Show simple item record

Ablation versus medication as initial therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: An updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

dc.contributor.authorKewcharoen, Jakrin
dc.contributor.authorPrasitlumkum, Narut
dc.contributor.authorChokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai
dc.contributor.authorYi, Ruiyang
dc.contributor.authorJongnarangsin, Krit
dc.contributor.authorBunch, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.authorRanjan, Ravi
dc.contributor.authorNavaravong, Leenhapong
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T15:48:09Z
dc.date.available2023-01-06 10:48:08en
dc.date.available2022-01-06T15:48:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.identifier.citationKewcharoen, Jakrin; Prasitlumkum, Narut; Chokesuwattanaskul, Ronpichai; Yi, Ruiyang; Jongnarangsin, Krit; Bunch, Thomas J.; Ranjan, Ravi; Navaravong, Leenhapong (2021). "Ablation versus medication as initial therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: An updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials." Journal of Arrhythmia (6): 1448-1458.
dc.identifier.issn1880-4276
dc.identifier.issn1883-2148
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171132
dc.description.abstractBackgroundRecent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest that ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) as an initial therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) to prevent arrhythmia recurrences. We performed an updated meta‐analysis of RCTs, to include recent data from cryoballoon‐based ablation and to compare arrhythmia‐free survival and adverse events between ablation and AADs.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2020. We included RCT comparing patients with pAF undergoing ablation or receiving AADs as an initial therapy. We combined data using the random‐effects model to calculate hazards ratio (HR) for arrhythmia‐free survival and odds ratio (OR) for adverse events.ResultsFive studies from 2005 to 2020 involving 985 patients were included (495 patients and 490 patients underwent ablation and medication as initial therapy, respectively). Patients who underwent ablation had higher freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) during the 12‐24 months follow‐up period (pooled HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.40‐0.59, P < .001). In a subgroup analysis of ablation method used, both cryoablation group (pooled HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.38‐0.64, P < .001) and radiofrequency ablation group (pooled HR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.35‐0.64, P < .001) showed reduction in AT recurrence compared with AAD group. There were no differences in adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, pericardial effusion or tamponade, pulmonary vein stenosis, acute coronary syndrome, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and bradycardia requiring a pacemaker.ConclusionCatheter ablation (both cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation) is superior to AAD as an initial therapy for pAF in efficacy for reducing AT recurrences without a compromise in adverse events.We performed meta‐analysis of the most recent randomized control trials evaluating atrial fibrillation ablation as the first line therapy
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheratrial fibrillation ablation
dc.subject.otherfirst‐line therapy
dc.subject.otherparoxysmal atrial fibrillation
dc.titleAblation versus medication as initial therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: An updated meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCardiovascular Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171132/1/joa312641_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171132/2/joa312641.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/joa3.12641
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Arrhythmia
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHakalahti A, Biancari F, Nielsen JC, Raatikainen MJ. Radiofrequency ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Europace. 2015; 17 ( 3 ): 370 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrade J, Khairy P, Dobrev D, Nattel S. The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms. Circ Res. 2014; 114 ( 9 ): 1453 – 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimantirakis EN, Papakonstantinou PE, Kanoupakis E, Chlouverakis GI, Tzeis S, Vardas PE, et al. Recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation after the first clinical episode: a prospective evaluation using continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring. Clin Cardiol. 2018; 41 ( 5 ): 594 – 600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDorian P, Paquette M, Newman D, Green M, Connolly SJ, Talajic M, et al. Quality of life improves with treatment in the Canadian trial of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2002; 143 ( 6 ): 984 – 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, Piccini JP, Baloch KN, Monahan KH, et al. Effect of catheter ablation vs medical therapy on quality of life among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 321 ( 13 ): 1275 – 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanuary CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014; 130 ( 23 ): 2071 – 104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhia KK, Chugh A, Good E, Pelosi F, Jongnarangsin K, Bogun F, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of atrioesophageal fistula after left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009; 24 ( 1 ): 33 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarg L, Garg J, Gupta N, Shah N, Krishnamoorthy P, Palaniswamy C, et al. Gastrointestinal complications associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 224: 424 – 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale A, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010; 303 ( 4 ): 333 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePacker DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, Irwin JM, Champagne J, Guerra PG, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61 ( 16 ): 1713 – 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorillo CA, Verma A, Connolly SJ, Kuck KH, Nair GM, Champagne J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first‐line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT‐2): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014; 311 ( 7 ): 692 – 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosedis Nielsen J, Johannessen A, Raatikainen P, Hindricks G, Walfridsson H, Kongstad O, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367 ( 17 ): 1587 – 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWazni OM, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Verma A, Bhargava M, Saliba W, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first‐line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005; 293 ( 21 ): 2634 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, Bennett M, Essebag V, Champagne J, et al. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029980
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, Hoyt R, Tyler J, Durrani S, et al. Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029554
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time‐to‐event data into meta‐analysis. Trials. 2007; 8: 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7 ( 3 ): 177 – 88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta‐analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54 ( 10 ): 1046 – 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimmonds M. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots. Syst Rev. 2015; 4: 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDebray TPA, Moons KGM, Riley RD. Detecting small‐study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta‐analysis of survival data: a comparison of new and existing tests. Res Synth Methods. 2018; 9 ( 1 ): 41 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuck K‐H, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KRJ, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374 ( 23 ): 2235 – 45.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.