View Item 

Show simple item record

Collaboratively engineering for justice in sixth grade STEM
dc.contributor.authorCalabrese Barton, Angela
dc.contributor.authorSchenkel, Kathleen
dc.contributor.authorTan, Edna
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T14:37:46Z
dc.date.available2022-10-08 10:37:45en
dc.date.available2021-09-08T14:37:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.citationCalabrese Barton, Angela; Schenkel, Kathleen; Tan, Edna (2021). "Collaboratively engineering for justice in sixth grade STEM." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58(7): 1010-1040.
dc.identifier.issn0022-4308
dc.identifier.issn1098-2736
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/169344
dc.description.abstractIn this article, it is argued that processes of co‐production can support teachers and students in organizing resources for justice through science learning. Drawing upon a critical justice conceptual framework, critical ethnographic data from one urban middle school classroom during a unit focused on engineering for sustainable communities were analyzed. Findings describe how processes of co‐production yielded new Discourse threads focused on sustainability, whose ideas matter, and empathy, which were embodied in students’ engineered artifacts and how students talked about using those artifacts. Such embodiment positioned students as rightfully present and powerful experts in science and engineering. We discuss how processes of co‐production supported justice by supporting new social relationships between the teacher and students that helped to make space for collective engagement of students’ political struggles against the oppressive practices of schooling as an integral part of science learning.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherequity
dc.subject.otherscience
dc.subject.otherpedagogy
dc.subject.otherlearning
dc.subject.otherjustice
dc.subject.othersociocultural
dc.subject.otherethnography
dc.subject.otherengineering
dc.titleCollaboratively engineering for justice in sixth grade STEM
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagement
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen’s and Gender Studies
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanities
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/169344/1/tea21691.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/169344/2/tea21691_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.21691
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teaching
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitchell, K., & Elwood, S. ( 2012 ). From redlining to benevolent societies: The emancipatory power of spatial thinking. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40 ( 2 ), 134 – 163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.674867
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharmaz, K. ( 2017 ). The power of constructivist grounded theory for critical inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23 ( 1 ), 34 – 45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416657105
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrenshaw, K. W. ( 1989 ). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist Critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. ( 2017 ). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101 ( 3 ), 486 – 505. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21271
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham, C. M., & Carlsen, W. S. ( 2014 ). Teaching engineering practices. Journal of science teacher education, 25 ( 2 ), 197 – 210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9380-5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, N., & Schaeffer, J. ( 2017 ). Troubling troubled waters in elementary science education. Cognition and Instruction, 37 ( 3 ), 367 – 389. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624548
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Saint‐Georges, I. ( 2004 ). Materiality in discourse: The influence of space and layout in making meaning. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.). Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, Pp. 71 – 87. Georgetown University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsmonde, I., & Booker, A. N. (Eds.). ( 2016 ). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. Taylor & Francis.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGee, J. P. ( 2006 ). Oral discourse in a world of literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 41 ( 2 ), 153 – 159.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGholson, M., & Martin, D. B. ( 2014 ). Smart girls, Black girls, mean girls, and bullies: At the intersection of identities and the mediating role of young girls’ social network in mathematical communities of practice. Journal of Education, 194 ( 1 ), 19 – 33. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741419400105
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunkel, K. L., & Tolbert, S. ( 2018 ). The imperative toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 938 – 961. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21458
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaynes, C., Stewart, S., & Allen, E. ( 2016 ). Three paths, one struggle: Black women and girls battling invisibility in US classrooms. The Journal of Negro Education, 85 ( 3 ), 380 – 391. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.3.0380
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHicks, J., Jennings, L., Jennings, S., Berry, S., & Green, D. A. ( 2018 ). Middle school bullying: Student reported perceptions and prevalence. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 4 ( 3 ), 195 – 208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2017.1422645
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLadson‐Billings, G. ( 2006 ). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35 ( 7 ), 3 – 12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. ( 2016 ). User and community co‐production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39 ( 13 ), 1006 – 1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouie, N. ( 2020 ). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38 ( 1 ), 1 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMassey, D. ( 2005 ). For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitlin, D. ( 2008 ). With and beyond the state: Co‐production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20 ( 2 ), 339 – 360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Kersten, J. A. ( 2015 ). NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K‐12 state science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52 ( 3 ), 296 – 318. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21199
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorales‐Doyle, D. ( 2017 ). Justice‐centered science pedagogy: A catalyst for academic achievement and social transformation. Science Education, 101 ( 6 ), 1034 – 1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21305
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNasir, N. I. S., & Vakil, S. ( 2017 ). STEM‐focused academies in urban schools: Tensions and possibilities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26 ( 3 ), 376 – 406. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1314215
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council. ( 2010 ). Engineering, social justice, and sustainable community development. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOsborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., Kinder, T., & Vidal, I. ( 2015 ). The SERVICE framework: A public‐service‐dominant approach to sustainable public services. British Journal of Management, 26 ( 3 ), 424 – 438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12094
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaman, S., French, T., & Tulloch, A. ( 2017 ). Design‐led approach to co‐production of values for collective decision‐making. The Design Journal, 20 ( sup1 ), S4331 – S4342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352930
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubel, L. H., Lim, V. Y., Hall‐Wieckert, M., & Sullivan, M. ( 2016 ). Teaching mathematics for spatial justice: An investigation of the lottery. Cognition and Instruction, 34 ( 1 ), 1 – 26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2015.1118691
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSecules, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Tanu, E. ( 2018 ). Supporting the narrative agency of a marginalized engineering student. Journal of Engineering Education, 107 ( 2 ), 186 – 218. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20201
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, J. J. A. ( 2020 ). Lefebvre and law: Social justice, new technologies and the spatial imaginary. In M. E. Leary‐Owhin & J. P. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of Henri Lefebvre, the City and Urban Society (pp. 187 – 206 ). Oxford: Routledge.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoja, E. W. ( 2010 ). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTolbert, S., & Bazzul, J. ( 2017 ). Toward the sociopolitical in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12 ( 2 ), 321 – 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatkins, J. ( 2015 ). Spatial imaginaries research in geography: Synergies, tensions, and new directions. Geography Compass, 9 ( 9 ), 508 – 522. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12228
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson, V. ( 2014 ). Co‐production and collaboration in planning: The difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 15 ( 1 ), 62 – 76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.866266
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeis, L., & Fine, M. ( 2012 ). Critical bifocality and circuits of privilege: Expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harvard Educational Review, 82 ( 2 ), 173 – 201. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.2.v1jx34n441532242
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrecht, L., Barbanente, A., & Monno, V. ( 2019 ). From stage‐managed planning towards a more imaginative and inclusive strategic spatial planning. Environment and Planning, 37 ( 8 ), 1489 – 1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419825655
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnamma, S. A., & Handy, T. ( 2020 ). Sharpening justice through DisCrit: A contrapuntal analysis of education. Educational Researcher, 50 ( 1 ), 41 – 50. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20953838
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalibar, E., Mezzadra, S., & Samaddar, R. ( 2012 ). Borders of Justice. Temple University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Medin, D. ( 2012 ). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55 ( 5–6 ), 302 – 318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates, L. K., Towne, S. A., Jordan, C. P., Lelliott, K. L., Bates, L. K., Towne, S. A., … Winkler, T. ( 2018 ). Race and spatial imaginary. Planning Theory & Practice, 19 ( 2 ), 254 – 288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456816
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBell, D. M., & Pahl, K. ( 2018 ). Co‐production: Towards a utopian approach. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21 ( 1 ), 105 – 117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. ( 2019 ). Designing for rightful presence in STEM: Community ethnography as pedagogy as an equity‐oriented design approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28 ( 4‐5 ), 616 – 658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1591411
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. ( 2020 ). Beyond equity as inclusion: A framework of ’rightful presence’ for guiding justice‐oriented studies in teaching and learning. Educational Researcher, 49 ( 6 ), 433 – 440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20927363
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalabrese Barton, A., & Yang, K. ( 2000 ). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 ( 8 ), 871 – 889.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCammarota, J., & Fine, M. ( 2010 ). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York and London: Routledge.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
tea21691.pdf
Size:
3.347MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
tea21691_am.pdf
Size:
512.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.