View Item 

Show simple item record

Measuring depth of invasion of submucosa- - - invasive adenocarcinoma in oesophageal endoscopic specimens: how good are we?-

dc.contributor.authorKaramchandani, Dipti M
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Raul S
dc.contributor.authorWesterhoff, Maria
dc.contributor.authorWestbrook, Lindsey M
dc.contributor.authorPanarelli, Nicole C
dc.contributor.authorAl-Nuaimi, Mayyadah
dc.contributor.authorKing, Tonya
dc.contributor.authorArnold, Christina A
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T15:50:32Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06 10:50:29en
dc.date.available2022-01-06T15:50:32Z
dc.date.issued2022-01
dc.identifier.citationKaramchandani, Dipti M; Gonzalez, Raul S; Westerhoff, Maria; Westbrook, Lindsey M; Panarelli, Nicole C; Al-Nuaimi, Mayyadah ; King, Tonya; Arnold, Christina A (2022). "Measuring depth of invasion of submucosa- - - invasive adenocarcinoma in oesophageal endoscopic specimens: how good are we?- ." Histopathology (2): 420-429.
dc.identifier.issn0309-0167
dc.identifier.issn1365-2559
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171205
dc.publisherPrentice Hall
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheroesophagus
dc.subject.otherdepth
dc.subject.otherinvasion
dc.subject.otheradenocarcinoma
dc.titleMeasuring depth of invasion of submucosa- - - invasive adenocarcinoma in oesophageal endoscopic specimens: how good are we?-
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171205/1/his14566.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171205/2/his14566_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/his.14566
dc.identifier.sourceHistopathology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManner H, Pech O, Heldmann Y et al. The frequency of lymph node metastasis in early- stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with incipient submucosal invasion (pT1b sm1) depending on histological risk patterns. Surg. Endosc. 2015; 29; 1888 - 1896.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSgourakis G, Gockel I, Lang H. Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: a systematic review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 19; 1424 - 1437.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVieth M, Stolte M. Pathology of early upper GI cancers. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2005; 19; 857 - 869.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLohneis P, Hieggelke L, Gebauer F et al. Tumor budding assessed according to the criteria of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference determines prognosis in resected esophageal adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2021; 478; 393 - 400.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg KB, Schaeffer DF. Tumor budding as a standardized parameter in gastrointestinal carcinomas: more than just the colon. Mod. Pathol. 2018; 31; 862 - 872.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLugli A, Kirsch R, Ajioka Y et al. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016. Mod. Pathol. 2017; 30; 1299 - 1311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFotis D, Doukas M, Wijnhoven BPL et al. Submucosal invasion and risk of lymph node invasion in early Barrett- s cancer: potential impact of different classification systems on patient management. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2015; 3; 505 - 513.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003; 58 ( 6 Suppl ); S3 - S43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUpdate on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy 2005; 37; 570 - 578.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu L, Hofstetter WL, Rashid A et al. Significance of the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis in superficially invasive (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005; 29; 1079 - 1085.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHölscher AH, Vallböhmer D, Bollschweiler E. Early Barrett- s carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008; 14; 347 - 354.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBourke MJ, Neuhaus H, Bergman JJ. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: indications and application in western endoscopy practice. Gastroenterology 2018; 154; 1887 - 1900.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGotink AW, Kate FJC, Doukas M et al. Do pathologists agree with each other on the histological assessment of pT1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma? United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2019; 7; 261 - 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett- s oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63; 7 - 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlvarez Herrero L, Pouw R, van Vilsteren F et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis associated with deeper invasion by early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: study based on endoscopic resection specimens. Endoscopy 2010; 42; 1030 - 1036.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchölvinck D, Künzli H, Meijer S et al. Management of patients with T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on patient management and risk of metastatic disease. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30; 4102 - 4113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeusten B, Bisschops R, Coron E et al. Endoscopic management of Barrett- s esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2017; 49; 191 - 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG et al. American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Clinical Guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett- s esophagus. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 111; 30 - 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKünzli HT, Belghazi K, Pouw RE et al. Endoscopic management and follow- up of patients with a submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2018; 6; 669 - 677.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbraham SC, Krasinskas AM, Correa AM et al. Duplication of the muscularis mucosae in Barrett esophagus: an underrecognized feature and its implication for staging of adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007; 31; 1719 - 1725.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaneshiro DK, Post JC, Rybicki L et al. Clinical significance of the duplicated muscularis mucosae in Barrett esophagus- related superficial adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2011; 35; 697 - 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis JT, Wang KK, Abraham SC. Muscularis mucosae duplication and the musculo- fibrous anomaly in endoscopic mucosal resections for Barrett esophagus: implications for staging of adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008; 32; 566 - 571.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim J- Y, Kim W- G, Jeon T- Y et al. Lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: evaluation of a novel method for measuring submucosal invasion and development of a nodal predicting index. Hum. Pathol. 2013; 44; 2829 - 2836.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKouyama Y, Kudo S- E, Miyachi H et al. Practical problems of measuring depth of submucosal invasion in T1 colorectal carcinomas. Int. J. Colorect. Dis. 2016; 31; 137 - 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrmsby AH, Petras RE, Henricks WH et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of superficial oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut 2002; 51; 671 - 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorrell SG, Boys JA, Chandrasoma P et al. Inter- observer variability in the interpretation of endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of esophageal adenocarcinoma: interpretation of ER specimens. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2016; 20; 140 - 145; discussion 144- 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOverwater A, van der Meulen KE, Künzli HT et al. Optimizing histopathologic evaluation of EMR specimens of Barrett’s esophagus- related neoplasia: a randomized study of 3 specimen handling methods. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2019; 90; 384 - 392.e5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett C, Vakil N, Bergman J et al. Consensus statements for management of Barrett- s dysplasia and early- stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process. Gastroenterology 2012; 143; 336 - 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeMeester SR, DeMeester TR. The diagnosis and management of Barrett- s esophagus. Adv. Surg. 1999; 33; 29 - 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGockel I, Exner C, Junginger T. Morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: a risk analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2005; 3; 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumarasinghe MP, Armstrong M, Foo J et al. The modern management of Barrett- s oesophagus and related neoplasia: the role of pathology. Histopathology 2021; 78; 18 - 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumarasinghe MP, Bourke MJ, Brown I et al. Pathological assessment of endoscopic resections of the gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive clinicopathologic review. Mod. Pathol. 2020; 33; 986 - 1006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeewald S, Ang TL, Pouw RE et al. Management of early- stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2018; 63; 2146 - 2154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManner H, May A, Pech O et al. Early Barrett- s carcinoma with - low- risk- submucosal invasion: long- term results of endoscopic resection with a curative intent. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008; 103; 2589 - 2597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAncona E, Rampado S, Cassaro M et al. Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008; 15; 3278 - 3288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGockel I, Sgourakis G, Lyros O et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in submucosal esophageal cancer: a review of surgically resected patients. Exp. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011; 5; 371 - 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManner H, Pech O, Heldmann Y et al. Efficacy, safety, and long- term results of endoscopic treatment for early stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with low- risk sm1 invasion. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013; 11; 630 - 635.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters FP, Brakenhoff KPM, Curvers WL et al. Histologic evaluation of resection specimens obtained at 293 endoscopic resections in Barrett- s esophagus. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008; 67; 604 - 609.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMetzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallböhmer D et al. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? Dis. Esophagus 2004; 17; 310 - 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePortney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000; 585 - 618.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1960; 20; 37 - 46.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
his14566.pdf
Size:
16.58MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
his14566_am.pdf
Size:
366.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.