Integration of social media with targeted emails and in-person outreach for exception from informed consent community consultation
dc.contributor.author | Hsu, Cindy H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Fowler, Jennifer | |
dc.contributor.author | Cranford, James A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, Michael P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Neumar, Robert W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-08T18:01:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-08 14:01:49 | en |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-08T18:01:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hsu, Cindy H.; Fowler, Jennifer; Cranford, James A.; Thomas, Michael P.; Neumar, Robert W. (2022). "Integration of social media with targeted emails and in-person outreach for exception from informed consent community consultation." Academic Emergency Medicine (2): 217-227. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-2712 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171974 | |
dc.description.abstract | BackgroundException from informed consent (EFIC) enables the enrollment of research subjects with emergent conditions to clinical trials without prior consent. EFIC study approval requires community consultation and public disclosure. We hypothesized that the integration of social media with targeted emails and in-person outreach is an effective community consultation strategy.MethodsWe utilized social media with targeted emails and in-person outreach for the community consultation of the ACCESS cardiac arrest trial. Study advertisements were disseminated using Facebook and Instagram, and targeted emails were sent to emergency medicine, prehospital, and cardiology providers. We also interviewed at-risk individuals with cardiac conditions, their caretakers, and patient advocacy groups. Participants were asked to complete a survey about their opinions about the study.ResultsWe collected 559 surveys over an 8-week period, and 70.5% of the surveys were obtained using social media. The median (IQR) age of survey respondents was 44 (33-57) years; 89.9% were White and 60.1% were women. A total of 91.3% believed ACCESS was an important study. Compared to the in-person group, more from social media (81.8% vs. 63.3%, p < 0.05) and targeted email (77.4% vs. 63.3%, p < 0.05) groups said they would include their loved ones in the study. More from the in-person group believed that their opinion would be considered seriously compared to the social media (75.9% vs. 62.6%, p < 0.05) and targeted email (75.9% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.05) groups. The incorporation of social media and targeted emails for community consultation reduced the cost per survey by fourfold compared to an in-person–only strategy.ConclusionsThe integration of social media with targeted emails and in-person outreach was a feasible and cost-saving approach for EFIC community consultation. Future work is necessary to determine the perception and best utilization of social media for community consultation. | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | targeted interviews | |
dc.subject.other | exception from informed consent | |
dc.subject.other | social media | |
dc.subject.other | cardiac arrest | |
dc.subject.other | community consultation | |
dc.subject.other | ||
dc.title | Integration of social media with targeted emails and in-person outreach for exception from informed consent community consultation | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171974/1/acem14377_am.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171974/2/acem14377.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/acem.14377 | |
dc.identifier.source | Academic Emergency Medicine | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Biros MH, Sargent C, Miller K. Community attitudes towards emergency research and exception from informed consent. Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 1382 - 1387. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hsieh M, Dailey MW, Callaway CW. Surrogate consent by family members for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest research. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 851 - 853. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sava J, Ciesla D, Williams M, Street J 3rd, White P, Wang D. Is informed consent in trauma a lost cause? A prospective evaluation of acutely injured patients’ ability to give consent. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 405 - 408. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Office of the Secretary. Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research; final rules. 21 CFR part 50.24. 1996: 51497 - 51531. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tisherman SA. Defining “community” and “consultation” for emergency research that requires an exception from informed consent. AMA J Ethics. 2018; 20: 467 - 474. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tisherman SA, Powell JL, Schmidt TA, et al. Regulatory challenges for the resuscitation outcomes consortium. Circulation. 2008; 118: 1585 - 1592. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Feldman WB, Hey SP, Franklin JM, Kesselheim AS. Public approval of exception from informed consent in emergency clinical trials: a systematic review of community consultation surveys. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2: e197591. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bulger EM, Schmidt TA, Cook AJ, et al. The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent. Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 53 ( 3 ): 341 – 350.e2. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holsti M, Zemek R, Baren J, et al. Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered “exception from informed consent” trial. Clin Trials. 2015; 12: 67 - 76. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Matchett G, Ryan TJ, Sunna MC, Lee SC, Pepe PE; EvK Clinical Trial Group. Measuring the cost and effect of current community consultation and public disclosure techniques in emergency care research. Resuscitation. 2018; 128: 37 - 42. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carlson JN, Zive D, Griffiths D, et al. Variations in the application of exception from informed consent in a multicenter clinical trial. Resuscitation. 2019; 135: 1 - 5. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Quick Facts - Washtenaw County, Michigan. United States Census Bureau. 2019. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/washtenawcountymichigan | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Quick Facts - Livingston County, Michigan. U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/livingstoncountymichigan | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chauhan S. Facebook reveals it can track users location even if they turn off location services. Tech Radar; 2019. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hsu CH, Meurer WJ, Domeier R, et al. Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (EROCA): results of a randomized feasibility trial of expedited out-of-hospital transport. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 78: 92 - 101. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Campbell I. Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Stat Med. 2007; 26: 3661 - 3675. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hsu CH, Meurer WJ, Domeier R, et al. Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (EROCA): results of a randomized feasibility trial of expedited out-of-hospital transport. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 78 ( 1 ): 92 - 101. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eubank L, Lee KS, Seder DB, et al. Approaches to community consultation in exception from informed consent: analysis of scope, efficiency, and cost at two centers. Resuscitation. 2018; 130: 81 - 87. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Harvin JA, Podbielski JM, Vincent LE, et al. Impact of social media on community consultation in exception from informed consent clinical trials. J Surg Res. 2019; 234: 65 - 71. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stephens SW, Williams C, Gray R, Kerby JD, Wang HE. Preliminary experience with social media for community consultation and public disclosure in exception from informed consent trials. Circulation. 2013; 128: 267 - 270. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stephens SW, Williams C, Gray R, Kerby JD, Wang HE, Bosarge PL. Using social media for community consultation and public disclosure in exception from informed consent trials. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80: 1005 - 1009. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dickert N, Sugarman J. Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 1123 - 1127. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Social Media Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center. 2021. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Galbraith KL. Practical and ethical considerations for using social media in community consultation and public disclosure activities. Acad Emerg Med. 2014; 21: 1151 - 1157. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | 20 Facebook stats to guide your 2021 Facebook strategy. Sprout Social. 2021. Accessed March 1, 2021. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/facebook-stats-for-marketers/#general)https://www.statista.com/topics/751/facebook/ | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | CARES Summary Report, Demographic and Survival Characteristics of OHCA. CARES Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival; April 15, 2020. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chao GF, Li KY, Zhu Z, et al. Use of telehealth by surgical specialties during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Surg. 2021; 156 ( 7 ): 620. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dutton RP, Stansbury LG, Hemlock B, Hess JR, Scalea TM. Impediments to obtaining informed consent for clinical research in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2008; 64: 1106 - 1112. | |
dc.working.doi | NO | en |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.