Implant soft tissue Dehiscence coverage Esthetic Score (IDES): A pilot within- and between-rater analysis of consistency in objective and subjective scores
dc.contributor.author | Zucchelli, Giovanni | |
dc.contributor.author | Barootchi, Shayan | |
dc.contributor.author | Tavelli, Lorenzo | |
dc.contributor.author | Stefanini, Martina | |
dc.contributor.author | Rasperini, Giulio | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Hom-Lay | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-24T21:40:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-24T21:40:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;32:349–358. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.13706 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/169153 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To introduce an esthetic index for assessing the outcomes of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiency (PSTD) coverage and test its within- and between-reviewer reliability. Materials and methods: Photographs of 51 single PSTDs at baseline and after treatment were provided to four periodontists from three centers. The examiners were asked to rate each case at two timepoints with the Implant soft tissue Dehiscence/deficiency coverage Esthetic Score (IDES) that involved the evaluation of the post-treatment level of the soft tissue margin, peri-implant papillae height, mucosa color, and mucosa appearance (summing up to a total score of 10). Variance components analysis was conducted using multilevel regression fit in a Bayesian framework for obtaining uncertainty intervals for fractional variance contributions and intraclass correlation values (ICC) of the IDES, and for each of its four clinical variables. Results: Regression models showed reproducible esthetic evaluation among the examiners (inter-reliability) and negligible intra-reviewer variability (assessment of the same case at different timepoints). The ICC for the variability in the assessment of the overall IDES was 0.86, and for the individual components ranged from 0.78 to 0.87. Additionally, there was a strong similarity between the raters' IDES values, and their subjective esthetic response, by the same raters. Conclusion: The IDES showed persistent judgment among the 4 reviewers, and only a slight intra-reviewer variability across timepoints. Within its limitations, this study suggests that the proposed novel score can be a reliable tool for evaluating the esthetic outcomes of PSTD coverage, which can aid in standardization of esthetic assessments following the treatment of a PSTD. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.subject | Periodontics | en_US |
dc.subject | Dental implants | en_US |
dc.subject | evidence-based dentistry | en_US |
dc.title | Implant soft tissue Dehiscence coverage Esthetic Score (IDES): A pilot within- and between-rater analysis of consistency in objective and subjective scores | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Dentistry | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 33420729 | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/169153/1/Zucchelli, Barootchi et al. 2021 IDES.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/clr.13706 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/2320 | |
dc.identifier.source | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-6577 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-3964 | en_US |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Barootchi, Shayan; 0000-0002-5347-6577 | en_US |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Tavelli, Lorenzo; 0000-0003-4864-3964 | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.1111/clr.13706 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dentistry, School of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.