Show simple item record

Leveling with Tinbergen: Four levels simplified to causes and consequences

dc.contributor.authorBergman, Thore J.
dc.contributor.authorBeehner, Jacinta C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T03:11:14Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06 22:11:13en
dc.date.available2022-03-07T03:11:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-01
dc.identifier.citationBergman, Thore J.; Beehner, Jacinta C. (2022). "Leveling with Tinbergen: Four levels simplified to causes and consequences." Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 31(1): 12-19.
dc.identifier.issn1060-1538
dc.identifier.issn1520-6505
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171823
dc.description.abstractIn 1963, Niko Tinbergen published his foundational manuscript identifying the four questions we ask in animal behavior—how does the behavior emerge across the lifespan (development); how does it work (mechanism); how and why did it evolve (evolution); and why is it adaptive (function). Tinbergen clarified that these ‘levels of analysis’ are complementary, not competing, thereby avoiding many fruitless scientific debates. However, the relationships among the four levels was never established. Here, we propose ‘leveling’ Tinbergen’s questions to a single temporal timescale divided into causes (encompassing mechanism, development, and evolution) and consequences (encompassing function). Scientific advances now seamlessly link evolution, development, and mechanism into a continuum of ‘causes’. The cause–consequence distinction separates the processes that precede (and lead to) a behavior, from the processes that come after (and result from) a behavior. Even for past behaviors, the functional outcomes are (historical) consequences of the causes that preceded them.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherultimate
dc.subject.otherwhy questions
dc.subject.otherlevels of analysis
dc.subject.otherproximate
dc.subject.otherbehavior
dc.subject.otherhow questions
dc.titleLeveling with Tinbergen: Four levels simplified to causes and consequences
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171823/1/evan21931_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171823/2/evan21931.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/evan.21931
dc.identifier.sourceEvolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartins EP. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000; 15: 296 ‐ 299.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhoenix CH, Goy RW, Gerall AA, Young WC. Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female Guinea pig. Endocrinology. 1959; 65: 369 ‐ 382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldman SA, Nottebohm F. Neuronal production, migration, and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus of the adult female canary brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983; 80: 2390 ‐ 2394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinbergen N. The Animal in its World: Explorations of an Ethologist, 1932–1972. Harvard University Press; 1972.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShettleworth SJ. Function, causation, evolution, and development of behavior: a review of the animal in its world, by N. Tinbergen. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22: 581 ‐ 590.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherman PW. The levels of analysis. Anim Behav. 1988; 36: 616 ‐ 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Urso A, Brickner JH. Mechanisms of epigenetic memory. Trends Genet. 2014; 30: 230 ‐ 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZambrano E, Martinez‐Samayoa PM, Bautista CJ, et al. Sex differences in transgenerational alterations of growth and metabolism in progeny (F2) of female offspring (F1) of rats fed a low protein diet during pregnancy and lactation. J Physiol. 2005; 566: 225 ‐ 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAder R, Grota LJ. Effects of early experience on adrenocortical reactivity. Physiol Behav. 1969; 4: 303 ‐ 305.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOyegbile TO, Marler CA. Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Horm Behav. 2005; 48: 259 ‐ 267.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoëls M, de Kloet ER. Control of neuronal excitability by corticosteroid hormones. Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15: 25 ‐ 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDewsbury DA. The proximate and the ultimate: past, present, and future. Behav Process. 1999; 46: 189 ‐ 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirschner M, Gerhart J. Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998; 95: 8420 ‐ 8427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFutuyma DJ. Evolutionary constraint and ecological consequences. Evolution. 2010; 64: 1865 ‐ 1884.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJungers WL. Body size and scaling of limb proportions in primates. In: Jungers WL, ed. Size and Scaling in Primate Biology; Boston, MA: Springer; 1985: 345 ‐ 381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShanahan T. Selfish Genes and Lucky Breaks: Richard Dawkins’ and Stephen jay Gould’s Divergent Darwinian Agendas. The Darwinian Tradition in Context. Springer International Publishing; 2017: 11 ‐ 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunsworth HM. Expanding the evolutionary explanations for sex differences in the human skeleton. Evol Anthropol. 2020; 29: 108 ‐ 116.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuts D. Human sexual selection. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016; 7: 28 ‐ 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalipaud M, Kokko H. Adaptation and plasticity in life‐history theory: how to derive predictions. Evol Hum Behav. 2020; 41: 493 ‐ 501.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFont E, Carazo P. False dichotomies and human sexual size dimorphism: a comment of Dunsworth (2020). Evol Hum Behav. 2021; 42: 176 ‐ 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaaby AB, Rockman MV. The many faces of pleiotropy. Trends Genet. 2013; 29: 66 ‐ 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of san Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979; 205: 581 ‐ 598.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindenfors P, Tullberg BS. Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 1998; 64: 413 ‐ 447.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinbergen N. On aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol. 1963; 20: 410 ‐ 433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNesse RM. Tinbergen’s four questions, organized: a response to Bateson and Laland. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013; 28: 681 ‐ 682.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayr E. Cause and effect in biology. Science. 1961; 134: 1501 ‐ 1506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubenstein DR, Alcock J. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach. Sinauer Inc.; 2018.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDugatkin LA. Principles of Animal Behavior. 4th ed. University of Chicago Press; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlopfer PH, Hailman JP, eds. Function and Evolution of Behavior. Addison‐Wesley; 1972.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlcock J. Sinauer Associates, Inc; 1975. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach..
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSapolsky RM. Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. Penguin; 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaland KN, Sterelny K, Odling‐Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T. Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate‐ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science. 2011; 334: 1512 ‐ 1516.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAriew A. Ernst Mayr’s “ultimate/proximate” distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biol Philos. 2003; 18: 553 ‐ 565.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnold AP, Chen X. What does the “four core genotypes” mouse model tell us about sex differences in the brain and other tissues? Front Neuroendocrinol. 2009; 30: 1 ‐ 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNettle D, Bateson M. Adaptive developmental plasticity: what is it, how can we recognize it and when can it evolve? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015; 282: 20151005.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChampagne FA. Interplay between social experiences and the genome: epigenetic consequences for behavior. Adv Genet. 2012; 77: 33 ‐ 57.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.