBrislin, Sarah J.
dc.contributor.authorClark, D. Angus
dc.contributor.authorHeitzeg, Mary M.
dc.contributor.authorSamek, Diana R.
dc.contributor.authorIacono, William G.
dc.contributor.authorMcGue, Matt
dc.contributor.authorHicks, Brian M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T18:15:26Z
dc.date.available2022-09-03 14:15:25en
dc.date.available2021-08-03T18:15:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.identifier.citationBrislin, Sarah J.; Clark, D. Angus; Heitzeg, Mary M.; Samek, Diana R.; Iacono, William G.; McGue, Matt; Hicks, Brian M. (2021). "Co‐development of alcohol use problems and antisocial peer affiliation from ages 11 to 34: selection, socialization and genetic and environmental influences." Addiction 116(8): 1999-2007.
dc.identifier.issn0965-2140
dc.identifier.issn1360-0443
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/168476
dc.description.abstractBackground and aimsSocial context is an important factor in determining the developmental trajectory of alcohol use. We examined the co‐development between alcohol use problems and antisocial peer affiliation. We also estimated the genetic and environmental influences on alcohol use problems, antisocial peer affiliation and their co‐development over time.DesignLongitudinal study using bivariate latent basis models with structured residuals (LBM‐SR). A biometric model was then fitted to estimate the genetic and environmental influences on the growth factors and their covariances.SettingThe United States mid‐west region.ParticipantsMembers of the Minnesota Twin Family Study (MTFS), an ongoing, longitudinal study of 3762 (52% female) twins (1881 pairs).MeasurementsAlcohol use problems were assessed using a composite measure of average number of drinks per occasion in the past 12 months, maximum number of drinks in 24 hours and DSM‐III‐R symptoms of alcohol abuse and dependence. Antisocial peer affiliation was measured by self‐report of the proportion of one’s friends who exhibited types of antisocial behaviors.FindingsThe LBM‐SR model revealed that there was a large correlation between the growth factors for alcohol use problems and antisocial peer affiliation [r = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.76, 0.80] and cross‐lagged effects consistent with both selection and socialization effects. Additionally, antisocial peer affiliation in adolescence was associated with greater increases in alcohol use problems over time (r = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.54, 0.60). Genetic influences largely accounted for the association between antisocial peer affiliation in pre‐adolescence and growth in alcohol use problems, while shared environmental influences accounted for the correlation between antisocial peer affiliation and alcohol use problems growth factors.ConclusionsAntisocial peer affiliation in adolescence appears to be a salient, genetically influenced risk factor for early alcohol use and increase in alcohol use from adolescence to young adulthood.
dc.publisherPsychology Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherco‐development
dc.subject.otherheritability
dc.subject.otherpeers
dc.subject.otherselection
dc.subject.othersocialization
dc.subject.otherAlcohol
dc.titleCo‐development of alcohol use problems and antisocial peer affiliation from ages 11 to 34: selection, socialization and genetic and environmental influences
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168476/1/add15402_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168476/2/add15402.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/add.15402
dc.identifier.sourceAddiction
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSieving R. E., Perry C. L., Williams C. L. Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents’ alcohol use. J Adolesc Health 2000; 26: 27 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChassin L., Pitts S. C., Prost J. Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood in a high‐risk sample: predictors and substance abuse outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 67 – 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulenberg J., O’Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Wadsworth K. N., Johnston L. D. Getting drunk and growing up: trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to young adulthood. J Stud Alcohol 1996; 57: 289 – 304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker J. S., Orlando M., Ellickson P. L. Patterns and correlates of binge drinking trajectories from early adolescence to young adulthood. Health Psychol 2003; 22: 79 – 87.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBachman J. G., O’Malley P. M., Schulenberg J. E., Johnston L. D., Bryant A. L., Merline A. C. The Decline of Substance Use in Young Adulthood: Changes in Social Activities, Roles, and Beliefs. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaggs J. L., Schulenberg J. E. Trajectories of alcohol use during the transition to adulthood. Alcohol Res Health 2004; 28: 195 – 201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrington D. P. Conduct disorder, aggression, and delinquency. Handbk Adolesc Psychol 2004; 2: 627 – 664.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRulison K. L., Patrick M. E., Maggs J. L. Linking peer relationships to substance use across adolescence. In: Zucker R. A., Brown S. A., editors. The Oxford Handbook of Adolescent Substance Abuse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2019, pp. 389 – 420.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurran P. J., Stice E., Chassin L. The relation between adolescent alcohol use and peer alcohol use: a longitudinal random coefficients model. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997; 65: 130 – 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKendler K. S., Baker J. H. Genetic influences on measures of the environment: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2007; 37: 615 – 626.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerhulst B., Neale M. C., Kendler K. S. The heritability of alcohol use disorders: a meta‐analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychol Med 2015; 45: 1061 – 1072.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler T., Shelton K., Lifford K., Rice F., McBride A., Nikolov I., et al. Genetic and environmental influences on the relationship between peer alcohol use and own alcohol use in adolescents. Addiction 2007; 102: 894 – 903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamek D. R., Hicks B. M., Keyes M. A., Iacono W. G., McGue M. Antisocial peer affiliation and externalizing disorders: evidence for gene × environment × development interaction. Dev Psychopathol 2017; 29: 155 – 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrell A. D. Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62: 477 – 487.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoelen E. A. P., Scholte R. H. J., Willemsen G., Boomsma D. I., Engels R. C. M. E. Drinking by parents, siblings, and friends as predictors of regular alcohol use in adolescents and young adults: a longitudinal twin‐family study. Alcohol Alcohol 2007; 42: 362 – 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobkin P. L., Tremblay R. E., M-sse L. C., Vitaro F. Individual and peer characteristics in predicting Boys’ early onset of substance abuse: a seven‐year longitudinal study. Child Dev 1995; 66: 1198 – 1214.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher L. A., Bauman K. E. Influence and selection in the friend–adolescent relationship: findings from studies of adolescent smoking and Drinking1. J Appl Soc Psychol 1988; 18: 289 – 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteglich C., Tab S., Pearson M. Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociol Methodol 2010; 40: 329 – 393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrews J. A., Tildesley E., Hops H., Li F. The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychol 2002; 21: 349 – 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonahan K. C., Steinberg L., Cauffman E. Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Dev Psychol 2009; 45: 1520 – 1530.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScarr S., McCartney K. How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype→ environment effects. Child Dev 1983; 54: 424 – 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamek D. R., Goodman R. J., Erath S. A., McGue M., Iacono W. G. Antisocial peer affiliation and externalizing disorders in the transition from adolescence to young adulthood: selection versus socialization effects. Dev Psychol 2016; 52: 813 – 823.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurran P. J., Howard A. L., Bainter S., Lane S. T., McGinley J. S. The separation of between‐person and within‐person components of individual change over time: a latent curve model with structured residuals. J Consult Clin Psychol 2014; 82: 879 – 894.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIacono W. G., Carlson S. R., Taylor J., Elkins I. J., McGue M. Behavioral disinhibition and the development of substance‐use disorders: findings from the Minnesota twin family study. Dev Psychopathol 1999; 11: 869 – 900.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeyes M. A., Malone S. M., Elkins I. J., Legrand L. N., McGue M., Iacono W. G. The enrichment study of the Minnesota twin family study: increasing the yield of twin families at high risk for externalizing psychopathology. Twin Res Hum Genet 2009; 12: 489 – 501.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGue M., Zhang Y., Miller M. B., Basu S., Vrieze S., Hicks B., et al. A genome‐wide association study of behavioral disinhibition. Behav Genet 2013; 43: 363 – 373.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalk C. F. Are robust standard errors the best approach for interval estimation with nonnormal data in structural equation modeling? Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 2018; 25: 244 – 266.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerry D., Willoughby M. T. On the practical interpretability of cross‐lagged panel models: rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Dev 2017; 88: 1186 – 1206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards A. C., Maes H. H., Prescott C. A., Kendler K. S. Multiple mechanisms influencing the relationship between alcohol consumption and peer alcohol use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2015; 39: 324 – 332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBabor T. F., Higgins‐Biddle J. C., Saunders J. B., Monteiro M. G. AUDIT. Alcohol use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuthen L. Mplus Version 8 User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison P. D. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirisci L., Tarter R., Mezzich A., Vanyukov M. Developmental trajectory classes in substance use disorder etiology. Psychol Addict Behav 2007; 21: 287 – 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlory K., Lynam D., Milich R., Leukefeld C., Clayton R. Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility. Dev Psychopathol 2004; 16. Available at: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0954579404044475 (accessed 3 November 2019).
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
add15402_am.pdf
Size:
535.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
add15402.pdf
Size:
1.040MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.