Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery
dc.contributor.author | Barootchi, Shayan | |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Hsun-Liang | |
dc.contributor.author | Namazi, Sharon | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Hom-Lay | |
dc.contributor.author | Kripfgans, Oliver | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-24T21:22:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-24T21:22:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Clin Oral Impl Res. 2020;31:352–359 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.13573 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/169151 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Increased applications of ridge augmentation in the lingual posterior mandible call for an urgent need to study its anatomy. Therefore, our first aim was to validate ultrasound in measuring the mandibular lingual structures in human cadavers. Secondarily, to test its feasibility in imaging the lingual nerve in live humans. Materials and methods: Nine fresh un-embalmed fully/partially edentulous cadaver heads were utilized for aim 1. Three areas in the lingual mandible were imaged (mandibular premolar, molar, and retromolar). Immediately after, biopsies were harvested from each site. The thickness of the mucosa, mylohyoid muscle, and lingual nerve diameter was measured via ultrasound and statistically compared to histology. Similarly, the lingual nerve in live humans was also imaged. Results: None of the differences between the ultrasound and histology measurements reached statistical significance (p > .05). The mean mucosal thickness via ultrasound and histology was 1.45 ± 0.49 and 1.39 ± 0.50 mm, 5 mm lingual to the mylohyoid muscle attachment. At 10 mm beyond the attachment, the ultrasound and histologic values were 1.54 ± 0.48 and 1.37 ± 0.49, respectively. The mean muscle thickness measured via ultrasound and histology was 2.31 ± 0.56 and 2.25 ± 0.47 mm, at the 5 mm distance. At the 10 mm distance, the measurements were 2.46 ± 0.56 and 2.36 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean ultrasonic lingual nerve diameter was 2.38 ± 0.44 mm, versus 2.43 ± 0.42 mm, with histology. The lingual nerve diameter on 19 live humans averaged to 2.01 ± 0.35 mm (1.4-3.1 mm). Conclusions: Within its limitations, ultrasound accurately measured mandibular lingual soft tissue structures on cadavers, and the lingual nerve on live humans. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Delta Dental Foundation (PAF01878) | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Osteology Foundation (PAF06301) | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (1R21DE027765) | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.subject | Periodontics | en_US |
dc.subject | Ultrasound | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental implants | en_US |
dc.title | Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31925829 | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/169151/1/Barootchi et al. 2020 Ultrasound.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/clr.13573 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/2318 | |
dc.identifier.source | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-6577 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-0447 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Barootchi et al. 2020 Ultrasound.pdf : Full text of published article | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | CHAN, HSUN-LIANG; 0000-0001-5952-0447 | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Barootchi, Shayan; 0000-0002-5347-6577 | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.1111/clr.13573 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dentistry, School of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.