Performance of a deep learning‐based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness

Abstract

PurposeDeep learning (DL) is rapidly finding applications in low‐dose CT image denoising. While having the potential to improve the image quality (IQ) over the filtered back projection method (FBP) and produce images quickly, performance generalizability of the data‐driven DL methods is not fully understood yet. The main purpose of this work is to investigate the performance generalizability of a low‐dose CT image denoising neural network in data acquired under different scan conditions, particularly relating to these three parameters: reconstruction kernel, slice thickness, and dose (noise) level. A secondary goal is to identify any underlying data property associated with the CT scan settings that might help predict the generalizability of the denoising network.MethodsWe select the residual encoder–decoder convolutional neural network (REDCNN) as an example of a low‐dose CT image denoising technique in this work. To study how the network generalizes on the three imaging parameters, we grouped the CT volumes in the Low‐Dose Grand Challenge (LDGC) data into three pairs of training datasets according to their imaging parameters, changing only one parameter in each pair. We trained REDCNN with them to obtain six denoising models. We test each denoising model on datasets of matching and mismatching parameters with respect to its training sets regarding dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness, respectively, to evaluate the denoising performance changes. Denoising performances are evaluated on patient scans, simulated phantom scans, and physical phantom scans using IQ metrics including mean‐squared error (MSE), contrast‐dependent modulation transfer function (MTF), pixel‐level noise power spectrum (pNPS), and low‐contrast lesion detectability (LCD).ResultsREDCNN had larger MSE when the testing data were different from the training data in reconstruction kernel, but no significant MSE difference when varying slice thickness in the testing data. REDCNN trained with quarter‐dose data had slightly worse MSE in denoising higher‐dose images than that trained with mixed‐dose data (17%–80%). The MTF tests showed that REDCNN trained with the two reconstruction kernels and slice thicknesses yielded images of similar image resolution. However, REDCNN trained with mixed‐dose data preserved the low‐contrast resolution better compared to REDCNN trained with quarter‐dose data. In the pNPS test, it was found that REDCNN trained with smooth‐kernel data could not remove high‐frequency noise in the test data of sharp kernel, possibly because the lack of high‐frequency noise in the smooth‐kernel data limited the ability of the trained model in removing high‐frequency noise. Finally, in the LCD test, REDCNN improved the lesion detectability over the original FBP images regardless of whether the training and testing data had matching reconstruction kernels.ConclusionsREDCNN is observed to be poorly generalizable between reconstruction kernels, more robust in denoising data of arbitrary dose levels when trained with mixed‐dose data, and not highly sensitive to slice thickness. It is known that reconstruction kernel affects the in‐plane pNPS shape of a CT image, whereas slice thickness and dose level do not, so it is possible that the generalizability performance of this CT image denoising network highly correlates to the pNPS similarity between the testing and training data.