Analysis of the Field Effectiveness of General Motors Model Year 2013-2020 Advanced Driver Assistance System Features
dc.contributor.author | Leslie, Andrew J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kiefer, Raymond J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Flannagan, Carol A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Owen, Susan H. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Schoettle, Brandon A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-17T18:10:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-03 | |
dc.identifier | UMTRI-2022-02 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | GAC 3363 PO 4301135922 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171916 | |
dc.description | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Over 10.9 million Model Year 2013–2020 vehicles were matched to police-reported crashes from 14 states to examine the effectiveness of GM ADAS features. The quasi-induced exposure method was used, with logistic regression used to adjust for 13 covariates. Results indicated fusion/radar Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB), camera AEB, and Forward Collision Alert systems reduced rear-end striking crashes by 45%, 40%, and 20%, respectively. When restricting to crashes with suspected minor or higher injury severities reported, reductions were elevated to 58%, 55%, and 25%, respectively, providing evidence of additional crash mitigation benefits. Similarly, the Lane Keep Assist with Lane Departure Warning system provided 17% and 10% reductions in roadway departure and same direction sideswipe crashes, respectively, with corresponding injury reduction benefits elevating to 21% and 16%, respectively. The Lane Change Alert with Side Blind Zone Alert system reduced lane change crashes by 16%. Reverse Automatic Braking (which includes Rear Cross Traffic Alert, Rear Park Assist, and Rear Vision Camera) produced an 83% reduction in backing crashes. Front Pedestrian Braking reduced front pedestrian crashes by 23%. IntelliBeam (auto high beam headlighting) provided a 22% reduction in a combined set of (unlighted) nighttime animal, pedestrian, and bicyclist crashes. These results provide further evidence of widespread ADAS field benefits, as well as identify opportunities for moving closer toward a zero crashes vision. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | General Motors LLC | en_US |
dc.format | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.publisher | UMTRI | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject.other | advanced driver assistance system | en_US |
dc.subject.other | ADAS | en_US |
dc.subject.other | active safety | en_US |
dc.subject.other | crash avoidance | en_US |
dc.title | Analysis of the Field Effectiveness of General Motors Model Year 2013-2020 Advanced Driver Assistance System Features | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Transportation | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Engineering | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute | |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171916/1/UMTRI-2022-2.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4217 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of UMTRI-2022-2.pdf : Technical Report | |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/4217 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.