Show simple item record

Use of a mobile app to capture supplemental health information during pregnancy: Implications for clinical research

dc.contributor.authorRothschild, Claire W.
dc.contributor.authorDublin, Sascha
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorKlasnja, Predrag
dc.contributor.authorHerzig-Marx, Chayim
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Juliane S.
dc.contributor.authorWyner, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Christina
dc.contributor.authorMartin, David
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T15:51:00Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06 10:50:59en
dc.date.available2022-01-06T15:51:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-01
dc.identifier.citationRothschild, Claire W.; Dublin, Sascha; Brown, Jeffrey S.; Klasnja, Predrag; Herzig-Marx, Chayim ; Reynolds, Juliane S.; Wyner, Zachary; Chambers, Christina; Martin, David (2022). "Use of a mobile app to capture supplemental health information during pregnancy: Implications for clinical research." Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 31(1): 37-45.
dc.identifier.issn1053-8569
dc.identifier.issn1099-1557
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171216
dc.description.abstractPurposeMobile applications (- apps- ) may be efficient tools for improving the quality of clinical research among pregnant women, but evidence is sparse. We assess the feasibility and generalizability of a mobile app for capturing supplemental data during pregnancy.MethodsIn 2017, we conducted a pilot study of the FDA MyStudies mobile app within a pregnant population identified through Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA), an integrated healthcare delivery system. We ascertained health conditions, medications, and substance use through app- based questionnaires. In a post- hoc analysis, we utilized electronic health records (EHR) to summarize sociodemographic and health characteristics of pilot participants and, for comparison, a pregnant population identified using similar methods.ResultsSix percent (64/1070) of contacted women enrolled in the pilot study. Nearly half (23/53) reported taking medication for headaches and one- fourth for constipation (13/53) and nausea (12/53) each. Few instances (2/92) of over- the- counter medication use were identified in electronic dispensing records. One- quarter to one- third of participants with depression and anxiety/panic, respectively, reported recently discontinuing medications for these conditions. Eighty- eight percent of pilot participants reported White race (95%CI: 81- 95%), versus 67% of the comparison population (N = 2065). More pilot participants filled - ¥1 prescription for antianxiety medication (22% [95%CI: 13- 35%]) and antidepressants (19% [95%CI 10- 31%]) pre- pregnancy than the comparison population (10 and 9%, respectively).ConclusionsMobile apps may be a feasible tool for capturing health data not routinely available in EHR. Pregnant women willing to use a mobile app for research may differ from the general pregnant population, but confirmation is needed.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherpatient selection
dc.subject.otherpregnancy
dc.subject.otherpregnancy research
dc.subject.othercell phone
dc.subject.otherdata collection
dc.subject.othermobile apps
dc.titleUse of a mobile app to capture supplemental health information during pregnancy: Implications for clinical research
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemistry
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171216/1/pds5320_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171216/2/pds5320.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pds.5320
dc.identifier.sourcePharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorpe PG, Gilboa SM, Hernandez- Diaz S, et al. Medications in the first trimester of pregnancy: most common exposures and critical gaps in understanding fetal risk. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Sep; 22 ( 9 ): 1013 - 1018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldkind SF, Sahin L, Gallauresi B. Enrolling pregnant women in research- lessons from the H1N1 influenza pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362 ( 24 ): 2241 - 2243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThackeray R, Crookston BT, West JH. Correlates of health- related social media use among adults. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15 ( 1 ): e21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll JK, Moorhead A, Bond R, LeBlanc WG, Petrella RJ, Fiscella K. Who uses Mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19 ( 4 ): e125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIlloh OA, Toh S, Andrade SE, et al. Utilization of drugs with pregnancy exposure registries during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018; 27 ( 6 ): 604 - 611.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrade SE, Gurwitz JH, Davis RL, et al. Prescription drug use in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191 ( 2 ): 398 - 407.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTask Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women. Report Implementation Plan to the Secretary, Health and Human Services, Congress. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/PRGLAC_Implement_Plan_083120.pdf Published 2008. Accessed July 7, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShortreed SM, Von Korff M, Thielke S, et al. Electronic health records to evaluate and account for non- response bias: a survey of patients using chronic opioid therapy. Observ Stud. 2016; 2: 24 - 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallwiener S, Müller M, Doster A, et al. Pregnancy eHealth and mHealth: user proportions and characteristics of pregnant women using Web- based information sources- a cross- sectional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 294 ( 5 ): 937 - 944.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarangarm P, Young B, Rayburn W, et al. Agreement between self- report and prescription data in medical records for pregnant women. Birth Defects Res Part A: Clin Mol Teratol. 2012; 94 ( 3 ): 153 - 161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLupattelli A, Spigset O, Björnsdóttir I, et al. Patterns and factors associated with low adherence to psychotropic medications during pregnancy- a cross- sectional multinational web- based study. Depression Anxiety. 2015; 32 ( 6 ): 426 - 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTai B, AT ML. Integrating information on substance use disorders into electronic health record systems. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012; 43 ( 1 ): 12 - 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKebodeaux CD. Prescription and over- the- counter medication record integration: a holistic patient- centered approach. Digital Health. 2019; 59 ( 2 ): S13 - S17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNielsen MW, Søndergaard B, Kjøller M, Hansen EH. Agreement between self- reported data on medicine use and prescription records vary according to method of analysis and therapeutic group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Sep; 61 ( 9 ): 919 - 924.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSison CP, Glaz J. Simultaneous confidence intervals and sample size determination for multinomial proportions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995; 90 ( 429 ): 366 - 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWyner Z, Dublin S, Chambers C, et al. The FDA MyStudies app: a reusable platform for distributed clinical trials and real- world evidence studies. JAMIA Open. 2020; 3 ( 4 ): 500 - 505.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWyner Z, Dublin S, Reynolds J, et al. The FDA MyStudies App: Patient centered outcomes research trust fund enabler for distributed clinical trials and real world evidence studies: Collection of patient- provided information through a mobile device application for use in comparative effectively and drug safety research; 2018. https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/259016/AppendicesCollectionPatientProvidedInfo.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan MMHJ G, PJFM M, van Drongelen J, Swarts JW, van de Belt TH, Roeleveld N. The PRIDE study: evaluation of online methods of data collection. Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol. 2020; 34 ( 5 ): 484 - 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatch EE, Hahn KA, Wise LA, et al. Evaluation of selection bias in an internet- based study of pregnancy planners. Epidemiology. 2016 Jan; 27 ( 1 ): 98 - 104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson J, Rainie L. Main Findings: Apps vs. Web: Winner?. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRadin JM, Steinhubl SR, Su AI, et al. The healthy pregnancy research program: transforming pregnancy research through a ResearchKit app. NPJ Digit Med. 2018; 1: 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcInerney KA, Hatch EE, Wesselink AK, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, Wise LA. Preconception use of pain- relievers and time- to- pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. 2017; 32 ( 1 ): 103 - 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWise LA, Wesselink AK, Hatch EE, et al. Changes in behavior with increasing pregnancy attempt time: a prospective cohort study. Epidemiology. 2020 Sep; 31 ( 5 ): 659 - 667.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMikkelsen EM, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Rothman KJ, Riis A, Sørensen HT. Cohort profile: the Danish web- based pregnancy planning study- ’Snart- Gravid’. Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Aug; 38 ( 4 ): 938 - 943.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuybrechts KF, Mikkelsen EM, Christensen T, et al. A successful implementation of e- epidemiology: the Danish pregnancy planning study ’Snart- Gravid’. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010; 25 ( 5 ): 297 - 304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWise LA, Rothman KJ, Mikkelsen EM, et al. Design and conduct of an internet- based preconception cohort study in North America: pregnancy study online. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015; 29 ( 4 ): 360 - 371.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roukema J, et al. Rationale and design of the PRegnancy and infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013; 27 ( 1 ): 34 - 43.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson M. Mobile Technology and Home Broadband 2019. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuybrechts KF, Bateman BT, Hernández- Díaz S. Use of real- world evidence from healthcare utilization data to evaluate drug safety during pregnancy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019; 28 ( 7 ): 906 - 922.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.