Show simple item record

Optimal diagnostic test allocation strategy during the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond

dc.contributor.authorDu, Jiacong
dc.contributor.authorJ Beesley, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorLee, Seunggeun
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Xiang
dc.contributor.authorDempsey, Walter
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Bhramar
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T15:52:01Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06 10:51:59en
dc.date.available2022-01-06T15:52:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-30
dc.identifier.citationDu, Jiacong; J Beesley, Lauren; Lee, Seunggeun; Zhou, Xiang; Dempsey, Walter; Mukherjee, Bhramar (2022). "Optimal diagnostic test allocation strategy during the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond." Statistics in Medicine 41(2): 310-327.
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171239
dc.description.abstractTimely diagnostic testing for active SARS‐CoV‐2 viral infections is key to controlling the spread of the virus and preventing severe disease. A central public health challenge is defining test allocation strategies with limited resources. In this paper, we provide a mathematical framework for defining an optimal strategy for allocating viral diagnostic tests. The framework accounts for imperfect test results, selective testing in certain high‐risk patient populations, practical constraints in terms of budget and/or total number of available tests, and the purpose of testing. Our method is not only useful for detecting infections, but can also be used for long‐time surveillance to detect new outbreaks. In our proposed approach, tests can be allocated across population strata defined by symptom severity and other patient characteristics, allowing the test allocation plan to prioritize higher risk patient populations. We illustrate our framework using historical data from the initial wave of the COVID‐19 outbreak in New York City. We extend our proposed method to address the challenge of allocating two different types of diagnostic tests with different costs and accuracy, for example, the RT‐PCR and the rapid antigen test (RAT), under budget constraints. We show how this latter framework can be useful to reopening of college campuses where university administrators are challenged with finite resources for community surveillance. We provide a R Shiny web application allowing users to explore test allocation strategies across a variety of pandemic scenarios. This work can serve as a useful tool for guiding public health decision‐making at a community level and adapting testing plans to different stages of an epidemic. The conceptual framework has broader relevance beyond the current COVID‐19 pandemic.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherCOVID‐19 diagnostic RT‐PCR test
dc.subject.otherfalse negatives
dc.subject.otherrapid antigen testing
dc.subject.othersafe reopening
dc.titleOptimal diagnostic test allocation strategy during the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Data
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171239/1/sim9238_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171239/2/sim9238.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171239/3/sim9238-sup-0001-supinfo.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.9238
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicine
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of COVID‐19 among children in China. Pediatrics. 2020; 145 ( 6 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrist C. Group screening could help COVID‐19 test shortages; 2020. https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200514/group‐screening‐could‐help‐covid‐19‐test‐shortages. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroadfoot M. Coronavirus test shortages trigger a new strategy: group screening; 2020. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus‐test‐shortages‐trigger‐a‐new‐strategy‐group‐screening2/#:∼:text=Such%20false%20negatives%20have%20plagued,of%20a%20pathogen%20remains%20low. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLefkowitz M. Group testing could screen entire US, research suggests; 2020. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2020/06/group‐testing‐could‐screen‐entire‐us‐research‐suggests. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonnerby J, Lazos P, Lock E, et al. Maximising the benefits of an acutely limited number of COVID‐19 tests; 2020. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13650.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEly J, Galeotti A, Steiner J. Optimal test allocation. Technical report. Mimeo; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanyani T, Kremer C, Chen D, et al. Estimating the generation interval for coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) based on symptom onset data. Eurosurveillance. 2020; 25 ( 17 ): 2000257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChampredon D, Dushoff J. Intrinsic and realized generation intervals in infectious‐disease transmission. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 2015; 282 ( 1821 ): 20152026.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin J, Casey M, Collins Á, et al. Rapid review of available evidence on the serial interval and generation time of COVID‐19. BMJ Open. 2020; 10 ( 11 ): e040263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrooks ZC, Das S. COVID‐19 testing: impact of prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity on patient risk and cost. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020; 154 ( 5 ): 575 ‐ 584.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBöger B, Fachi MM, Vilhena RO, Cobre AF, Tonin FS, Pontarolo R. Systematic review with meta‐analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID‐19. Am J Infect Control. 2021; 49 ( 1 ): 21 ‐ 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang L, Zhou Y, He J, et al. An epidemiological forecast model and software assessing interventions on the COVID‐19 epidemic in China. J Data Sci. 2020; 18 ( 3 ): 409 ‐ 432.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHao X, Cheng S, Wu D, Wu T, Lin X, Wang C. Reconstruction of the full transmission dynamics of COVID‐19 in Wuhan. Nature. 2020; 584 ( 7821 ): 420 ‐ 424.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNew York State Department of Health. Weekly influenza surveillance report; 2021. https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/influenza/surveillance/2019‐2020/archive/. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Coronavirus case counts and hospitalized counts by age; 2021. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid‐19‐data.page. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWellmann R. R package optiSolve; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGupta M, Mohanta SS, Rao A, et al. Transmission dynamics of the COVID‐19 epidemic in India, and evaluating the impact of asymptomatic carriers and role of expanded testing in the lockdown exit strategy: a modelling approach. medRxiv; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSubramanian R, He Q, Pascual M. Quantifying asymptomatic infection and transmission of COVID‐19 in New York City using observed cases, serology, and testing capacity. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2021; 118 ( 9 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Cases, hospitalizations and deaths; 2021. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid‐19‐data.page. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiddarth D, Katz R, Graeden E, Allen D, Tsai T. Evidence roundup: why positive test rates need to fall below 3%; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Daily COVID‐19 case counts and tests; 2021. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid‐19‐data.page. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRahmandad H, Lim TY, Sterman J. Estimating COVID‐19 under‐reporting across 86 nations: implications for projections and control; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe COVID Tracking Project. https://covidtracking.com/data/national. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoloshin S, Patel N, Kesselheim AS. False negative tests for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection‐challenges and implications. New Engl J Med. 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElbanna A, Wong GN, Weiner ZJ, et al. Entry screening and multi‐layer mitigation of COVID‐19 cases for a safe university reopening. medRxiv; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandenberg O, Martiny D, Rochas O, Belkum vA, Kozlakidis Z. Considerations for diagnostic COVID‐19 tests. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2020; 1 ‐ 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNagura‐Ikeda M, Imai K, Tabata S, et al. Clinical evaluation of self‐collected saliva by quantitative reverse transcription‐PCR (RT‐qPCR), direct RT‐qPCR, reverse transcription–loop‐mediated isothermal amplification, and a rapid antigen test to diagnose COVID‐19. J Clin Microbiol. 2020; 58 ( 9 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIGeneX, Inc. Description of COVID‐19 tests; 2021. https://igenex.com/igenex‐covid‐19‐testing/. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbbott Laboratories. Abbott’s fast, $5, 15‐minute, easy‐to‐use COVID‐19 antigen test receives FDA emergency use authorization; mobile app displays test results to help our return to daily life; ramping production to 50 million tests a month; 2020. https://abbott.mediaroom.com/2020‐08‐26‐Abbotts‐Fast‐5‐15‐Minute‐Easy‐to‐Use‐COVID‐19‐Antigen‐Test‐Receives‐FDA‐Emergency‐Use‐Authorization‐Mobile‐App‐Displays‐Test‐Results‐to‐Help‐Our‐Return‐to‐Daily‐Life‐Ramping‐Production‐to‐50‐Million‐Tests‐a‐Month#:∼:text=ABBOTT%20PARK%2C%20Ill.%2C%20Aug,sell%20this%20test%20for%20%245. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalathé M, Althaus CL, Neher R, et al. COVID‐19 epidemic in Switzerland: on the importance of testing, contact tracing and isolation. Swiss Med Weekly. 2020; 150 ( 1112 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManabe YC, Sharfstein JS, Armstrong K. The need for more and better testing for COVID‐19. Jama. 2020; 324 ( 21 ): 2153 ‐ 2154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrassly N, Pons Salort M, Parker E, et al. Report 16: role of testing in COVID‐19 control; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Food & Drug Administration. Coronavirus testing basics. https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer‐updates/coronavirus‐testing‐basics. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceService RF. Coronavirus antigen tests: quick and cheap, but too often wrong; 2020. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/coronavirus‐antigen‐tests‐quick‐and‐cheap‐too‐often‐wrong. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Food & Drug Administration. Update: FDA authorizes first COVID‐19 test for self‐testing at home; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomer P. Webinar: how to re‐start the economy after COVID‐19; 2021. https://bcf.princeton.edu/event‐directory/covid19_04/. Accessed May 19, 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleevely M, Susskind D, Vines D, Vines L, Wills S. A workable strategy for Covid‐19 testing: stratified periodic testing rather than universal random testing1. Covid Economics. 2020; 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEliaz Y, Danovich M, Gasic GP. Poolkeh finds the optimal pooling strategy for a population‐wide COVID‐19 testing (Israel, UK, and US as Test Cases). MedRxiv; 2020.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.