Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization (Version 2.0)
dc.contributor.author | Langhorst, Tim | |
dc.contributor.author | McCord, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Zimmermann, Arno | |
dc.contributor.author | Müller, Leonard | |
dc.contributor.author | Cremonese, Lorenzo | |
dc.contributor.author | Strunge, Till | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Yuan | |
dc.contributor.author | Zaragoza, Ana Villa | |
dc.contributor.author | Wunderlich, Johannes | |
dc.contributor.author | Marxen, Annika | |
dc.contributor.author | Armstrong, Katy | |
dc.contributor.author | Buchner, Georg | |
dc.contributor.author | Kätelhön, Arne | |
dc.contributor.author | Bachmann, Marvin | |
dc.contributor.author | Sternberg, André | |
dc.contributor.author | Michailos, Stavros | |
dc.contributor.author | Naims, Henriette | |
dc.contributor.author | Winter, Benedikt | |
dc.contributor.author | Roskosch, Dennis | |
dc.contributor.author | Faber, Grant | |
dc.contributor.author | Mangin, Christophe | |
dc.contributor.author | Olfe-Kräutlein, Barbara | |
dc.contributor.author | Styring, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Schomäcker, Reinhard | |
dc.contributor.author | Bardow, André | |
dc.contributor.author | Sick, Volker | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T10:51:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T10:51:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-03-17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171800 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time. Under the auspices of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and through the Paris Agreement, there is a commitment to keep global temperature rise this century to well below two degrees Celsius compared with pre-industrial levels. This will require a variety of strategies, including increased renewable power generation, broad-scale electrification, greater energy efficiency, and carbon-negative technologies. With increasing support worldwide, innovations in carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies are now widely acknowledged to contribute to achieving climate mitigation targets while creating economic opportunities. To assess the environmental impacts and commercial competitiveness of these innovations, consistent and transparent Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Techno-Economic Assessment (TEA) are needed. Against this background, guidelines (Version 1.0) on LCA and TEA were published in 2018 and updated (Version 1.1) in 2020 as a valuable toolkit for evaluating and guiding CCU technology development. Ever since, an open community of practitioners, commissioners, and users of such assessments has been involved in gathering feedback on the document. That feedback has informed the improvements and the expansion incorporated in Version 2.0 of the Guidelines. This revised and expanded version 2.0 of the Guidelines has again been developed by a team of researchers at RWTH Aachen, TU Berlin, the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies Potsdam, the University of Sheffield, and the University of Michigan. Several workshops, the work of the International CCU Assessment Harmonization Group, and feedback from practitioners and users of LCA and TEA studies, have contributed to this updated version. Version 2.0 includes new chapters on integrated assessments that combine LCA and TEA, how to assess early-stage technologies, and how to include social impact in LCA and TEA. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | EIT Climate-KIC | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | CCU | en_US |
dc.subject | LCA | en_US |
dc.subject | CO2 utilization | en_US |
dc.subject | life cycle assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | techno-economic assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | TEA | en_US |
dc.subject | social life cycle assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | low technology readiness level | en_US |
dc.subject | integrated TEA and LCA | en_US |
dc.title | Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization (Version 2.0) | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Mechanical Engineering | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Mechanical Engineering, Department of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Global CO2 Initiative | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | ETH Zürich | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Sheffield, UK | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RWTH Aachen | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Sheffield, UK | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Sheffield, UK | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RWTH Aachen | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RWTH Aachen | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | RWTH Aachen | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Sheffield, UK | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | ETH Zürich | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | ETH Zürich | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Potsdam | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Sheffield, UK | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Technische Universität Berlin | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | ETH Zürich | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171800/1/TEA & LCA Guidelines for CCU v2.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4190 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of TEA & LCA Guidelines for CCU v2.pdf : Report document | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/4190 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Global CO2 Initiative |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.