View Item 

Show simple item record

Perceived financial decline related to breast reconstruction following mastectomy in a diverse population‐based cohort
dc.contributor.authorBerlin, Nicholas L.
dc.contributor.authorAbrahamse, Paul
dc.contributor.authorMomoh, Adeyiza O.
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authorJagsi, Reshma
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Ann S.
dc.contributor.authorWard, Kevin C.
dc.contributor.authorHawley, Sarah T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T03:12:04Z
dc.date.available2023-04-06 22:12:03en
dc.date.available2022-03-07T03:12:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-15
dc.identifier.citationBerlin, Nicholas L.; Abrahamse, Paul; Momoh, Adeyiza O.; Katz, Steven J.; Jagsi, Reshma; Hamilton, Ann S.; Ward, Kevin C.; Hawley, Sarah T. (2022). "Perceived financial decline related to breast reconstruction following mastectomy in a diverse population‐based cohort." Cancer (6): 1284-1293.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171846
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.subject.otherout‐of‐pocket costs
dc.subject.otherbreast reconstruction
dc.subject.otherfinancial toxicity
dc.titlePerceived financial decline related to breast reconstruction following mastectomy in a diverse population‐based cohort
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171846/1/cncr34048_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171846/2/cncr34048.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.34048
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradley CJ, Neumark D, Luo Z, Bednarek HL. Employment‐contingent health insurance, illness, and labor supply of women: evidence from married women with breast cancer. Health Econ. 2007; 16: 719 ‐ 737.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, et al. Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 919 ‐ 926.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoroneos CJ, Lin YL, Sidey‐Gibbons C, et al. Correlation between financial toxicity, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in an insured population of breast cancer surgical patients: a single‐institution retrospective study. J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 232: 253 ‐ 263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenup RA, Rushing C, Fish L, et al. Financial costs and burden related to decisions for breast cancer surgery. J Oncol Pract. 2019; 15: e666 ‐ e676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOffodile AC II, Asaad M, Boukovalas S, et al. Financial toxicity following surgical treatment for breast cancer: a cross‐sectional pilot study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 2451 ‐ 2462.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanesh Kumar N, Berlin NL, Hawley ST, Jagsi R, Momoh AO. Financial toxicity in breast reconstruction: a national survey of women who have undergone breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. Published online September 3, 2021. doi: 10.1245/s10434‐021‐10708‐5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriese CR, Harrison JM, Janz NK, et al. Treatment‐associated toxicities reported by patients with early‐stage invasive breast cancer. Cancer. 2017; 123: 1925 ‐ 1934.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDillman DA, Smyth J, Christian LM. Internet, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler FJ. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation (Applied Social Research Methods). Sage Publications; 1995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz SJ, Lantz PM, Paredes Y, et al. Breast cancer treatment experiences of Latinas in Los Angeles County. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 2225 ‐ 2230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 1337 ‐ 1347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZikmund‐Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27: 663 ‐ 671.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Sage Publications; 2005.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawless RM, Littwin AK, Porter KM, Pottow JAE, Thorne DK, Warren E. Did bankruptcy reform fail? An empirical study of consumer debtors. Am Bankruptcy Law J. 2008; 82: 349 ‐ 406.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJagsi R, Pottow JA, Griffith KA, et al. Long‐term financial burden of breast cancer: experiences of a diverse cohort of survivors identified through population‐based registries. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 1269 ‐ 1276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTechnical Paper 63RV: Design and Methodology. US Census Bureau; 2002.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsaad M, Boukovalas S, Chu CK, et al. Financial toxicity and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: an analysis using propensity score methods. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020; 183: 649 ‐ 659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOffodile AC II, Hwang ES, Greenup RA. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the era of financial toxicity: an additional point for concern? Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 817 ‐ 818.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeropol NJ, Schrag D, Smith TJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 3868 ‐ 3874.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey CM, Selber J, Liu J, Lee CN, Offodile AC II. Current practice and perceptions regarding cost communication in breast cancer reconstruction: survey results of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 376 ‐ 385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheckter CC, Aliu O, Bailey C, et al. Exploring provider‐ and practice‐level drivers of cost‐consciousness in breast cancer reconstruction—secondary analysis of a survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 187: 569 ‐ 576.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSloan CE, Ubel PA. The 7 habits of highly effective cost‐of‐care conversations. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170 ( suppl ): S33 ‐ S35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenrikson NB, Banegas MP, Tuzzio L, et al. Workflow requirements for cost‐of‐care conversations in outpatient settings providing oncology or primary care: a qualitative, human‐centered design study. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170 ( suppl ): S70 ‐ S78.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePisu M, Schoenberger YM, Herbey I, et al. Perspectives on conversations about costs of cancer care of breast cancer survivors and cancer center staff: a qualitative study. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170 ( suppl ): S54 ‐ S61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLane W, Phillips BT, Offodile AC II. Where advocacy meets patient‐centered care‐cost considerations in breast reconstruction decision‐making. Gland Surg. 2021; 10: 507 ‐ 511.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker‐Seeley RD, Yabroff KR. Minimizing the “financial toxicity” associated with cancer care: advancing the research agenda. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 108: djv410.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoriates C, Shah NT, Arora VM. First, do no (financial) harm. JAMA. 2013; 310: 577 ‐ 578. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.7516
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen RA, Martinez ME & Zammitti EP Health insurance coverage: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January‐March 2016. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published September 2016. Accessed April 12, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/insur201609.pdf
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltomare I, Irwin B, Zafar SY, et al. Physician experience and attitudes toward addressing the cost of cancer care. J Oncol Pract. 2016; 12: e281 ‐ e288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenup RA, Rushing CN, Fish LJ, et al. Perspectives on the costs of cancer care: a survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26: 3141 ‐ 3151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnicow K, Patel MR, McLeod MC, Katz SJ, Jagsi R. Physician attitudes about cost consciousness for breast cancer treatment: differences by cancer sub‐specialty. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 173: 31 ‐ 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, et al. Patient‐reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 2499 ‐ 2506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long‐term patient‐reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 891 ‐ 899.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, et al. Long‐term patient‐reported outcomes following postmastectomy breast reconstruction: an 8‐year examination of 3268 patients. Ann Surg. 2019; 270: 473 ‐ 483.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer JP, Fox JP, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM. A longitudinal assessment of outcomes and healthcare resource utilization after immediate breast reconstruction—comparing implant‐ and autologous‐based breast reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015; 262: 692 ‐ 699.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSorkin M, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction: a multicenter assessment of risks and benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 1091 ‐ 1100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerlin NL, Chung KC, Matros E, Chen JS, Momoh AO. The costs of breast reconstruction and implications for episode‐based bundled payment models. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 721e ‐ 730e.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr34048_am.pdf
Size:
247.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr34048.pdf
Size:
155.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.