Show simple item record

The Role of Fairness in Early Characterization of New Technologies: Effects on Selective Exposure and Risk Perception

dc.contributor.authorSong, Hwanseok
dc.contributor.authorLu, Hang
dc.contributor.authorMcComas, Katherine A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T00:44:41Z
dc.date.available2022-10-01 20:44:40en
dc.date.available2021-11-02T00:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.identifier.citationSong, Hwanseok; Lu, Hang; McComas, Katherine A. (2021). "The Role of Fairness in Early Characterization of New Technologies: Effects on Selective Exposure and Risk Perception." Risk Analysis 41(9): 1614-1629.
dc.identifier.issn0272-4332
dc.identifier.issn1539-6924
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170790
dc.description.abstractPrevious research suggests that when individuals have limited knowledge to make sense of new or emerging technologies, they may rely more on available cues, such as the fairness of those managing the risks, when developing their attitudinal and behavioral responses to the technology. To examine this further, we designed an online experiment (N = 1,042) to test the effects of risk managers’ nonoutcome fairness on individuals’ selective exposure to additional information and perceived risk. As the study context, we used the development of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), which uses drilling to tap deep underground sources of heat for district heating and electricity and remains low in familiarity among the U.S. public. The results suggest that participants who read about the fair risk manager were subsequently more likely to have positive attitudes toward EGS development. In turn, those with more positive attitudes were more likely to select and read positively valenced articles about EGS, resulting in an indirect effect of the fairness condition. Although this study also explored whether uncertainty moderated this fairness effect on information seeking, it found no evidence. Additionally, when participants were exposed to information featuring fair risk managers, perceived risk decreased, an effect that was mediated by beliefs that EGS was controllable and not dreadful. These results underscore the importance of using practices that will increase nonoutcome fairness in the introduction of new technologies.
dc.publisherHarcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherenhanced geothermal systems
dc.subject.otherFairness
dc.subject.otherinformation seeking
dc.subject.otherrisk perception
dc.subject.otherselective exposure
dc.subject.otheruncertainty
dc.titleThe Role of Fairness in Early Characterization of New Technologies: Effects on Selective Exposure and Risk Perception
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170790/1/risa13633.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170790/2/risa13633_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/risa.13633
dc.identifier.sourceRisk Analysis
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSawicki, V., Wegener, D. T., Clark, J. K., Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., & Bengal, S. T. ( 2011 ). Seeking confirmation in times of doubt: Selective exposure and the motivational strength of weak attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2 ( 5 ), 540 – 546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611400212
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegrist, M., Connor, M., & Keller, C. ( 2012 ). Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Risk Analysis, 32 ( 8 ), 1394 – 1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01739.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegrist, M., & Sütterlin, B. ( 2017 ). Importance of perceived naturalness for acceptance of food additives and cultured meat. Appetite, 113, 320 – 326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.019
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSjöberg, L., & Drottz‐Sjöberg, B.‐M. ( 2001 ). Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository. Journal of Risk Research, 4 ( 1 ), 75 – 101. https://doi.org/10.1080/136698701456040
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P. ( 1987 ). Perception of risk. Science, 236 ( 4799 ), 280 – 285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P. ( 2000 ). The perception of risk. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. ( 2002 ). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397 – 420 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. ( 1979 ). Rating the risks. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 21 ( 3 ), 14 – 39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1979.9933091
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic, P., Malmfors, T., Krewski, D., Mertz, C. K., Neil, N., & Bartlett, S. ( 1995 ). Intuitive toxicology. II. Expert and lay judgments of chemical risks in Canada. Risk Analysis, 15 ( 6 ), 661 – 675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb01338.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Norris, M. E. ( 2008 ). Reflecting on six decades of selective exposure research: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2 ( 1 ), 464 – 493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00060.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalaska, C. A., Fiske, S. T., & Chaiken, S. ( 2008 ). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta‐analysis. Social Justice Research, 21 ( 3 ), 263 – 296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0071-2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrumbo, C. W. ( 1996 ). Examining psychometrics and polarization in a single‐risk case study. Risk Analysis, 16 ( 3 ), 429 – 438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01477.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. ( 2003 ). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis, 23 ( 2 ), 343 – 353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00313
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyler, T. R. ( 1997 ). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1 ( 4 ), 323 – 345. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Geological Survey. ( 2016 ). Lists, maps, and statistics. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/lists-maps-and-statistics
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan den Bos, K. ( 2001a ). Fairness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner, & D. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 63 – 84 ). Greenwich, CT: Infor.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan den Bos, K. ( 2001b ). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 ( 6 ), 931 – 941. (2001‐06600‐007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.931
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. ( 2002 ). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1 – 60 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVisschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. ( 2008 ). Exploring the triangular relationship between trust, affect, and risk perception: A review of the literature. Risk Management, 10 ( 3 ), 156 – 167. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2008.1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVisschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. ( 2012 ). Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants. Energy Policy, 46, 292 – 300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.062
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. ( 2013 ). The risk perception paradox—Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33 ( 6 ), 1049 – 1065. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilloughby, J. F., & Myrick, J. G. ( 2016 ). Does context matter? Examining PRISM as a guiding framework for context‐specific health risk information seeking among young adults. Journal of Health Communication, 21 ( 6 ), 696 – 704. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1153764
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitte, K. ( 1996 ). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In L. K. Guerrero & P. A. Andersen (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 423 – 450 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang, Z. J. ( 2016 ). Altruism during Ebola: Risk perception, issue salience, cultural cognition, and information processing. Risk Analysis, 36 ( 6 ), 1079 – 1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12526
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang, Z. J., Aloe, A. M., & Feeley, T. H. ( 2014 ). Risk information seeking and processing model: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Communication, 64 ( 1 ), 20 – 41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12071
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. ( 2000 ). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 ( 1 ), 1 – 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiorino, D. J. ( 1990 ). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15 ( 2 ), 226 – 243. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500204
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrett, R. K. ( 2009 ). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59 ( 4 ), 676 – 699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenberg, J. ( 1993 ). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54 ( 1 ), 81 – 103. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1004
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBesley, J. C. ( 2010 ). Public engagement and the impact of fairness perceptions on decision favorability and acceptance. Science Communication, 32 ( 2 ), 256 – 280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009358624
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBesley, J. C. ( 2012 ). Does fairness matter in the context of anger about nuclear energy decision making? Risk Analysis, 32 ( 1 ), 25 – 38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01664.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBesley, J. C., Kramer, V. L., Yao, Q., & Toumey, C. ( 2008 ). Interpersonal discussion following citizen engagement about nanotechnology: What, if anything, do they say? Science Communication, 30 ( 2 ), 209 – 235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324670
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBesley, J. C., & McComas, K. A. ( 2005 ). Framing justice: Using the concept of procedural justice to advance political communication research. Communication Theory, 15 ( 4 ), 414 – 436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2005.tb00342.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBesley, J. C., McComas, K. A., & Waks, L. ( 2006 ). Media use and the perceived justice of local science authorities. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83 ( 4 ), 801 – 818. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300405
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonneuil, C., Joly, P.‐B., & Marris, C. ( 2008 ). Disentrenching experiment: The construction of GM—crop field trials as a social problem. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33 ( 2 ), 201 – 229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311263
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBostrom, A. ( 2008 ). Lead is like mercury: Risk comparisons, analogies and mental models. Journal of Risk Research, 11 ( 1–2 ), 99 – 117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870701602956
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrell, T., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. ( 2019 ). sCARy! Risk perceptions in autonomous driving: The influence of experience on perceived benefits and barriers. Risk Analysis, 39 ( 2 ), 342 – 357. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13190
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCobb, M. D., & Macoubrie, J. ( 2004 ). Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6 ( 4 ), 395 – 405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-004-3394-4
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColquitt, J. A. ( 2001 ). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 ( 3 ), 386 – 400. (2001‐06715‐002). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCvetkovich, G., & Nakayachi, K. ( 2007 ). Trust in a high‐concern risk controversy: A comparison of three concepts. Journal of Risk Research, 10 ( 2 ), 223 – 237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870601122519
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. ( 1993 ). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEarle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. ( 1995 ). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEarle, T. C., & Siegrist, M. ( 2008 ). On the relation between trust and fairness in environmental risk management. Risk Analysis, 28 ( 5 ), 1395 – 1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01091.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEarle, T. C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. ( 2007 ). Trust, risk perception, and the TCC Model of cooperation. In M. Siegrist, T. C. Earle, & H. Gutscher (Eds.), Trust in cooperative risk management: Uncertainty and scepticism in the public mind (pp. 1 – 50 ). Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeldman, L., & Hart, P. S. ( 2018 ). Broadening exposure to climate change news? How framing and political orientation interact to influence selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 68 ( 3 ), 503 – 524. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy011
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFernandez, G., Tun, A. M., Okazaki, K., Zaw, S. H., & Kyaw, K. ( 2018 ). Factors influencing fire, earthquake, and cyclone risk perception in Yangon, Myanmar. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 140 – 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.028
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFestinger, L. ( 1957 ). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. ( 1999 ). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80 ( 2 ), S230 – S245. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrigoli, F., Cesca, S., Rinaldi, A. P., Manconi, A., López‐Comino, J. A., Clinton, J. F., … Wiemer, S. ( 2018 ). The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea. Science, 360 ( 6392 ), 1003 – 1006. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2010
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutmann, A. ( 2011 ). The ethics of synthetic biology: Guiding principles for emerging technologies. Hastings Center Report, 41 ( 4 ), 17 – 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00118.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2018 ). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression‐based approach ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo, M.‐C., Shaw, D., Lin, S., & Chiu, Y.‐C. ( 2008 ). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis, 28 ( 3 ), 635 – 643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo, S. S., Detenber, B. H., Rosenthal, S., & Lee, E. W. J. ( 2014 ). Seeking information about climate change: Effects of media use in an extended PRISM. Science Communication, 36 ( 3 ), 270 – 295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013520238
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHulse, L. M., Xie, H., & Galea, E. R. ( 2018 ). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102, 1 – 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHung, H.‐C., & Wang, T.‐W. ( 2011 ). Determinants and mapping of collective perceptions of technological risk: The case of the second nuclear power plant in Taiwan. Risk Analysis, 31 ( 4 ), 668 – 683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01539.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJang, S. M. ( 2014 ). Seeking congruency or incongruency online?: Examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Science Communication, 36 ( 2 ), 143 – 167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013502733
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonas, E., Schulz‐Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. ( 2001 ). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 ( 4 ), 557 – 571. (2001‐00201‐003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, K.‐H., Ree, J.‐H., Kim, Y., Kim, S., Kang, S. Y., & Seo, W. ( 2018 ). Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event. Science, 360 ( 6392 ), 1007 – 1009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat6081
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahlor, L. ( 2010 ). PRISM: A planned risk information seeking model. Health Communication, 25 ( 4 ), 345 – 356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410231003775172
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnoblauch, T. A. K., Trutnevyte, E., & Stauffacher, M. ( 2019 ). Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss‐German cross‐national study. Energy Policy, 128, 807 – 816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.019
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnobloch‐Westerwick, S. ( 2014 ). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure theory and research. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771359
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnobloch‐Westerwick, S., Johnson, B. K., Silver, N. A., & Westerwick, A. ( 2015 ). Science exemplars in the eye of the beholder: How exposure to online science information affects attitudes. Science Communication, 37 ( 5 ), 575 – 601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015596367
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnobloch‐Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. ( 2009 ). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude‐consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36 ( 3 ), 426 – 448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209333030
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunreuther, H., Easterling, D., Desvousges, W., & Slovic, P. ( 1990 ). Public attitudes toward siting a high‐level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis, 10 ( 4 ), 469 – 484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00533.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunreuther, H., Fitzgerald, K., & Aarts, T. D. ( 1993 ). Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo. Risk Analysis, 13 ( 3 ), 301 – 318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01082.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaestadius, L. I., & Caldwell, M. A. ( 2015 ). Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutrition, 18 ( 13 ), 2457 – 2467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015000622
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, D. H., Mehta, M. D., & James, P. D. ( 2003 ). Differences in the perception of blood transfusion risk between laypeople and physicians. Transfusion, 43 ( 6 ), 772 – 778. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00401.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. ( 2001 ). Primacy effects in justice judgments: Testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85 ( 2 ), 189 – 210. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2937
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & Park, M. V. de V. ( 1993 ). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 ( 2 ), 224 – 251. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393412
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLind, E. A., & van den Bos, K. ( 2002 ). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24, 181 – 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24006-X
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClure, J., Walkey, F., & Allen, M. ( 1999 ). When earthquake damage is seen as preventable: Attributions, locus of control and attitudes to risk. Applied Psychology, 48 ( 2 ), 239 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00060.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcComas, K. A., & Besley, J. C. ( 2011 ). Fairness and nanotechnology concern. Risk Analysis, 31 ( 11 ), 1749 – 1761. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01676.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcComas, K. A., Besley, J. C., & Steinhardt, J. ( 2014 ). Factors influencing U.S. consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease. Appetite, 78, 8 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.006
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcComas, K. A., Besley, J. C., & Yang, Z. ( 2008 ). Risky business: Perceived behavior of local scientists and community support for their research. Risk Analysis, 28 ( 6 ), 1539 – 1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01129.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcComas, K. A., Lu, H., Keranen, K. M., Furtney, M. A., & Song, H. ( 2016 ). Public perceptions and acceptance of induced earthquakes related to energy development. Energy Policy, 99, 27 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.026
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcComas, K. A., Trumbo, C. W., & Besley, J. C. ( 2007 ). Public meetings about suspected cancer clusters: The impact of voice, interactional justice, and risk perception on attendees’ attitudes in six communities. Journal of Health Communication, 12 ( 6 ), 527 – 549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701508245
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcComas, K. A., Tuite, L. S., Waks, L., & Sherman, L. A. ( 2007 ). Predicting satisfaction and outcome acceptance with advisory committee meetings: The role of procedural justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37 ( 5 ), 905 – 927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00192.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeppelink, C. S., Smit, E. G., Fransen, M. L., & Diviani, N. ( 2019 ). “I was right about vaccination”: Confirmation Bias and health literacy in online health information seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 24 ( 2 ), 129 – 140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1583701
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMercer‐Mapstone, L., Rifkin, W., Louis, W. R., & Moffat, K. ( 2018 ). Company‐community dialogue builds relationships, fairness, and trust leading to social acceptance of Australian mining developments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 671 – 677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.291
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohorčich, J., & Reese, J. ( 2019 ). Cell‐cultured meat: Lessons from GMO adoption and resistance. Appetite, 143, 104408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104408
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullet, E., Duquesnoy, C., Raiff, P., Fahrasmane, R., & Namur, E. ( 1993 ). The evaluative factor of risk perception. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23 ( 19 ), 1594 – 1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01050.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council. ( 1996 ). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council. ( 2008 ). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeedham, M. D., & Vaske, J. J. ( 2008 ). Hunter perceptions of similarity and trust in wildlife agencies and personal risk associated with chronic wasting disease. Society & Natural Resources, 21 ( 3 ), 197 – 214. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701816336
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzdemir, O., & Yilmaz, C. ( 2011 ). Factors affecting risk mitigation revisited: The case of earthquake in Turkey. Journal of Risk Research, 14 ( 1 ), 17 – 46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669871003782751
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaek, H.‐J., & Hove, T. ( 2017 ). Risk perceptions and risk characteristics. In H.‐J. Paek & T. Hove (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.283
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaolacci, G., & Chandler, J. ( 2014 ). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23 ( 3 ), 184 – 188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531598
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. ( 2003 ). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23 ( 5 ), 961 – 972. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00373
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoortvliet, P. M., & Lokhorst, A. M. ( 2016 ). The key role of experiential uncertainty when dealing with risks: Its relationships with demand for regulation and institutional trust. Risk Analysis, 36 ( 8 ), 1615 – 1629. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12543
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosen, L., & Kostjukovsky, I. ( 2015 ). Parental risk perceptions of child exposure to tobacco smoke. BMC Public Health, 15 ( 1 ), 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1434-x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, V. L., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. ( 2014 ). Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: Testing a social‐psychological model. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 61 – 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.039
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth, E., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Lave, L., & Bostrom, A. ( 1990 ). What do we know about making risk comparisons? Risk Analysis, 10 ( 3 ), 375 – 387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00520.x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSawicki, V., Wegener, D. T., Clark, J. K., Fabrigar, L. R., Smith, S. M., & Durso, G. R. O. ( 2013 ). Feeling conflicted and seeking information: When ambivalence enhances and diminishes selective exposure to attitude‐consistent information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 ( 6 ), 735 – 747. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481388
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchütz, H., & Wiedemann, P. M. ( 2008 ). Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 17 ( 3 ), 369 – 379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071282
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSee, K. E. ( 2009 ). Reactions to decisions with uncertain consequences: Reliance on perceived fairness versus predicted outcomes depends on knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 ( 1 ), 104 – 118. (2008‐18683‐002). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013266
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.