Show simple item record

Letermovir treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

dc.contributor.authorLinder, Kathleen A.
dc.contributor.authorKovacs, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorMullane, Kate M.
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorClark, Nina M.
dc.contributor.authorLa Hoz, Ricardo M.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Jeannina
dc.contributor.authorKotton, Camille N.
dc.contributor.authorLimaye, Ajit P.
dc.contributor.authorMalinis, Maricar
dc.contributor.authorHakki, Morgan
dc.contributor.authorMishkin, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Arnoldo Adrian
dc.contributor.authorProno, Maria Dioverti
dc.contributor.authorOstrander, Darin
dc.contributor.authorAvery, Robin
dc.contributor.authorKaul, Daniel R.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T15:09:13Z
dc.date.available2022-09-05 11:09:11en
dc.date.available2021-10-05T15:09:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.identifier.citationLinder, Kathleen A.; Kovacs, Christopher; Mullane, Kate M.; Wolfe, Cameron; Clark, Nina M.; La Hoz, Ricardo M.; Smith, Jeannina; Kotton, Camille N.; Limaye, Ajit P.; Malinis, Maricar; Hakki, Morgan; Mishkin, Aaron; Gonzalez, Arnoldo Adrian; Prono, Maria Dioverti; Ostrander, Darin; Avery, Robin; Kaul, Daniel R. (2021). "Letermovir treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients." Transplant Infectious Disease (4): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn1398-2273
dc.identifier.issn1399-3062
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170286
dc.description.abstractBackgroundFew options are available for cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in transplant recipients resistant, refractory, or intolerant to approved agents. Letermovir (LET) is approved for prophylaxis in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, but little is known about efficacy in CMV infection. We conducted an observational study to determine the patterns of use and outcome of LET treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients.MethodsPatients who received LET for treatment of CMV infection were identified at 13 transplant centers. Demographic and outcome data were collected.ResultsTwenty‐seven solid organ and 21 HCT recipients (one dual) from 13 medical centers were included. Forty‐five of 47 (94%) were treated with other agents prior to LET, and 57% had a history of prior CMV disease. Seventy‐seven percent were intolerant to other antivirals; 32% were started on LET because of resistance concerns. Among 37 patients with viral load < 1000 international units (IU)/ml at LET initiation, two experienced >1 log rise in viral load by week 12, and no deaths were attributed to CMV. Ten patients had viral load > 1000 IU/ml at LET initiation, and six of 10 (60%) had a CMV viral load < 1000 IU/ml at completion of therapy or last known value. LET was discontinued in two patients for an adverse event.ConclusionsPatients treated with LET with viral load < 1000 IU/ml had good virologic outcomes. Outcomes were mixed when LET was initiated at higher viral loads. Further studies on combination therapy or alternative LET dosing are needed.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othercytomegalovirus infection
dc.subject.otherletermovir
dc.subject.othersolid organ transplantation
dc.subject.otherstem cell transplantation
dc.titleLetermovir treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170286/1/tid13687.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170286/2/tid13687_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/tid.13687
dc.identifier.sourceTransplant Infectious Disease
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoivin G, Goyette N, Farhan M, Ives J, Elston R. Incidence of cytomegalovirus UL97 and UL54 amino acid substitutions detected after 100 or 200 days of valganciclovir prophylaxis. J Clin Virol. 2012; 53 ( 3 ): 208 – 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer SM. Extended valganciclovir prophylaxis to prevent cytomegalovirus after lung transplantation: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 152 ( 12 ): 761 – 769.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaya C, Humar A, Dominguez Ed, et al. Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4 ( 4 ): 611 – 620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLurain NS, Chou S. Antiviral drug resistance of human cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010; 23 ( 4 ): 689 – 712.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher CE, Knudsen JL, Lease ED, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of ganciclovir‐resistant cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 65 ( 1 ): 57 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAryal S, Katugaha SB, Cochrane A, et al. Single‐center experience with use of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis or treatment in thoracic organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2019; 21 ( 6 ): e13166.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStoelben S, Arns W, Renders L, et al. Preemptive treatment of Cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients with letermovir: results of a Phase 2a study. Transpl Int. 2014; 27 ( 1 ): 77 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReusser P. Randomized multicenter trial of foscarnet versus ganciclovir for preemptive therapy of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2002; 99 ( 4 ): 1159 – 1164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvery RK, Arav‐Boger R, Marr KA, et al. Outcomes in transplant recipients treated with foscarnet for ganciclovir‐resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infection. Transplantation. 2016; 100 ( 10 ): e74 – e80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoivin G, Goyette N, Rollag H, et al. Cytomegalovirus resistance in solid organ transplant recipients treated with intravenous ganciclovir or oral valganciclovir. Antivir Ther. 2009; 14 ( 5 ): 697 – 704.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHantz S, Garnier‐Geoffroy F, Mazeron M‐C, et al. Drug‐resistant cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients: a French cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010; 65 ( 12 ): 2628 – 2640.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. The third international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid‐organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2018; 102 ( 6 ): 900 – 931.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMyhre H‐A, Haug Dorenberg D, Kristiansen KI, et al. Incidence and outcomes of ganciclovir‐resistant cytomegalovirus infections in 1244 kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011; 92 ( 2 ): 217 – 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEid AJ, Arthurs SK, Deziel PJ, Wilhelm MP, Razonable RR. Emergence of drug‐resistant cytomegalovirus in the era of valganciclovir prophylaxis: therapeutic implications and outcomes. Clin Transplant. 2008; 22 ( 2 ): 162 – 170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerck. Package Insert Prevymis (letermovir). Merck. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/209939Orig1s000,209940Orig1s000lbl.pdf, February 15, 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrgan donation statistics. HRSA. Accessed August 28, 2020. https://www.organdonor.gov/statistics‐stories/statistics.html.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapanicolaou GA, Silveira FP, Langston AA, et al. Maribavir for refractory or resistant cytomegalovirus infections in hematopoietic‐cell or solid‐organ transplant recipients: a randomized, dose‐ranging, double‐blind, phase 2 study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 68 ( 8 ): 1255 – 1264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNatori Y, Alghamdi A, Husain S, et al. Clinical predictors of progression and clearance of low‐level CMV DNAemia in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2020; 22 ( 1 ): e13207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamargo JF, Kimble E, Rosa R, et al. Impact of cytomegalovirus viral load on probability of spontaneous clearance and response to preemptive therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018; 24 ( 4 ): 806 – 814.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobin C, Thiebaut A, Alain S, et al. Letermovir for secondary prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: results from the French compassionate program. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020; 26 ( 5 ): 978 – 984.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePackage Insert Foscavir (foscarnet sodium) Injection. Clinigen Healthcare. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/020068s018lbl.pdf, February 15, 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePackage Insert Vistide (cidofovir injection). Gilead Sciences. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/1999/020638s003lbl.pdf, February 15, 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarty FM, Ljungman P, Chemaly RF, et al. Letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic‐cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377 ( 25 ): 2433 – 2444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLjungman P, Schmitt M, Marty FM, et al. A mortality analysis of letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in CMV‐seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2020; 70 ( 8 ): 1525 – 1533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaul DR, Stoelben S, Cober E, et al. First report of successful treatment of multidrug‐resistant cytomegalovirus disease with the novel anti‐CMV compound AIC246. Am J Transplant. 2011; 11 ( 5 ): 1079 – 1084.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarty FM, Ljungman PT, Chemaly RF, et al. Outcomes of patients with detectable CMV DNA at randomization in the phase III trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20 ( 6 ): 1703 – 1711.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLjungman P, Boeckh M, Hirsch HH, et al. Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant patients for use in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64 ( 1 ): 87 – 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKronig I, Elkrief L, Berney T, Van Delden C, Neofytos D. Combination treatment with letermovir and ganciclovir for maintenance therapy of multidrug‐resistant CMV infection in a liver transplant recipient. Transplantation. 2020; 104 ( 8 ): e248 – e249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeit T, Munker D, Kauke T, et al. Letermovir for difficult to treat cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2020; 104 ( 2 ): 410 – 414.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner N, Strand A, Grewal DS, et al. Use of letermovir as salvage therapy for drug‐resistant cytomegalovirus retinitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019; 63 ( 3 ): e02337 ‐ 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhoompoung P, Ferreira VH, Tikkanen J, et al. Letermovir as salvage therapy for CMV infection in transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2019; 104 ( 2 ): 404 – 409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung S, Michel M, Stamminger T, Michel D. Fast breakthrough of resistant cytomegalovirus during secondary letermovir prophylaxis in a hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipient. BMC Infect Dis. 2019; 19 ( 1 ): 388.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChong PP, Teiber D, Prokesch BC, et al. Letermovir successfully used for secondary prophylaxis in a heart transplant recipient with ganciclovir‐resistant cytomegalovirus syndrome (UL97 mutation). Transpl Infect Dis. 2018; 20 ( 5 ): e12965.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCherrier L, Nasar A, Goodlet KJ, Nailor MD, Tokman S, Chou S. Emergence of letermovir resistance in a lung transplant recipient with ganciclovir‐resistant cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Transplant. 2018; 18 ( 12 ): 3060 – 3064.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.