Show simple item record

Analysis of the Field Effectiveness of General Motors Model Year 2013-2020 Advanced Driver Assistance System Features

dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Andrew J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKiefer, Raymond J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFlannagan, Carol A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOwen, Susan H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoettle, Brandon A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-17T18:10:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.identifierUMTRI-2022-02en_US
dc.identifier.otherGAC 3363 PO 4301135922en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171916
dc.descriptionTechnical Reporten_US
dc.description.abstractOver 10.9 million Model Year 2013–2020 vehicles were matched to police-reported crashes from 14 states to examine the effectiveness of GM ADAS features. The quasi-induced exposure method was used, with logistic regression used to adjust for 13 covariates. Results indicated fusion/radar Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB), camera AEB, and Forward Collision Alert systems reduced rear-end striking crashes by 45%, 40%, and 20%, respectively. When restricting to crashes with suspected minor or higher injury severities reported, reductions were elevated to 58%, 55%, and 25%, respectively, providing evidence of additional crash mitigation benefits. Similarly, the Lane Keep Assist with Lane Departure Warning system provided 17% and 10% reductions in roadway departure and same direction sideswipe crashes, respectively, with corresponding injury reduction benefits elevating to 21% and 16%, respectively. The Lane Change Alert with Side Blind Zone Alert system reduced lane change crashes by 16%. Reverse Automatic Braking (which includes Rear Cross Traffic Alert, Rear Park Assist, and Rear Vision Camera) produced an 83% reduction in backing crashes. Front Pedestrian Braking reduced front pedestrian crashes by 23%. IntelliBeam (auto high beam headlighting) provided a 22% reduction in a combined set of (unlighted) nighttime animal, pedestrian, and bicyclist crashes. These results provide further evidence of widespread ADAS field benefits, as well as identify opportunities for moving closer toward a zero crashes vision.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGeneral Motors LLCen_US
dc.formatTechnical Reporten_US
dc.publisherUMTRIen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.otheradvanced driver assistance systemen_US
dc.subject.otherADASen_US
dc.subject.otheractive safetyen_US
dc.subject.othercrash avoidanceen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the Field Effectiveness of General Motors Model Year 2013-2020 Advanced Driver Assistance System Featuresen_US
dc.typeTechnical Report
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Transportation Research Institute
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171916/1/UMTRI-2022-2.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4217
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of UMTRI-2022-2.pdf : Technical Report
dc.working.doi10.7302/4217en_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.