Show simple item record

Assessing Social, Ecological, and Nutritional Outcomes of Crop Diversification: Transitions to Agroecological Management in Southern Brazil

dc.contributor.authorStratton, Anne
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-24T19:05:33Z
dc.date.available2021-09-24T19:05:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/169672
dc.description.abstractGlobal industrial agriculture drives worsening environmental and public health crises, prompting a search for transformative agricultural approaches that can maintain productivity while increasing social and environmental sustainability. One paradigm gaining traction is agroecology, a science, set of management practices, and social movement. Agroecological management applies ecological knowledge to manage crop diversity on farms (i.e., agroecosystems) and increase multiple functions, including soil nutrient cycling and crop productivity. However, due to the vast heterogeneity of farm management systems and environmental conditions, we lack a mechanistic understanding of transitions to agroecological management, or “agroecological transitions,” and their outcomes. This dissertation develops and applies an interdisciplinary approach to analyze the processes and outcomes of agroecological transitions on family farms in southern Brazil. Chapter 1 provides a conceptual framework for assessing social, ecological, and nutritional functions of agroecosystems across stages of the transition process and introduces the remaining chapters. Chapter 2 focuses on social outcomes of agroecological transitions. I analyzed qualitative and quantitative management and socioeconomic data from 14 farms along an agroecological transition gradient to understand how changing management practices relate to farm income and working conditions. I found that agroecological farms (>5 years certified) achieved income parity and improved working conditions compared to conventional farms in the region. Farms in transition (0-5 years certified), however, struggled to manage ecological processes on their newly diversified farms, which increased work difficulty and reduced profits relative to both agroecological and conventional farms. Chapter 3 examines the cascading relationships between farm management history, background soil fertility, crop diversification practices, and nitrogen cycling during agroecological transitions. I conducted a two-year experiment to test the performance of two legume-based diversification practices, cover cropping and intercropping, across the farm gradient from Chapter 2. Structural equation modeling revealed that after accounting for variation in background fertility across sites, cover crop mixtures explained a further 67% of the variation in soil nitrogen availability at vegetable planting. Consequently, benefits of diversification practices for soil nitrogen cycling were ecologically relevant across farms within the short span of our experiment, with the greatest nitrogen availability overall on agroecological farms. Intercropped cucumber and snow pea had a yield advantage relative to monocrops across the farm gradient, contributing to a mean land equivalent ratio of 1.19 overall, and 1.27 in the second year of the experiment. Chapter 4 evaluates how diversification practices affect two nutritional functions of vegetable agroecosystems. In a factorial field experiment, I studied the individual and combined effects of cover cropping and intercropping on cucumber and snow pea nutrient content and nutrient yield, including protein and six minerals. Total nutrient yield per area increased in the combined diversification treatment, driven by 5.3 times greater cucumber nutrient yield per plant compared to the control. The highest nutrient yield overall was in the cover cropped pea treatment, reflecting 11% higher protein yield per plant compared to the control. These findings provide initial evidence that diversified cropping systems can lead to agronomic biofortification of vegetable crops, particularly in low-input systems. Chapter 5 synthesizes findings from the three studies and proposes an agenda for future research on crop diversification and agroecological transitions. This integrative dissertation illustrates that agroecological transitions, and the crop diversity they employ, offer a pathway toward agriculture that upholds farms’ socioeconomic viability, bolsters key ecosystem functions including soil nutrient cycling, and produces more nutrient-rich crops.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectBrazil
dc.subjectagroecology
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjectvegetable crop nutrient content
dc.subjectfunctional diversity
dc.subjectlegume
dc.titleAssessing Social, Ecological, and Nutritional Outcomes of Crop Diversification: Transitions to Agroecological Management in Southern Brazil
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources & Environment
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberBlesh, Jennifer
dc.contributor.committeememberJones, Andrew
dc.contributor.committeememberWittman, Hannah Kay
dc.contributor.committeememberZak, Donald R
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLatin American and Caribbean Studies
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSociology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/169672/1/aestrat_1.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/2717
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3226-8311
dc.identifier.name-orcidStratton, Anne Elise; 0000-0003-3226-8311en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/2717en
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.