View Item 

Show simple item record

Predicting mandibular growth based on CVM stage and gender and with chronological age as a curvilinear variable
dc.contributor.authorFranchi, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorNieri, Michele
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, James A.
dc.contributor.authorGiuntini, Veronica
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-03T18:17:39Z
dc.date.available2022-09-03 14:17:37en
dc.date.available2021-08-03T18:17:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.identifier.citationFranchi, Lorenzo; Nieri, Michele; McNamara, James A.; Giuntini, Veronica (2021). "Predicting mandibular growth based on CVM stage and gender and with chronological age as a curvilinear variable." Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research (3): 414-420.
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335
dc.identifier.issn1601-6343
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/168526
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a prediction model that combines the information derived from chronological age (analysed as a curvilinear variable), gender and the CVM method to predict mandibular growth.Settings and Sample Population50 participants (29 females, 21 males) were selected from the AAOF Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection, the Michigan Growth Study and the Denver Child Growth study.Materials and MethodsIn this investigation, 456 lateral cephalograms were analysed by applying a mixed effect model. The outcome variable was the annualized increment in total mandibular length (Co‐Gn) during the year following the lateral cephalogram on which the cervical stage and chronological age were evaluated. The predictive variables were chronological age up to the fifth order, gender, stage of cervical vertebral maturation, as well as interactions between age and gender, age and cervical stage, and gender and cervical stage.ResultsCervical stage, chronological age up to the fourth order, gender, and the interaction between age and gender were significant predictors of annualized increments in mandibular length. The annualized increment in Co‐Gn was significantly greater for CS 3 when compared to all other cervical stages. Further, annualized increments in Co‐Gn for CS 1 and CS 2 were significantly greater when compared to CS 5.ConclusionsCervical stage, chronological age and gender can be used jointly to predict the annualized increment in mandibular growth. Cervical stage 3 exhibited the greatest annualized increase in mandibular length.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titlePredicting mandibular growth based on CVM stage and gender and with chronological age as a curvilinear variable
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168526/1/ocr12457_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168526/2/ocr12457.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12457
dc.identifier.sourceOrthodontics & Craniofacial Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray S, Bennani H, Kieser JA, Farella M. Morphometric analysis of cervical vertebrae in relation to mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149 ( 1 ): 92 ‐ 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11 ( 3 ): 119 ‐ 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. The cervical vertebral maturation method: a user’s guide. Angle Orthod. 2018; 88 ( 2 ): 133 ‐ 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Reilly M, Yanniello GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae–a longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 1988; 58 ( 2 ): 179 ‐ 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118 ( 3 ): 335 ‐ 340.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCericato GO, Bittencourt MAV, Paranhos LR. Validity of the assessment method of skeletal maturation by cervical vertebrae: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015; 44 ( 4 ): 20140270.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerinetti G, Contardo L, Castaldo A, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Diagnostic reliability of the cervical vertebral maturation method and standing height in the identification of the mandibular growth spurt. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86 ( 4 ): 599 ‐ 609.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosni S, Burnside G, Watkinson S, Harrison JE. Comparison of statural height growth velocity at different cervical vertebral maturation stages. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018; 154 ( 4 ): 545 ‐ 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzemraj A, Wojtaszek‐Słomińska A, Racka‐Pilszak B. Is the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method effective enough to replace the hand‐wrist maturation (HWM) method in determining skeletal maturation?‐A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2018; 102: 125 ‐ 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngel TP, Renkema AM, Katsaros C, Pazera P, Pandis N, Fudalej PS. The cervical vertebrae maturation (CVM) method cannot predict craniofacial growth in girls with Class II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38 ( 1 ): 1 ‐ 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerinetti G, Contardo L, Primožič J. Diagnostic accuracy of the cervical vertebral maturation method. Eur J Orthod. 2018; 40 ( 4 ): 453 ‐ 454.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontasser MA. Craniofacial growth spurt in Class I subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 155 ( 4 ): 473 ‐ 481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris KM, Fields HW Jr, Beck FM, Kim DG. Diagnostic testing of cervical vertebral maturation staging: an independent assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156 ( 5 ): 626 ‐ 632.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162 ( 1 ): W1 ‐ W73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33 ( 1 ): 159 ‐ 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGabriel DB, Southard KA, Qian F, Marshall SD, Franciscus RG, Southard TE. Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136 ( 4 ): 478.e1‐7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhajah A, Tadinada A, Allareddy V, Kuo CL, Nanda R, Uribe F. Influence of type of radiograph and levels of experience and training on reproducibility of the cervical vertebral maturation method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 157 ( 2 ): 228 ‐ 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAksglaede L, Olsen LW, Sorensen TI, Juul A. Forty years trends in timing of pubertal growth spurt in 157,000 Danish school children. PLoS One. 2008; 3: e2728.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatcas R, Wiedemeier DB, Markic G, Beit P, Keller H. Evidence of secular trend in mandibular pubertal growth. Eur J Orthod. 2017; 39 ( 6 ): 680 ‐ 685.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerinetti G, Primožič J, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in pre‐pubertal and pubertal Class II patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled studies. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0141198.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerinetti G, Primožič J, Furlani G, Franchi L, Contardo L. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances alone or in combination with multibracket appliances: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85 ( 3 ): 480 ‐ 492.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePavoni C, Lombardo EC, Lione R, et al. Treatment timing for functional jaw orthopaedics followed by fixed appliances: a controlled long‐term study. Eur J Orthod. 2018; 40 ( 4 ): 430 ‐ 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBjörk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963; 42 ( 1 ): 400 ‐ 411.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBjörk A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1964; 40: 49 ‐ 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunter CJ. The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1966; 36 ( 1 ): 44 ‐ 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis A, Roche AF, Wagner B. Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible. Comparisons within individuals. Angle Orthod. 1985; 55 ( 1 ): 17 ‐ 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBjörk A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum pubertal growth in body height. Angle Orthod. 1967; 37 ( 2 ): 134 ‐ 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellion ZJ, Behrents RG, Johnston LE Jr. The pattern of facial skeletal growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143 ( 6 ): 845 ‐ 854.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand‐wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982; 52 ( 2 ): 88 ‐ 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlores‐Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Use of skeletal maturation based on hand‐wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74 ( 1 ): 118 ‐ 124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107 ( 1 ): 58 ‐ 66.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ocr12457_am.pdf
Size:
427.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ocr12457.pdf
Size:
738.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.