Show simple item record

Patterns of caregiver aggressive and nonaggressive discipline toward young children in low- and middle- income countries: A latent class approach

dc.contributor.authorWard, Kaitlin
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shawna
dc.contributor.authorGrogan-Kaylor, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorPace, Garrett
dc.contributor.authorMa, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-31T00:02:30Z
dc.date.available2022-03-31T00:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWard, K.P., Lee, S.J., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Ma, J., & Pace, G.T. (2022). Patterns of caregiver aggressive and nonaggressive discipline toward young children in low- and middle- income countries: A latent class approach. Child Abuse & Neglect, 128, 105606.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171947en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Caregivers use a variety of disciplinary methods to respond to undesired child behavior. Many caregivers use nonaggressive forms of discipline, such as verbal reasoning and redirection. Some caregivers use aggressive forms of discipline, such as spanking and yelling. However, most caregivers use a combination of aggressive and nonaggressive discipline. To date, a disproportionately small number of caregiver discipline studies are conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and few studies in low-resource contexts examine aggressive and nonaggressive behaviors simultaneously. Objective: This study aims to elucidate caregiver patterns of 11 disciplinary behaviors used in LMICs, and examine how these patterns relate to child outcomes and household characteristics. Participants and setting: Data came from the fourth and fifth rounds of UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) distributed between 2009 and 2017 (N = 218,824 respondents across 63 countries). Focal children were 3–4 years old. Methods: Patterns of disciplinary behaviors were estimated using a multilevel latent class analysis (LCA). Multinomial regression analyses examined associations of disciplinary patterns with caregiver-reported child outcomes and household characteristics. Results: The LCA suggested caregiver discipline fell into three overall patterns: high behavioral control, moderate behavior control, and lower behavioral control. The lower behavioral control class was associated with the most advantageous child outcomes and household socio-demographic characteristics, whereas the high behavioral control class was associated with the most disadvan-tageous child outcomes and household characteristics. Conclusions: Efforts should be employed to reduce aggressive behaviors and promote positive parenting among caregivers in LMICs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectParenting, UNICEF, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, MICS, Caregiver aggression, Non-aggressive discipline, Positive parenting, spank, Physical punishmenten_US
dc.titlePatterns of caregiver aggressive and nonaggressive discipline toward young children in low- and middle- income countries: A latent class approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Social Worken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171947/1/2022-Ward-LCA Patterns of Caregiving discipline.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105606
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4248
dc.identifier.sourceChild Abuse & Neglecten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0562-2856en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 2022-Ward-LCA Patterns of Caregiving discipline.pdf : main article
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidLee, Shawna; 0000-0003-0562-2856en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/4248en_US
dc.owningcollnameSocial Work, School of (SSW)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.