View Item 

Show simple item record

What is empathy? Oncology patient perspectives on empathic clinician behaviors
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Justin J.
dc.contributor.authorDubey, Manisha
dc.contributor.authorHall, Judith A.
dc.contributor.authorCatzen, Hannah Z.
dc.contributor.authorBlanch‐Hartigan, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-02T00:46:14Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01 20:46:13en
dc.date.available2021-11-02T00:46:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-15
dc.identifier.citationSanders, Justin J.; Dubey, Manisha; Hall, Judith A.; Catzen, Hannah Z.; Blanch‐Hartigan, Danielle ; Schwartz, Rachel (2021). "What is empathy? Oncology patient perspectives on empathic clinician behaviors." Cancer (22): 4258-4265.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170843
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherNational Cancer Institute
dc.subject.othercommunication
dc.subject.otherempathy
dc.subject.otheroncology
dc.subject.otherqualitative
dc.subject.otherquality improvement
dc.titleWhat is empathy? Oncology patient perspectives on empathic clinician behaviors
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170843/1/cncr33834_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170843/2/cncr33834.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.33834
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsieh H- F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. Published online July 1, 2016. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBensing JM, Deveugele M, Moretti F, et al. How to make the medical consultation more successful from a patient’s perspective? Tips for doctors and patients from lay people in the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 84: 287 - 293. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujimori M, Uchitomi Y. Preferences of cancer patients regarding communication of bad news: a systematic literature review. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009; 39: 201 - 216. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn159
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuirk M, Mazor K, Haley H- L, et al. How patients perceive a doctor’s caring attitude. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 72: 359 - 366. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.022
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrand SR, Fasciano K, Mack JW. Communication preferences of pediatric cancer patients: talking about prognosis and their future life. Support Care Cancer. 2017; 25: 769 - 774. doi: 10.1007/s00520- 016- 3458- x
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReese JB, Beach MC, Smith KC, et al. Effective patient- provider communication about sexual concerns in breast cancer: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2017; 25: 3199 - 3207. doi: 10.1007/s00520- 017- 3729- 1
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSulzer SH, Feinstein NW, Wendland CL. Assessing empathy development in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2016; 50: 300 - 310. doi: 10.1111/medu.12806
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHojat M, DeSantis J, Gonnella JS. Patient perceptions of clinician’s empathy: measurement and psychometrics. J Patient Exp. 2017; 4: 78 - 83. doi: 10.1177/2374373517699273
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al. The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001; 61: 349 - 365. doi: 10.1177/00131640121971158
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall JA, Schwartz R, Duong F, et al. What is clinical empathy? Perspectives of community members, university students, cancer patients, and physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2021; 104: 1237 - 1245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.001
dc.identifier.citedreferenceECOG performance status. ECOG- ACRIN. Accessed July 29, 2019. https://ecog- acrin.org/resources/ecog- performance- status
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)- a metadata- driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377 - 381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorse JM, Field PA. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. Sage Publications; 1995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSternke EA, Abrahamson K, Bair MJ. Comorbid chronic pain and depression: patient perspectives on empathy. Pain Manag Nurs. 2016; 17: 363 - 371. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.07.003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoter DL, Hall JA. Studies of doctor- patient interaction. Annu Rev Public Health. 1989; 10: 163 - 180. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.10.050189.001115
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoto- Rubio A, Sinclair S. In defense of sympathy, in consideration of empathy, and in praise of compassion: a history of the present. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018; 55: 1428 - 1434. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.12.478
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinclair S, Beamer K, Hack TF, et al. Sympathy, empathy, and compassion: a grounded theory study of palliative care patients’ understandings, experiences, and preferences. Palliat Med. 2017; 31: 437 - 447. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663499
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBack AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, et al. Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167: 453 - 460. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.453
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnold RM, Back AL, Baile WF, Edwards KA, Tulsky JA. The Oncotalk/Vitaltalk model. In: Kissane DW, Bultz BD, Butow PN, Bylund CL, Noble S, Wilkinson S, eds. Oxford Textbook of Communication in Oncology and Palliative Care. 2 nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2017:chap 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerlacher K, Arnold RM, Reitschuler- Cross E, Teuteberg J, Teuteberg W. The impact of communication skills training on cardiology fellows’ and attending physicians’ perceived comfort with difficult conversations. J Palliat Med. 2017; 20: 767 - 769. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0509
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevinson W, Lesser CS, Epstein RM. Developing physician communication skills for patient- centered care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29: 1310 - 1318. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0450
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernacki RE, Block SD; American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force. Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1994 - 2003. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson RL, Roter D, Powe NR, Cooper LA. Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient- physician communication during medical visits. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 2084 - 2090. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.12.2084
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong MS, Gudzune KA, Bleich SN. Provider communication quality: influence of patients’ weight and race. Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98: 492 - 498. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.007
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShen MJ, Peterson EB, Costas- Muñiz R, et al. The effects of race and racial concordance on patient- physician communication: a systematic review of the literature. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018; 5: 117 - 140. doi: 10.1007/s40615- 017- 0350- 4
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer NRA, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in patient- provider communication, quality- of- care ratings, and patient activation among long- term cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 4087 - 4094. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.5060
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon HS, Street RL Jr, Sharf BF, Kelly PA, Souchek J. Racial differences in trust and lung cancer patients’ perceptions of physician communication. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 904 - 909. doi: 10.1200/jco.2005.03.1955
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBatt- Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013; 88: 1171 - 1177. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWündrich M, Schwartz C, Feige B, Lemper D, Nissen C, Voderholzer U. Empathy training in medical students- a randomized controlled trial. Med Teach. 2017; 39: 1096 - 1098. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1355451
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLelorain S, Brédart A, Dolbeault S, Sultan S. A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care. Psychooncology. 2012; 21: 1255 - 1264. doi: 10.1002/pon.2115
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, et al. Determinants and patient- reported long- term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modelling approach. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 69: 63 - 75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy- based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004; 21: 699 - 705. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh621
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRakel D, Barrett B, Zhang Z, et al. Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: effects on the common cold. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 85: 390 - 397. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.009
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEtingen B, Miskevics S, LaVela SL. Assessing the associations of patient- reported perceptions of patient- centered care as supplemental measures of health care quality in VA. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31 ( suppl 1 ): 10 - 20. doi: 10.1007/s11606- 015- 3557- 2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanale SD, Louis DZ, Maio V, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012; 87: 1243 - 1249. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoss J, Roberts MB, Shea L, et al. Healthcare provider compassion is associated with lower PTSD symptoms among patients with life- threatening medical emergencies: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45: 815 - 822. doi: 10.1007/s00134- 019- 05601- 5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, et al. Measuring patient- centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72: 1085 - 1095. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.020
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein RM, Street RL Jr. Patient- Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. National Cancer Institute; 2007.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalhotra C, Kanesvaran R, Krishna L, et al. Oncologists’ responses to patient and caregiver negative emotions and patient perception of quality of communication: results from a multi- ethnic Asian setting. Support Care Cancer. 2018; 26: 957 - 965. doi: 10.1007/s00520- 017- 3916- 0
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohani C, Sedaghati Kesbakhi M, Mohtashami J. Clinical empathy with cancer patients: a content analysis of oncology nurses’ perception. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018; 12: 1089 - 1098. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S156441
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanerjee SC, Manna R, Coyle N, et al. Oncology nurses’ communication challenges with patients and families: a qualitative study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016; 16: 193 - 201. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.07.007
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, Ehrnrooth E, Rossen PB, von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer- related self- efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88: 658 - 665. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600798
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDi Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001; 357: 757 - 762. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(00)04169- 6
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffstädt H, Stouthard J, Meijers MC, et al. Patients’ and clinicians’ perceptions of clinician- expressed empathy in advanced cancer consultations and associations with patient outcomes. Palliat Med Rep. 2020; 1: 76 - 83. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0052
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall JA, Schwartz R. Empathy present and future. J Soc Psychol. 2019; 159: 225 - 243. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr33834_am.pdf
Size:
243.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr33834.pdf
Size:
157.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.