Show simple item record

Impact of Decipher on use of post- operative radiotherapy: Individual patient analysis of two prospective registries

dc.contributor.authorShahait, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Vinnie Y. T.
dc.contributor.authorVapiwala, Neha
dc.contributor.authorLal, Priti
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorTrabulsi, Eduard J.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Huei‐chung
dc.contributor.authorDavicioni, Elai
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Darby J. S.
dc.contributor.authorSpratt, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDen, Robert B.
dc.contributor.authorLee, David I.
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T18:15:37Z
dc.date.available2022-08-03 14:15:36en
dc.date.available2021-08-03T18:15:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.identifier.citationShahait, Mohammed; Liu, Vinnie Y. T.; Vapiwala, Neha; Lal, Priti; Kim, Jessica; Trabulsi, Eduard J.; Huang, Huei‐chung ; Davicioni, Elai; Thompson, Darby J. S.; Spratt, Daniel; Den, Robert B.; Lee, David I. (2021). "Impact of Decipher on use of post- operative radiotherapy: Individual patient analysis of two prospective registries." BJUI Compass 2(4): 267-274.
dc.identifier.issn2688-4526
dc.identifier.issn2688-4526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/168482
dc.description.abstractObjectiveTo assess the association between Genomic Classifier (GC)- risk group and post- radical prostatectomy treatment in clinical practice.MethodsTwo prospective observational cohorts of men with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent RP in two referral centers and had GC testing post- prostatectomy between 2013 and 2018 were included. The primary endpoint of the study was to assess the association between GC- risk group and time to secondary therapy. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess the association between GC- risk group and time to receipt of secondary therapy after RP, where secondary therapy is defined as receiving either RT or ADT after RP.ResultsA total of 398 patients are included in the analysis. Patients with high- GC risk were more likely to receive any secondary therapy (OR: 6.84) compared to patients with low/intermediate- GC risk. The proportion of high- GC risk patients receiving RT at 2 years post- RP was 31.5%, compared to only 6.3% among the low/intermediate- GC risk patients.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that physicians in routine practice used GC to identify high risk patients who might benefit the most from secondary treatment. As such, GC score was independent predictor of receipt of secondary treatment.
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherradiation
dc.subject.otherprostate cancer
dc.subject.otherbiomarkers
dc.titleImpact of Decipher on use of post- operative radiotherapy: Individual patient analysis of two prospective registries
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelUrology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168482/1/bco270_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168482/2/bco270.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bco2.70
dc.identifier.sourceBJUI Compass
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson IM, Valicenti RK, Albertsen P, et al. Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: AUA/ASTRO guideline. J Urol. 2013; 190 ( 2 ): 441 - 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSineshaw HM, Gray PJ, Efstathiou JA, Jemal A. Declining use of radiotherapy for adverse features after radical prostatectomy: results from the National Cancer Data Base. Eur Urol. 2015; 68 ( 5 ): 768 - 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltman DG, McShane LM, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE. Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration. BMC Med. 2012; 10 ( 1 ): 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHager B, Kraywinkel K, Keck B, et al. Increasing use of radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer in the USA and Germany: a comparative population- based study. Prost Cancer Prost Dis. 2017; 20 ( 1 ): 61 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBriganti A, Karnes RJ, Gandaglia G, et al. Natural history of surgically treated high- risk prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2015; 33 ( 4 ): 163.e7 - 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.018
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 296 ( 19 ): 2329 - 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, et al. European organisation for research and treatment of cancer, radiation oncology and genito- urinary groups. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high- risk prostate cancer: long- term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012; 380 ( 9858 ): 2018 - 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, et al. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate- specific antigen: ARO 96- 02/AUO AP 09/95. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27 ( 18 ): 2924 - 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent- Update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014; 65 ( 1 ): 124 - 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate cancer (version 3.2018). Available from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDalela D, Santiago- Jiménez M, Yousefi K, et al. Genomic classifier augments the role of pathological features in identifying optimal candidates for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: development and internal validation of a multivariable prognostic model. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35 ( 18 ): 1982.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVale CL, Brihoum M, Chabaud S, et al. Adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer? A prospectively planned aggregate data meta- analysis. Ann Oncol. 2019; 1 ( 30 ): v883.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson WC, Suresh K, Tumati V, et al. Impact of biochemical failure after salvage radiation therapy on prostate cancer- specific mortality: competition between age and time to biochemical failure. Europ Urol Oncol. 2018; 1 ( 4 ): 276 - 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGore JL, du Plessis M, Santiago- Jiménez M, Yousefi K, Thompson DJ, Karsh L, et al. Decipher test impacts decision making among patients considering adjuvant and salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy: interim results from the Multicenter Prospective PRO- IMPACT study. Cancer. 2017; 123 ( 15 ): 2850 - 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFirth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika. 1993; 1: 27 - 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang Z, Reinikainen J, Adeleke KA, Pieterse ME, Groothuis- Oudshoorn CG. Time- varying covariates and coefficients in Cox regression models. Ann Transl Med. 2018; 6 ( 7 ): 121 - 1. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.02.12
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin DY, Ying Z. Cox regression with incomplete covariate measurements. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993; 88 ( 424 ): 1341 - 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient- level meta- analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high- risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35 ( 18 ): 1991.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966; 50: 163 - 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDen RB, Yousefi K, Trabulsi EJ, et al. Genomic classifier identifies men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy who benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33 ( 8 ): 944.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. In Breakthroughs in statistics (pp. 66 - 70 ). New York, NY: Springer; 1992.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooperberg MR, Hilton JF, Carroll PR. The CAPRA- S score: a straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2011; 117 ( 22 ): 5039 - 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlein EA, Haddad Z, Yousefi K, et al. Decipher genomic classifier measured on prostate biopsy predicts metastasis risk. Urology. 2016; 1 ( 90 ): 148 - 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prost Cancer Prost Dis. 2020; 23 ( 2 ): 295 - 302.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearse M, Fraser- Browne C, Davis ID, et al. A Phase III trial to investigate the timing of radiotherapy for prostate cancer with high- risk features: background and rationale of the Radiotherapy- Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) trial. BJU Int. 2014; 113: 7 - 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichaud P, Sargos P, Henriques de Figueiredo B, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Cancer Radiother. 2010; 14 ( 6- 7 ): 500 - 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker C. (RADICALS Trial Management Group). Radiotherapy and androgen deprivation in combination after local surgery (RADICALS): a new Medical Research Council/National Cancer Institute of Canada phase III trial of adjuvant treatment after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007; 99: 1376 - 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCianflone F, Martini A, Bandini M, et al. Trend of use of adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy and impact on long- term outcomes: results from three high volume centers over the last two decades. Europ Urol Suppl. 2018; 17 ( 8 ): 332 - 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallis CJ, Morton G, Jerath A, et al. Adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy for patients with adverse pathological findings following radical prostatectomy: a decision analysis. MDM Policy Pract. 2017; 2 ( 1 ): 2381468317709476.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall MD, Schultheiss TE, Farino G, Wong JY.Increase in higher risk prostate cancer cases following new screening recommendation by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.