View Item 

Show simple item record

A longitudinal analysis of smoke‐free laws and smoking initiation disparities among young adults in the United States
dc.contributor.authorTitus, Andrea R.
dc.contributor.authorXie, Yanmei
dc.contributor.authorThrasher, James F.
dc.contributor.authorLevy, David T.
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Megan E.
dc.contributor.authorFleischer, Nancy L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T03:11:09Z
dc.date.available2023-04-06 22:11:08en
dc.date.available2022-03-07T03:11:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifier.citationTitus, Andrea R.; Xie, Yanmei; Thrasher, James F.; Levy, David T.; Elliott, Michael R.; Patrick, Megan E.; Fleischer, Nancy L. (2022). "A longitudinal analysis of smoke‐free laws and smoking initiation disparities among young adults in the United States." Addiction 117(3): 730-738.
dc.identifier.issn0965-2140
dc.identifier.issn1360-0443
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171820
dc.description.abstractBackground and AimsTobacco control policies may differentially impact smoking initiation among socio‐demographic groups. We measured longitudinal associations between exposure to smoke‐free laws in grade 12 (modal age 18 years) and patterns of smoking initiation in the United States.DesignProspective longitudinal analysis.Setting and ParticipantsWe used data on US young adults sampled at modal age 18 years from the Monitoring the Future Survey. Baseline data were collected between 2000 and 2017, with the last year of follow‐up in 2018. The sample number varied by outcome and time‐point, ranging from 7314 to 17 702.MeasurementsSmoke‐free law coverage in work‐places and hospitality venues (restaurants/bars) was measured as the percentage of the county population covered by each type of law. We examined associations with any past 30‐day smoking initiation and daily smoking initiation at modal ages 19/20, 21/22 and 23/24, using Poisson regression and calculating average marginal effects. We explored effect modification by sex, race/ethnicity and parental education by testing the significance of interaction terms.FindingsWork‐place law coverage at modal age 18 was associated with a lower probability of daily smoking initiation at modal ages 21/22 [−2.4 percentage points (p.p.); 95% confidence interval (CI) = −3.9, –0.9] and 23/24 (−2.0 p.p.; 95% CI = −3.9, –0.2). Hospitality law coverage was associated with a lower probability of daily smoking initiation at modal ages 19/20 (−1.6 p.p.; 95% CI = −2.8, –0.4), 21/22 (−2.3 p.p.; 95% CI = −3.7, –0.9) and 23/24 (−1.8 p.p.; 95% CI = −3.6, –0.0). Findings were inconclusive with regard to associations with any past 30‐day smoking initiation and with regard to effect modification, after adjusting for multiple testing.ConclusionsExposure to smoke‐free laws at age 18 appears to be prospectively associated with reduced daily smoking initiation 1–6 years later.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan
dc.subject.othersmoking initiation
dc.subject.otherHealth disparities
dc.subject.otherhealth equity
dc.subject.otherpublic policy
dc.subject.othersmoke‐free law
dc.subject.othertobacco
dc.titleA longitudinal analysis of smoke‐free laws and smoking initiation disparities among young adults in the United States
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171820/1/add15658.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171820/2/add15658_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/add.15658
dc.identifier.sourceAddiction
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUniversity of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research. Available at: http://ukcpr.org/ (accessed 8 January 2020).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelakorpi S, Martelin T, Torppa J, Patja K, Vartiainen E, Uutela A. Did Finland’s tobacco control act of 1976 have an impact on ever smoking? An examination based on male and female cohort trends. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58: 649 – 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatikireddi SV, Der G, Roberts C, Haw S. Has childhood smoking reduced following smoke‐free public places legislation? A segmented regression analysis of cross‐sectional UK school‐based surveys. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 18: 1670 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong AV, Dutra LM, Neilands TB, Glantz SA. Association of smoke‐free laws with lower percentages of new and current smokers among adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169: e152285.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShang C. The effect of smoke‐free air law in bars on smoking initiation and relapse among teenagers and young adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12: 504 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel M, Albers AB, Cheng DM, Hamilton WL, Biener L. Local restaurant smoking regulations and the adolescent smoking initiation process. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008; 162: 477 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChaloupka FJ, Pacula RL. Sex and race differences in young people’s responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies. Tob Control. 1999; 8: 373 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiech RA, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE, Patrick ME. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2019: vol. I, Secondary School Students. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2019: vol. II, College Students and Adults Ages 19–60. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWohlwend H. 5,001 and Counting: ANRF’s U.S. Tobacco Control Laws Database. American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation| no‐smoke.org. 2018. Available at: https://no-smoke.org/5001-and-counting-anrfs-u-s-tobacco-control-database/ (accessed 21 January 2019).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Census Bureau. City and Town Population Totals: 2010–2017. Available at: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2010s-total-cities-and-towns.html (accessed 1 November 2018).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTitus AR, Kalousova L, Meza R, et al. Smoke‐free policies and smoking cessation in the United States, 2003–2015. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 3200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. 100% Smokefree Definitions. American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation no‐smoke.org. Available at: https://no-smoke.org/100-smokefree-definitions/ (accessed 17 July 2018).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrell JS, Bangdiwala SI, Deng S, Webb JP, Bradley C. Smoking initiation in youth: the roles of gender, race, socioeconomics, and developmental status. J Adolesc Health. 1998; 23: 271 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSurvey of Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). U.S. State and County Population Data. Available at: https://data.nber.org/data/seer_u.s._county_population_data.html (accessed 9 January 2020).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Census Bureau Census 2000, Summary File 3 (SF 3)—Sample Data, table QT–P20—Educational Attainment by Sex; generated using American FactFinder; 2017. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov (accessed 1 January 2019).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2005–2017 American Community Survey 1‐Year Estimates, Table GCT0101; generated using American FactFinder; 2017. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov (accessed 1 January 2019).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Tax Burden on Tobacco, 1970–2017. Chronic Disease and Health Promotion Data and Indicators. Available at: https://chronicdata.cdc.gov/Policy/The‐Tax‐Burden‐on‐Tobacco‐1970‐2017/7nwe‐3aj9 (accessed 1 January 2019).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Bureau of Economic Analysis, Gross Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator [GDPDEF]. FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. Available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPDEF (accessed 10 June 2019).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenland S. Model‐based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case‐control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160: 301 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams R. Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 2012; 12: 308 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnol MJ, VanderWeele TJ. Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction. Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 41: 514 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B Methodol. 1995; 57: 289 – 300.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBachman JG, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Schulenberg JE, Miech RA. The Monitoring the Future Project After Four Decades: Design and Procedures (Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper no. 82). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIVEware: Imputation and Variance Estimation Software, Version 0.3. Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. https://www.src.isr.umich.edu/software/ (accessed 8 January 2020).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarynak K. State and territorial Laws prohibiting sales of tobacco products to persons aged 21 years—United States, December 20, 2019. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 69 ( 7 ): 189 – 192. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6907a3
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreedman KS, Nelson NM, Feldman LL. Smoking initiation among young adults in the United States and Canada, 1998–2010: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 2012; 9 ( E05 ). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3277388/ (accessed 1 December 2019).
dc.identifier.citedreferencePreventing Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults. A Report of the Surgeon General: (603152012–001). 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/e603152012-001
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel M, Albers AB, Cheng DM, Biener L, Rigotti NA. Effect of local restaurant smoking regulations on progression to established smoking among youths. Tob Control. 2005; 14: 300 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy DT, Friend KB. The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know? Health Educ Res. 2003;18; 592 – 609.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCreamer MR. Tobacco product use and cessation indicators among adults—United States, 2018. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68 ( 45 ): 1013 – 1019. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a2
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCDCTobaccoFree. Burden of Tobacco Use in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/resources/data/cigarette-smoking-in-united-states.html (accessed 5 June 2018).
dc.identifier.citedreferencePampel FC, Mollborn S, Lawrence EM. Life course transitions in early adulthood and SES disparities in tobacco use. Soc Sci Res. 2014; 43: 45 – 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards R. Has the time come to focus on (young adult) smoking uptake prevention? Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 22: 1061 – 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyland A, Barnoya J, Corral JE. Smoke‐free air policies: past, present and future. Tob Control. 2012; 21: 154 – 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzalez M, Sanders‐Jackson A, Song AV, Cheng K, Glantz SA. Strong smoke‐free law coverage in the United States by race/ethnicity: 2000–2009. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: e62 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. Summary of 100% Smokefree State Laws and Population Protected by 100% U.S. Smokefree Laws. Available at: https://no-smoke.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/SummaryUSPopList.pdf (accessed 21 May 2021).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTauras JA, Huang J, Chaloupka FJ. Differential impact of tobacco control policies on youth sub‐populations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10: 4306 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBotello‐Harbaum MT, Haynie DL, Iannotti RJ, Wang J, Gase L, Simons‐Morton B. Tobacco control policy and adolescent cigarette smoking status in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009; 11: 875 – 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawkins SS, Bach N, Baum CF. Impact of tobacco control policies on adolescent smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2016; 58: 679 – 85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly BC, Vuolo M, Frizzell LC, Hernandez EM. Denormalization, smoke‐free air policy, and tobacco use among young adults. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 211: 70 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrelly MC, Loomis BR, Han B, et al. A comprehensive examination of the influence of state tobacco control programs and policies on youth smoking. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: 549 – 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrelly MC, Loomis BR, Kuiper N, et al. Are tobacco control policies effective in reducing young adult smoking? J Adolesc Health. 2014; 54: 481 – 6.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
add15658.pdf
Size:
582.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
add15658_am.pdf
Size:
393.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.