Show simple item record

Facial mucosal level of single immediately placed implants with either immediate provisionalization or delayed restoration: An intermediate- term study

dc.contributor.authorBushahri, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKripfgans, Oliver D.
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Furat
dc.contributor.authorWang, I‐ching
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T15:06:13Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05 11:06:11en
dc.date.available2021-10-05T15:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.citationBushahri, Ali; Kripfgans, Oliver D.; George, Furat; Wang, I‐ching ; Wang, Hom‐lay ; Chan, Hsun‐liang (2021). "Facial mucosal level of single immediately placed implants with either immediate provisionalization or delayed restoration: An intermediate- term study." Journal of Periodontology 92(9): 1213-1221.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170225
dc.description.abstractBackgroundImmediately placed single implants with either immediate provisionalization (test) or delayed restoration (control) were followed for up to 1 year in our previous randomized clinical trial. Peri- implant tissues continue to remodel after implants are in function. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the facial mucosal level changes in the intermediate term between the two groups and to study potential factors influencing the mucosal level change.MethodsPatients who had already completed the previous clinical trial by receiving a single immediately placed implant were re- invited to this study. The facial mucosal level as well as the other peri- implant hard and soft tissue dimensions and conditions were measured clinically, radiographically and with ultrasound. These data were compared between the test and control implants. The mucosal level change as the function of the final crown contour, measured as the abutment- crown angle (ACA), was estimated with a linear regression model.ResultsTwenty- eight patients (n of test/control = 16/12) with a mean 30- month follow- up were recruited. The mean mucosal level change was - 0.38 mm (control) and 0.06 mm (test), without statistical difference between the two groups. The other clinical, radiographic, and ultrasound parameters were not statistically different. ACA was statistically significant associated with the recession (P = 0.02). The estimate effect was 0.25 mm per 10° increase (adjusted R2 = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.49 mm). After adjusting for vertical implant position, implant abutment angle and the group, the effect became borderline significant (P = 0.09).ConclusionsPeri- implant tissues, including the mucosal level change of immediately placed implants with either immediate provisionalization or delayed restoration remained stable and did not differ between the groups in the intermediate term. The final crown angle, influenced by implant position and abutment angle, might be associated with mucosal margin level change.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherprostheses and implants
dc.subject.otherultrasonography
dc.subject.otheresthetics
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.othercone- beam computed tomography
dc.titleFacial mucosal level of single immediately placed implants with either immediate provisionalization or delayed restoration: An intermediate- term study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170225/1/jper10732_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170225/2/jper10732.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.20-0746
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013; 84: 1755 - 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 186 - 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged vs. non- submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 1307 - 1313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5- year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 43: 702 - 709.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate single- tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 566 - 570.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 73 - 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8- year follow- up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 179 - 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H. A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 582 - 589.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, et al. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44: 215 - 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila- Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46: 195 - 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Lin GH, Fu JH, Wang HL. Alterations in bone quality after socket preservation with grafting materials: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28: 710 - 720.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effects of currently available surgical and restorative interventions on reducing midfacial mucosal recession of immediately placed single- tooth implants: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2014; 85: 92 - 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSu H, Gonzalez- Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010; 30: 335 - 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteigmann M, Monje A, Chan HL, Wang HL. Emergence profile design based on implant position in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34: 559 - 563.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Weinstein T, Scutella F, Wang HL, Zucchelli G. Implant placement in the esthetic area: criteria for positioning single and multiple implants. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77: 176 - 196.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, George F, Wang IC, Suarez Lopez Del Amo F, Kinney J, Wang HL. A randomized controlled trial to compare clinical esthetic outcomes of immediately placed implants with and without immediate provisionalization. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46: 1061 - 1069.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967; 38: 610 - 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Sinjab K, Chung MP, et al. Non- invasive evaluation of facial crestal bone with ultrasonography. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0171237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Sinjab K, Li J, Chen Z, Wang HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonography for noninvasive and real- time evaluation of peri- implant tissue dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: 986 - 995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Wang HL, Fowlkes JB, Giannobile WV, Kripfgans OD. Non- ionizing real- time ultrasonography in implant and oral surgery: a feasibility study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 341 - 347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri- implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; 49: 20190445.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKinaia BM, Ambrosio F, Lamble M, Hope K, Shah M, Neely AL. Soft tissue changes around immediately placed implants: a systematic review and meta- analyses with at least 12 months of follow- up after functional loading. J Periodontol. 2017; 88: 876 - 886.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss SB, Pette GA, Parker WB, Hardigan P. Gingival margin changes in maxillary anterior sites after single immediate implant placement and provisionalization: a 5- year retrospective study of 47 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 127 - 134.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri- implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: a RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45: 253 - 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRompen E, Raepsaet N, Domken O, Touati B, Van Dooren E. Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: a pilot clinical study. J Prosthet dent. 2007; 97: S119 - 125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanderstuyft T, Tarce M, Sanaan B, Jacobs R, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Quirynen M. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone- beam CT due to implant blooming: an ex- vivo study. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46: 1134 - 1143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFurhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single- tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 639 - 644.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.