View Item 

Show simple item record

Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States
dc.contributor.authorSahar, Liora
dc.contributor.authorDouangchai Wills, Vanhvilai L.
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ka Kit (Antonio)
dc.contributor.authorFedewa, Stacey A.
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorKazerooni, Ella A.
dc.contributor.authorDyer, Debra S.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Robert A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T18:06:44Z
dc.date.available2023-05-08 14:06:43en
dc.date.available2022-04-08T18:06:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-15
dc.identifier.citationSahar, Liora; Douangchai Wills, Vanhvilai L.; Liu, Ka Kit (Antonio); Fedewa, Stacey A.; Rosenthal, Lauren; Kazerooni, Ella A.; Dyer, Debra S.; Smith, Robert A. (2022). "Geographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States." Cancer (8): 1584-1594.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/172070
dc.publisherAmerican Cancer Society
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheraccess to screening
dc.subject.othergeographic information system (GIS)
dc.subject.otherlung cancer
dc.subject.otherrural‐urban
dc.titleGeographic access to lung cancer screening among eligible adults living in rural and urban environments in the United States
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/172070/1/cncr33996.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/172070/2/cncr33996_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.33996
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 1149 ‐ 1155.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoyer VA; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160: 330 ‐ 338. Medline:24378917. doi: 10.7326/M13‐2771
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScreening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) (CAG‐00439N): decision summary. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Published February 2015. Accessed December 28, 2018. https://www.cms.gov/medicare‐coverage‐database/details/nca‐decision‐memo.aspx?NCAId=274#Top
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLung cancer screening registries. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Published 2016. Updated January 5, 2016. Accessed December 27, 2018. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare‐General‐Information/MedicareApprovedFacilitie/Lung‐Cancer‐Screening‐Registries.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for lung cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021; 325: 962 ‐ 970.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemal A, Fedewa SA. Lung cancer screening with low‐dose computed tomography in the United States—2010 to 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 1278 ‐ 1281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZahnd WE, Eberth JM. Lung cancer screening utilization: a behavioral risk factor surveillance system analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57: 250 ‐ 255.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFedewa SA, Kazerooni EA, Studts JL, et al. State variation in low‐dose CT scanning for lung cancer screening in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020; 113: 1044 ‐ 1052. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa170
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahar L, Wills VLD, Liu KK, Kazerooni EA, Dyer DS, Smith RAC. Using geospatial analysis to evaluate access to lung cancer screening in the United States. Chest. 2021; 159: 833 ‐ 844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharkhchi P, Kolenic GE, Carlos RC. Access to lung cancer screening services: preliminary analysis of geographic service distribution using the ACR Lung Cancer Screening Registry. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1388 ‐ 1395.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEberth JM, Bozorgi P, Lebrón LM, et al. Geographic availability of low‐dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in the United States, 2017. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15: E119.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeipins LA, Graham S, Young R, et al. Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area. J Community Health. 2011; 36: 675 ‐ 683.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang B, Dignan M, Han D, Johnson O. Does distance matter? Distance to mammography facilities and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Kentucky. J Rural Health. 2009; 25: 366 ‐ 371.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYe H, Kim H. Measuring spatial health disparity using a network‐based accessibility index method in a GIS environment: a case study of Hillsborough County, Florida. Int J Geospatial Environ Res. 2014; 1: 2. Accessed May 1, 2020. https://dc.uwm.edu/ijger/vol1/iss1/2/?utm_source=dc.uwm.edu%2Fijger%2Fvol1%2Fiss1%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoscoe FP, Henry KA, Zdeb MS. A nationwide comparison of driving distance versus straight‐line distance to hospitals. Prof Geogr. 2012; 64. doi: 10.1080/00330124.00332011.00583586
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAge and sex. US Census Bureau. Published 2018. Accessed July 16, 2020. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=S0101&tid=ACSST5Y2018.S0101
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahar L, Williams R, Rao A, Alcaraz KI, Portier KM. Using GIS technology to define and assess a rurality scheme suitable for decision support in health and patient services. Int J Appl Geospatial Res. 2018; 9: 1 ‐ 17. doi: 10.4018/IJAGR.2018070101
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYaghjyan L, Cogle CR, Deng G, et al. Continuous rural‐urban coding for cancer disparity studies: is it appropriate for statistical analysis? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 1076.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDouthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015; 129: 611 ‐ 620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingh GK, Williams SD, Siahpush M, Mulhollen A. Socioeconomic, rural‐urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: part I—all cancers and lung cancer and part II—colorectal, prostate, breast, and cervical cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011; 2011: 107497.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLam O, Broderick B & Toor S. How far Americans live from the closest hospital differs by community type. Pew Research Center. Published December 12, 2018. Accessed Jan 15, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact‐tank/2018/12/12/how‐far‐americans‐live‐from‐the‐closest‐hospital‐differs‐by‐community‐type/
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDelineation files. US Office of Management and Budget. Published 2020. Accessed August 6, 2020. https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference‐files/time‐series/demo/metro‐micro/delineation‐files.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRural‐urban commuting area codes. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Published 2019. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data‐products/rural‐urban‐commuting‐area‐codes.aspx
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCounty health rankings & roadmaps: learn more about adult smoking. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. Published 2018. Accessed July 28, 2020. https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/explore‐health‐rankings/measures‐data‐sources/county‐health‐rankings‐model/health‐factors/health‐behaviors/tobacco‐use/adult‐smoking
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohatgi KW, Marx CM, Lewis‐Thames MW, Liu J, Colditz GA, James AS. Urban‐rural disparities in access to low‐dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in Missouri and Illinois. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020; 17: E140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZgodic A, Zahnd WE, Advani S, Eberth JM. Low‐dose CT lung cancer screening uptake: a rural‐urban comparison. J Rural Health. Published online March 18, 2021. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12568
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOdahowski CL, Zahnd WE, Eberth JM. Challenges and opportunities for lung cancer screening in rural America. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16 ( pt B ): 590 ‐ 595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiffelbein JE, Carluzzo KL, Hasson RM, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and suggested interventions for lung cancer screening among a rural screening‐eligible population. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020; 11: 2150132720930544
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70: 7 ‐ 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. American Cancer Society; 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtkins GT, Kim T, Munson J. Residence in rural areas of the United States and lung cancer mortality. Disease incidence, treatment disparities, and stage‐specific survival. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017; 14: 403 ‐ 411.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung‐cancer mortality with low‐dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 395 ‐ 409.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr33996.pdf
Size:
1.081MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr33996_am.pdf
Size:
892.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.