Show simple item record

Phenology and flowering overlap drive specialisation in plant–pollinator networks

dc.contributor.authorGlaum, Paul
dc.contributor.authorWood, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Jonathan R.
dc.contributor.authorValdovinos, Fernanda S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-02T02:27:55Z
dc.date.available2023-01-01 21:27:54en
dc.date.available2021-12-02T02:27:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.citationGlaum, Paul; Wood, Thomas J.; Morris, Jonathan R.; Valdovinos, Fernanda S. (2021). "Phenology and flowering overlap drive specialisation in plant–pollinator networks." Ecology Letters (12): 2648-2659.
dc.identifier.issn1461-023X
dc.identifier.issn1461-0248
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170937
dc.description.abstractVariation in dietary specialisation stems from fundamental interactions between species and their environment. Consequently, understanding the drivers of this variation is key to understanding ecological and evolutionary processes. Dietary specialisation in wild bees has received attention due to their close mutualistic dependence on plants, and because both groups are threatened by biodiversity loss. Many principles governing pollinator specialisation have been identified, but they remain largely unvalidated. Organismal phenology has the potential to structure realised specialisation by determining concurrent resource availability and pollinator foraging activity. We evaluate this principle using mechanistic models of adaptive foraging in pollinators within plant–pollinator networks. While temporal resource overlap has little impact on specialisation in pollinators with extended flight periods, reduced overlap increases specialisation as pollinator flight periods decrease. These results are corroborated empirically using pollen load data taken from bees with shorter and longer flight periods across environments with high and low temporal resource overlap.Understanding the drivers of organisms’ dietary specialisation is a fundamental question in ecology. Here we investigate the temporal aspects influencing specialisation in wild bees using complimentary theoretical and empirical approaches. Results indicate that the degree of temporal overlap among different resource options can drive dietary specialisation in bees via the length of their foraging periods.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherPrinceton University Press
dc.subject.otherphenology
dc.subject.otherpollen
dc.subject.otherseasonality
dc.subject.othertemporal resource density
dc.subject.otherdiet specialisation
dc.subject.otheradaptive foraging
dc.titlePhenology and flowering overlap drive specialisation in plant–pollinator networks
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170937/1/ele13884_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170937/2/ele13884.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ele.13884
dc.identifier.sourceEcology Letters
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson, B.W. & Wilson, D.S. ( 1998 ) Optimal foraging, specialization, and a solution to Liem’s paradox. The American Naturalist, 151, 223 – 235.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElse, G.R. & Edwards, M. ( 2018 ) Handbook of the bees of the British Isles, 180, London, UK: Ray Society Monographs, p. 775.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForister, M.L., Novotny, V., Panorska, A.K., Baje, L., Basset, Y., Butterill, P.T. et al. ( 2015 ) The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 ( 2 ), 442 – 447.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaribaldi, L.A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Winfree, R., Aizen, M.A., Bommarco, R., Cunningham, S.A. et al. ( 2013 ) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science, 339 ( 6127 ), 1608 – 1611.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunter, M. ( 2016 ) The phytochemical landscape: linking trophic interactions and nutrient dynamics. Princeton University Press, p. 376.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJordano, P. ( 2016 ) Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Functional Ecology, 30, 1883 – 1893.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJulliard, R., Clavel, J., Devictor, V., Jiguet, F. & Couvet, D. ( 2006 ) Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecology Letters, 9, 1237 – 1244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKartzinel, T.R., Chen, P.A., Coverdale, T.C., Erickson, D.L., Kress, W.J., Kuzmina, M.L. et al. ( 2015 ) DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 ( 26 ), 8019 – 8024.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing, C., Ballantyne, G. & Willmer, P.G. ( 2013 ) Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination:measuring single‐visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 811 – 818.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLopezaraiza‐Mikel, M.E., Hayes, R.B., Whalley, M.R. & Memmott, J. ( 2007 ) The impact of an alien plant on a native plant–pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecology letters, 10 ( 7 ), 539 – 550.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacArthur, R.H. & Pianka, E.R. ( 1966 ) On optimal use of a patchy environment. The American Naturalist, 100 ( 916 ), 603 – 609.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoldenke, A.R. ( 1979 ) The role of host‐plant selection in bee speciation processes. Phytologia, 43, 433 – 460.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResende, E.L., Lavabre, J.E., Guimarães, P.R., Jordano, P. & Bascompte, J. ( 2007 ) Non‐random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature, 448, 925 – 928.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStace, C. ( 2010 ) New flora of the British Isles, 3rd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 1232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSvanbäck, R. & Bolnik, D.I. ( 2007 ) Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274 ( 1161 ), 839 – 844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, J. ( 1998 ) (1998) Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13 ( 8 ), 329 – 332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValdovinos, F.S., Brosi, B.J., Briggs, H.M., Moisset de Espanés, P., Ramos‐Jiliberto, R. & Martinez, N.D. ( 2016 ) Niche partitioning due to adaptive foraging reverses effects of nestedness and connectance on pollination network stability. Ecology Letters, 19, 1277 – 1286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValdovinos, F.S., Moisset de Espanés, P., Flores, J.D. & Ramos‐Jiliberto, R. ( 2013 ) Adaptive foraging allows the maintenance of biodiversity of pollination networks. Oikos, 122 ( 6 ), 907 – 917.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, E.G. & Reznicek, A.A. ( 2012 ) Field manual of Michigan flora. Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, X.‐Y., Tang, J., Wu, T., Wu, D. & Huang, S.‐Q. ( 2019 ) Bumblebee rejection of toxic pollen facilitates pollen transfer. Current Biology, 29, 1401 – 1406.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaser, N.M., Chittka, L., Price, M.V., Williams, N.M. & Ollerton, J. ( 1996 ) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology, 77 ( 4 ), 1043 – 1060.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWesterkamp, C. ( 1996 ) Pollen in bee–flower relations. Some considerations on melittophily. Botanica Acta, 109, 325 – 332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestrich, P.H. ( 1989 ) Die Wildbienen Baden‐Wuirttembergs. Volumes I and II. Stuttgart, Germany: Ulmer Verlag.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, N.M., Minckley, R.L. & Silveira, F.A. ( 2001 ) Variation in native bee communities and its implications for detecting community changes. Conservation Ecology, 5, 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWood, T.J., Gibbs, J., Graham, K.K. & Isaacs, R. ( 2019 ) Narrow pollen diets are associated with declining Midwestern bumble bee species. Ecology, 100 ( 6 ), e02697.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWood, T.J. & Roberts, S.P.M. ( 2018 ) Constrained patterns of pollen use in Nearctic Andrena (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) compared with their Palaearctic counterparts. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 124, 732 – 746.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEncinas‐Viso, F., Revilla, T.A. & Etienne, R.S. ( 2012 ) Phenology drives mutualistic network structure and diversity. Ecology letters, 15 ( 3 ), 198 – 208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFordyce, J.A., Nice, C.C., Hamm, C.A. & Forister, M.L. ( 2016 ) Quantifying diet breadth through ordination of host association. Ecology, 97, 842 – 849.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlarcón, R. ( 2010 ) Congruence between visitation and pollen‐transport networks in a California plant‐pollinator community. Oikos, 119, 35 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli, J.G. & Agrawal, A.A. ( 2012 ) Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends in Plant Science, 17 ( 5 ), 293 – 302.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAscher, J.S. & Pickering, J. ( 2020 ) Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeck, H.E., Zimmermann, N.E., McVicar, T.R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A. & Wood, E.F. ( 2018 ) Present and future Köppen‐Geiger climate classification maps at 1‐km resolution. Scientific Data, 5, 180214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiesmeijer, J.C., Roberts, S.P., Reemer, M., Ohlemüller, R., Edwards, M., Peeters, T. et al. ( 2006 ) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect‐pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science, 313 ( 5785 ), 351 – 354.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBommarco, R., Biesmeijer, J.C., Meyer, B., Potts, S.G., Pöyry, J., Roberts, S.P. et al. ( 2010 ) Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277 ( 1690 ), 2075 – 2082.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyle, W.A., Conway, C.J. & Bronstein, J.L. ( 2011 ) Why do some, but not all, tropical birds migrate? A comparative study of diet breadth and fruit preference. Evolutionary Ecology, 25 ( 1 ), 219 – 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrady, S.G., Sipes, S., Pearson, A. & Danforth, B.N. ( 2006 ) Recent and simultaneous origins of eusociality in halictid bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 1643 – 1649.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrochu, K.K., van Dyke, M.T., Milano, N.J., Petersen, J.D., McArt, S.H., Nault, B.A. et al. ( 2020 ) Pollen defenses negatively impact foraging and fitness in a generalist bee ( Bombus impatiens: Apidae). Scientific Reports, 10, 3112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronstein, J.L. ( 1994 ) Our current understanding of mutualism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 69 ( 1 ), 31 – 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkle, L.A. & Alarcón, R. ( 2011 ) The future of plant‐pollinator diversity: understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. American Journal of Botany, 98, 528 – 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkle, L.A., Marlin, J.C. & Knight, T.M. ( 2013 ) Plant‐pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co‐occurrence, and function. Science, 339 ( 6127 ), 1611 – 1615.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaraDonna, P.J., Petry, W.K., Brennan, R.M., Cunningham, J.L., Bronstein, J.L., Waser, N.M. et al. ( 2017 ) Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant‐pollinator networks. Ecology Letters, 20, 385 – 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanforth, B.N., Minckley, R.L. & Neff, J.L. ( 2019 ) The solitary bees: biology, evolution, conservation. Princeton University Press, p. 418.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDesharnais, B., Camirand‐Lemyre, F., Mireault, P. & Skinner, C.D. ( 2015 ) Determination of confidence intervals in non‐normal data: application of the bootstrap to cocaine concentration in femoral blood. Journal of analytical toxicology, 39 ( 2 ), 113 – 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedeVries, M.S. ( 2017 ) The role of feeding morphology and competition in governing the diet breadth of sympatric stomatopod crustaceans. Biology Letters, 13 ( 4 ), 20170055.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorado, J., Vázquez, D.P., Stevani, E.L. & Chacoff, N.P. ( 2011 ) Rareness and specialization in plant‐pollinator networks. Ecology, 92, 19 – 25.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.