Show simple item record

Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy EDGE Task Force: A Systematic Review of Measures of Balance in Adult Cancer Survivors

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Min H
dc.contributor.authorHile, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorCroarkin, Earllaine
dc.contributor.authorWampler-Kuhn, Meredith
dc.contributor.authorBlackwood, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorColon, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorPfalzer, Lucinda A
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-20T20:24:59Z
dc.date.available2022-01-20T20:24:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01
dc.identifier.issn2168-3808
dc.identifier.issn2381-2427
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000480688300006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=cc40378bfc9614a14500fbd6db90869f
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171458en
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: Balance impairments are prevalent in adult cancer survivors, leading to increased fall risk and reduced quality of life. To identify survivors in need of balance and fall interventions and to track change with intervention, health care providers need measures with sound psychometric properties and high clinical utility. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify reliable, valid, and clinically useful measures of balance impairments in adult cancer survivors. Secondary purposes were to obtain minimal detectable change of identified balance measures and to determine use of measures to evaluate fall risk. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to assess psychometric properties and clinical utility of balance measures identified from the literature search. Two reviewers in a team independently extracted data from articles and evaluated cumulative evidence for each balance measure using the Cancer EDGE Task Force Outcome Measure Rating Form. Results: The search located 187 articles, with 54 articles retained for quality assessment of balance measures. The Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale and gait speed were highly recommended (rated 4). Balance Evaluation Systems Test, Timed Up and Go, and Five Times Sit to Stand were recommended (rated 3). Limitations: Selection bias is possible. Samples and settings across reviewed studies were widely heterogeneous. Conclusions: We recommend 5 balance measures for use in adult cancer survivors. Future research with existing balance measures should establish norms, responsiveness, and predictive validity for fall risk, while expanding to focus on imbalance in midlife survivors. Patient-reported outcome measures are needed for cancer-related imbalance.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
dc.subjectneoplasm
dc.subjectoutcome measures
dc.subjectpostural stability
dc.subjectpsychometrics
dc.titleAcademy of Oncologic Physical Therapy EDGE Task Force: A Systematic Review of Measures of Balance in Adult Cancer Survivors
dc.typeArticle
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171458/2/Academy of Oncologic Physical Therapy_EDGE.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000177
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/3970
dc.identifier.sourceRehabilitation Oncology
dc.description.versionPublished version
dc.date.updated2022-01-20T20:24:58Z
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1514-2186
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage92
dc.identifier.endpage103
dc.identifier.name-orcidHuang, Min H
dc.identifier.name-orcidHile, Elizabeth
dc.identifier.name-orcidCroarkin, Earllaine
dc.identifier.name-orcidWampler-Kuhn, Meredith
dc.identifier.name-orcidBlackwood, Jennifer; 0000-0003-1514-2186
dc.identifier.name-orcidColon, Genevieve
dc.identifier.name-orcidPfalzer, Lucinda A
dc.working.doi10.7302/3970en
dc.owningcollnameHealth Sciences, College of (UM-Flint)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.