View Item 

Show simple item record

Interprofessional Practitioners’ Opinions on Features and Services for an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Brain‐Computer Interface Device
dc.contributor.authorHill, Katya
dc.contributor.authorHuggins, Jane
dc.contributor.authorWoodworth, Chelsea
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T00:45:26Z
dc.date.available2022-11-01 20:45:25en
dc.date.available2021-11-02T00:45:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.identifier.citationHill, Katya; Huggins, Jane; Woodworth, Chelsea (2021). "Interprofessional Practitioners’ Opinions on Features and Services for an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Brain‐Computer Interface Device." PM&R 13(10): 1111-1121.
dc.identifier.issn1934-1482
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170818
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.titleInterprofessional Practitioners’ Opinions on Features and Services for an Augmentative and Alternative Communication Brain‐Computer Interface Device
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelKinesiology and Sports
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170818/1/pmrj12525_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170818/2/pmrj12525.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pmrj.12525
dc.identifier.sourcePM&R
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeale R, Forbes D. Understanding triangulation in research. Evid Based Nurs. 2013; 16: 98. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZickler, C., Al‐Khodairy, A., Kubler, A., Hoogerwerf, E., Kleih, S., Rohm, M., Mattia, D., … Kahane, P. ( 2010 ) “BCI‐Applications: Needs and requirements of disabled end‐users and professional users. 4 th Int’l BCI Meeting, D‐4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaser BG, Strauss AL, Strutzel E. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res. 1968; 17 ( 4 ): 364.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. ( 2017 ). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. NY: Routledge. ISBN 13:978–0–202‐30260‐7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999; 34 ( 5 Pt 2 ): 1189 ‐ 1208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasch CE. Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q. 1987; 14 ( 4 ): 411 ‐ 448.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitzinger J. Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences, and understandings. Holloway, Qualitative Research in Health Care. New York, NY: Open University Press; 2005: 56 ‐ 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolloway I. Qualitative Research in Health Care. New York, NY: Open University Press; 2005.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill K, Kovacs T, Shin S. Reliability of brain‐computer interface language sample transcription procedures. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51 ( 4 ): 579 ‐ 590. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.05.0102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKovacs T, Hill K. A tutorial on reliability testing in AAC language sample transcription and analysis. Augment Altern Commun. 2015; 31 ( 2 ): 159 ‐ 169. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1036118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3 ( 2 ): 77 ‐ 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrumberg JS, Nieto‐Castanon A, Kennedy PR, Guenther FH. Brain‐computer interfaces for speech communication. Speech Commun. 2010; 52 ( 4 ): 367 ‐ 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.01.001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMillan JD, Rupp R, Muller‐Putz GR, et al. Combining brain‐computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state‐of‐the‐art and challenges. Front Neurosci. 2010; 4: 161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson DE, Gruis KL, Huggins JE. A plug‐and‐play brain‐computer interface to operate commercial assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013; 9 ( 2 ): 144 ‐ 150. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.785036.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuggins JE, Alcaide‐Aguirre RE, Hill K. Effects of text generation on P300 brain‐computer interface performance. Brain‐Comput Interfaces. 2016; 3 ( 2 ): 112 ‐ 120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1203629.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan DB, Frye GE, Townsend G, et al. Predictive spelling with a P300‐based brain‐computer interface: increasing the rate of communication. Int J Human‐Comput Interact. 2010; 27 ( 1 ): 69 ‐ 84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.535754.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill K. Advances in augmentative and alternative communication as quality‐of‐life technology. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010; 21: 43 ‐ 58.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). The Promise of Assistive Technology to Enhance Activity and Work Participation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.17226/24740.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen SK, O’Leary M. Eye gazing 101: What Speech‐Language Pathologist Should Know about Selecting Eye‐Gaze Augmentative and Alternative Communication Techniques. Vol 3 ( 1 ), Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups; 2018: 1 ‐ 9. https://perspectives.pubs.asha.org/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill K, Kovacs T, Shin S. Critical issues using brain‐computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 3 ( 96 ): S8 ‐ S15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.034.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSellers EW, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. A brain‐computer interface for long‐term independent home use. Amyotrophic Lateral Scler. 2010; 11: 449 ‐ 455.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolpaw JR, Bedlack RS, Reda DJ, et al. Independent home use of a brain‐computer interface by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2018; 91: e258 ‐ e267.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBotrel L, Holz EM, Kübler A. Brain painting V2: evaluation of P300‐based brain‐computer interface for creative expression by an end‐user following the user‐centered design. Brain‐Comput Interfaces. 2015; 2: 135 ‐ 149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolz EM, Botrel L, Kaufmann T, Kubler A. Long‐term independent brain‐computer interface home use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked‐in state: a case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: S16 ‐ S26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGosmanova KA, Carmack CS, Goldberg D, et al. EEG‐Based Brain‐Computer Interface Access to Tobii Dynavox Communicator 5. Arlington, VA: RESNA; 2017. https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/conference/2017/cac/Gosmanova.html.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event‐related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuropsychol. 1988; 70: 510 ‐ 523.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZickler C, Halder S, Kleih SC, Herbert C, Kubler A. Brain painting: usability testing according to the user‐centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis. Artif Intell Med. 2013; 59 ( 2 ): 99 ‐ 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2013.08.003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberati G, Pizzimenti A, Simione L, et al. Developing brain‐computer interfaces from a user‐centered perspective: assessing the needs of persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, caregivers, and professionals. Appl Ergon. 2015; 50: 139 ‐ 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuggins JE, Moinuddin AA, Chiodo AE, Wren PA. What would brain‐computer interface users want: opinions and priorities of potential users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96: S38‐45.e1‐5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuggins JE, Wren PA, Gruis KL. What would brain‐computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011; 12: 318 ‐ 324.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollinger JL, Boninger ML, Bruns TM, Curley K, Wang W, Weber DJ. Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain‐computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50: 145 ‐ 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZickler C, Di Donna V, Kaiser V, et al. BCI applications for people with disabilities: defining user needs and user requirements. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen AL, eds. Assistive Technology from Adapted Equipment to Inclusive Environments. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2009: 185 ‐ 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlain‐Moraes S, Schaff R, Gruis KL, Huggins JE, Wren PA. Barriers to and mediators of brain‐computer interface user acceptance: focus group findings. Ergonomics. 2012; 55: 516 ‐ 525.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAloise F, Aricò P, Schettini F, Salinari S, Mattia D, Cincotti F. Asynchronous gaze independent event‐related potential‐based brain‐computer interface. Artif Intell Med. 2013; 59: 61 ‐ 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAydin EA, Bay OF, Guler I. P300‐based asynchronous brain computer Interface for environmental control system. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018; 22: 653 ‐ 663.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlcaide‐Aguirre RE, Warschausky SA, Brown D, Aref A, Huggins JE. Asynchronous brain‐computer interface for cognitive assessment in people with cerebral palsy. J Neural Eng. 2017; 14: 066001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization (WHO). ( 2010 ). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70185/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf;jsessionid=A9C3C1522745A4EC5705CCB8D0C68CE1?sequence=1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association (ASHA). ( 2019 ). Interprofessional Education/Interprofessional Practice https://www.asha.org/Practice/Interprofessional-Education-Practice/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Speech‐Language‐Hearing Association (ASHA). (n.d.). Medicare speech‐generating devices information. https://www.asha.org/SLP/healthcare/Medicare-Speech-Generating-Devices-Information/
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
pmrj12525_am.pdf
Size:
606.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
pmrj12525.pdf
Size:
910.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.