Mixed Methods Analysis of Consumer Fraud Reports of the Social Security Administration Impostor Scam
dc.contributor.author | DeLiema, Marguerite | |
dc.contributor.author | Witt, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-04T20:11:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-04T20:11:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | DeLiema, Marguerite, and Paul Witt. 2021. “Mixed Methods Analysis of Consumer Fraud Reports of the Social Security Administration Impostor Scam.” Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center (MRDRC) Working Paper; MRDRC WP 2021-434. https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp434.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171805 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Most Americans have received fraudulent calls from impostors claiming to be officials from the Social Security Administration (SSA). Callers threaten those who respond with arrest and suspension of their bank accounts and Social Security numbers, but charges can be removed if the target agrees to buy retail gift cards, wire money, or deposit cash in cryptocurrency ATMs. This paper uses mixed methods to analyze SSA imposter scam consumer reports from victims and attempted victims filed in the Consumer Sentinel. Qualitative analysis of 600 case narratives reveals that SSA impostors use the persuasion principals of authority, reciprocity, liking, and scarcity to put pressure on consumers to comply with their requests. Expressions of fear, anger, anticipation, and trust in the imposter were present in the victim case narratives. Qualitative findings were supported using a quantitative sentiment analysis of more than 200,000 consumer reports to count the frequency of emotion words in case narratives. Emotional expressions were significantly associated with reported victimization versus attempted victimization. Quantitative models show that older adult consumers are significantly less likely to report victimization relative to those 30 and younger, but older victims lose significantly more money per incident on average. Results also indicate that consumers from majority Black, Asian, and Hispanic communities are more likely report victimization, although victims from non-Hispanic White communities report higher average loses. Consumer education on government imposter scams, specifically targeting young people and minorities, as well as greater controls on retail gift card sales, might help limit consumer losses. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | U.S. Social Security Administration, RDR18000002-03, UM21-Q1 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP 2021-434 | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Security; consumer fraud | en_US |
dc.title | Mixed Methods Analysis of Consumer Fraud Reports of the Social Security Administration Impostor Scam | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Population and Demography | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Michigan Retirement Research Center | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Minnesota School of Social Work | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Federal Trade Commission, Division of Consumer Response and Operations | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171805/1/wp434.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4195 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of wp434.pdf : working paper | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/4195 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Retirement and Disability Research Center, Michigan (MRDRC) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.