Show simple item record

Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery

dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun-Liang
dc.contributor.authorNamazi, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.contributor.authorKripfgans, Oliver
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T21:22:38Z
dc.date.available2021-08-24T21:22:38Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-27
dc.identifier.citationClin Oral Impl Res. 2020;31:352–359en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.13573
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/169151en
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Increased applications of ridge augmentation in the lingual posterior mandible call for an urgent need to study its anatomy. Therefore, our first aim was to validate ultrasound in measuring the mandibular lingual structures in human cadavers. Secondarily, to test its feasibility in imaging the lingual nerve in live humans. Materials and methods: Nine fresh un-embalmed fully/partially edentulous cadaver heads were utilized for aim 1. Three areas in the lingual mandible were imaged (mandibular premolar, molar, and retromolar). Immediately after, biopsies were harvested from each site. The thickness of the mucosa, mylohyoid muscle, and lingual nerve diameter was measured via ultrasound and statistically compared to histology. Similarly, the lingual nerve in live humans was also imaged. Results: None of the differences between the ultrasound and histology measurements reached statistical significance (p > .05). The mean mucosal thickness via ultrasound and histology was 1.45 ± 0.49 and 1.39 ± 0.50 mm, 5 mm lingual to the mylohyoid muscle attachment. At 10 mm beyond the attachment, the ultrasound and histologic values were 1.54 ± 0.48 and 1.37 ± 0.49, respectively. The mean muscle thickness measured via ultrasound and histology was 2.31 ± 0.56 and 2.25 ± 0.47 mm, at the 5 mm distance. At the 10 mm distance, the measurements were 2.46 ± 0.56 and 2.36 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The mean ultrasonic lingual nerve diameter was 2.38 ± 0.44 mm, versus 2.43 ± 0.42 mm, with histology. The lingual nerve diameter on 19 live humans averaged to 2.01 ± 0.35 mm (1.4-3.1 mm). Conclusions: Within its limitations, ultrasound accurately measured mandibular lingual soft tissue structures on cadavers, and the lingual nerve on live humans.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDelta Dental Foundation (PAF01878)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOsteology Foundation (PAF06301)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (1R21DE027765)en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectPeriodonticsen_US
dc.subjectUltrasounden_US
dc.subjectDental implantsen_US
dc.titleUltrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid31925829
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/169151/1/Barootchi et al. 2020 Ultrasound.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13573
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/2318
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-6577en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-0447en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Barootchi et al. 2020 Ultrasound.pdf : Full text of published article
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidCHAN, HSUN-LIANG; 0000-0001-5952-0447en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidBarootchi, Shayan; 0000-0002-5347-6577en_US
dc.working.doi10.1111/clr.13573en_US
dc.owningcollnameDentistry, School of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.