Show simple item record

Proposal of 0.5 mg of protein/100 g of processed food as threshold for voluntary declaration of food allergen traces in processed food—A first step in an initiative to better inform patients and avoid fatal allergic reactions: A GA²LEN position paper

dc.contributor.authorZuberbier, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorDörr, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorAberer, Werner
dc.contributor.authorAlvaro, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorAngier, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorArasi, Stefania
dc.contributor.authorArshad, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorBallmer-Weber, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorBartra, Joan
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorBégin, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorBindslev-Jensen, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorBislimovska, Jovanka
dc.contributor.authorBousquet, Jean
dc.contributor.authorBrockow, Knut
dc.contributor.authorBush, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorCianferoni, Antonella
dc.contributor.authorCork, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorCustovic, Adnan
dc.contributor.authorDarsow, Ulf
dc.contributor.authorJong, Nicolette
dc.contributor.authorDeleanu, Diana
dc.contributor.authorDel Giacco, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorDeschildre, Antoine
dc.contributor.authorDunn Galvin, Audrey
dc.contributor.authorEbisawa, Motohiro
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Rivas, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Marta
dc.contributor.authorFiocchi, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorGerth van Wijk, Roy
dc.contributor.authorGotua, Maia
dc.contributor.authorGrimshaw, Kate
dc.contributor.authorGrünhagen, Josefine
dc.contributor.authorHeffler, Enrico
dc.contributor.authorHide, Michihiro
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin
dc.contributor.authorIncorvaia, Cristoforo
dc.contributor.authorJanson, Christer
dc.contributor.authorMalte John, Swen
dc.contributor.authorJones, Carla
dc.contributor.authorJutel, Marek
dc.contributor.authorKatoh, Norito
dc.contributor.authorKendziora, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorKinaciyan, Tamar
dc.contributor.authorKnol, Edward
dc.contributor.authorKurbacheva, Oksana
dc.contributor.authorLau, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorLoh, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLombardi, Carlo
dc.contributor.authorMäkelä, Mika
dc.contributor.authorMarchisotto, Mary Jane
dc.contributor.authorMakris, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMaurer, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Rosan
dc.contributor.authorMijakoski, Dragan
dc.contributor.authorMinov, Jordan
dc.contributor.authorMullol, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorNowak–wegrzyn, Anna
dc.contributor.authorNwaru, Bright I.
dc.contributor.authorOdemyr, Mikela
dc.contributor.authorPajno, Giovanni Battista
dc.contributor.authorPaudel, Sushil
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
dc.contributor.authorRenz, Harald
dc.contributor.authorRicci, Giampaolo
dc.contributor.authorRing, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorRogala, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorSampson, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorSenna, Gianenrico
dc.contributor.authorSitkauskiene, Brigita
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Peter Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorStevanovic, Katarina
dc.contributor.authorStoleski, Sasho
dc.contributor.authorSzajewska, Hania
dc.contributor.authorTanaka, Akio
dc.contributor.authorTodo-Bom, Ana
dc.contributor.authorTopal, Fatih Alexander
dc.contributor.authorValovirta, Erkka
dc.contributor.authorVan Ree, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorVenter, Carina
dc.contributor.authorWöhrl, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorWong, Gary W.K.
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Zuotao
dc.contributor.authorWorm, Margitta
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-01T20:28:44Z
dc.date.available2023-07-01 16:28:42en
dc.date.available2022-06-01T20:28:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.citationZuberbier, Torsten; Dörr, Tamara ; Aberer, Werner; Alvaro, Montserrat; Angier, Elizabeth; Arasi, Stefania; Arshad, Hasan; Ballmer-Weber, Barbara ; Bartra, Joan; Beck, Lisa; Bégin, Philippe ; Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten ; Bislimovska, Jovanka; Bousquet, Jean; Brockow, Knut; Bush, Andrew; Cianferoni, Antonella; Cork, Michael J.; Custovic, Adnan; Darsow, Ulf; Jong, Nicolette; Deleanu, Diana; Del Giacco, Stefano; Deschildre, Antoine; Dunn Galvin, Audrey; Ebisawa, Motohiro; Fernández-Rivas, Montserrat ; Ferrer, Marta; Fiocchi, Alessandro; Gerth van Wijk, Roy; Gotua, Maia; Grimshaw, Kate; Grünhagen, Josefine ; Heffler, Enrico; Hide, Michihiro; Hoffmann-Sommergruber, Karin ; Incorvaia, Cristoforo; Janson, Christer; Malte John, Swen; Jones, Carla; Jutel, Marek; Katoh, Norito; Kendziora, Benjamin; Kinaciyan, Tamar; Knol, Edward; Kurbacheva, Oksana; Lau, Susanne; Loh, Richard; Lombardi, Carlo; Mäkelä, Mika ; Marchisotto, Mary Jane; Makris, Michael; Maurer, Marcus; Meyer, Rosan; Mijakoski, Dragan; Minov, Jordan; Mullol, Joaquim; Nilsson, Caroline; Nowak–wegrzyn, Anna ; Nwaru, Bright I.; Odemyr, Mikela; Pajno, Giovanni Battista; Paudel, Sushil; Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.; Renz, Harald; Ricci, Giampaolo; Ring, Johannes; Rogala, Barbara; Sampson, Hugh; Senna, Gianenrico; Sitkauskiene, Brigita; Smith, Peter Kenneth; Stevanovic, Katarina; Stoleski, Sasho; Szajewska, Hania; Tanaka, Akio; Todo-Bom, Ana ; Topal, Fatih Alexander; Valovirta, Erkka; Van Ree, Ronald; Venter, Carina; Wöhrl, Stefan ; Wong, Gary W.K.; Zhao, Zuotao; Worm, Margitta (2022). "Proposal of 0.5 mg of protein/100 g of processed food as threshold for voluntary declaration of food allergen traces in processed food- A first step in an initiative to better inform patients and avoid fatal allergic reactions: A GA²LEN position paper." Allergy (6): 1736-1750.
dc.identifier.issn0105-4538
dc.identifier.issn1398-9995
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/172805
dc.description.abstractBackgroundFood anaphylaxis is commonly elicited by unintentional ingestion of foods containing the allergen above the tolerance threshold level of the individual. While labeling the 14 main allergens used as ingredients in food products is mandatory in the EU, there is no legal definition of declaring potential contaminants. Precautionary allergen labeling such as “may contain traces of” is often used. However, this is unsatisfactory for consumers as they get no information if the contamination is below their personal threshold. In discussions with the food industry and technologists, it was suggested to use a voluntary declaration indicating that all declared contaminants are below a threshold of 0.5 mg protein per 100 g of food. This concentration is known to be below the threshold of most patients, and it can be technically guaranteed in most food production. However, it was also important to assess that in case of accidental ingestion of contaminants below this threshold by highly allergic patients, no fatal anaphylactic reaction could occur. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to assess whether a fatal reaction to 5mg of protein or less has been reported, assuming that a maximum portion size of 1kg of a processed food exceeds any meal and thus gives a sufficient safety margin.MethodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until 24 January 2021 for provocation studies and case reports in which one of the 14 major food allergens was reported to elicit fatal or life-threatening anaphylactic reactions and assessed if these occurred below the ingestion of 5mg of protein. A Delphi process was performed to obtain an expert consensus on the results.ResultsIn the 210 studies included, in our search, no reports of fatal anaphylactic reactions reported below 5 mg protein ingested were identified. However, in provocation studies and case reports, severe reactions below 5 mg were reported for the following allergens: eggs, fish, lupin, milk, nuts, peanuts, soy, and sesame seeds.ConclusionBased on the literature studied for this review, it can be stated that cross-contamination of the 14 major food allergens below 0.5 mg/100 g is likely not to endanger most food allergic patients when a standard portion of food is consumed. We propose to use the statement “this product contains the named allergens in the list of ingredients, it may contain traces of other contaminations (to be named, e.g. nut) at concentrations less than 0.5 mg per 100 g of this product” for a voluntary declaration on processed food packages. This level of avoidance of cross-contaminations can be achieved technically for most processed foods, and the statement would be a clear and helpful message to the consumers. However, it is clearly acknowledged that a voluntary declaration is only a first step to a legally binding solution. For this, further research on threshold levels is encouraged.
dc.publisherBundesinstitut für Risikobewertung
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othernutrition
dc.subject.otherfood allergy
dc.subject.otheranaphylaxis
dc.titleProposal of 0.5 mg of protein/100 g of processed food as threshold for voluntary declaration of food allergen traces in processed food—A first step in an initiative to better inform patients and avoid fatal allergic reactions: A GA²LEN position paper
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/172805/1/all15167.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/172805/2/all15167_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/all.15167
dc.identifier.sourceAllergy
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindvik H, Lødrup Carlsen KC, Mowinckel P, Navaratnam J, Borres MP, Carlsen K-H. Conjunctival provocation test in diagnosis of peanut allergy in children. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017; 47 ( 6 ): 785 - 794.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoza-Guedes P, González-Pérez R, Sánchez-Machín I, Matheu V. Long-term follow up in cow’s milk anaphylaxis after successful rush oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 1: AB106.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaiva M, et al. Successful oral rush desensitisation in two children with severe cow’s milk allergy. Allergy. 2009; 90: 487.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLisann L, Song Y, Wang J, Ehrlich P, Maitland A, Li X-M. Successful prevention of extremely frequent and severe food anaphylaxis in three children by combined traditional Chinese medicine therapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2014; 66 (no pagination)(66). 1 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaliotou NN, et al. Anaphylaxis with the manifestation of convulsions. Allergy. 2018; 73 ( suppl 105 ): 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSindher SB, DaVeiga SP. Acute anaphylaxis following fresh food skin prick testing with pine nuts. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015; 1: A6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoh G, Lee SS. A pilot study of interferon-gamma-induced specific oral tolerance induction (ISOTI) for immunoglobulin E-mediated anaphylactic food allergy. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009; 29 ( 10 ): 667 - 675.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoneret-Vautrin DA, et al. Food anaphylaxis in schools: evaluation of the management plan and the efficiency of the emergency kit. Allergy. 2001; 56 ( 11 ): 1071 - 1076.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorisset M, Moneret-Vautrin DA, Kanny G, et al. Thresholds of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut and sesame in immunoglobulin E-dependent allergies: evaluation by double-blind or single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenges. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003; 33 ( 8 ): 1046 - 1051.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoneret-Vautrin DA, Rance F, Kanny G, et al. Food allergy to peanuts in France–evaluation of 142 observations. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998; 28 ( 9 ): 1113 - 1119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobertson K, Kim H. Intentional poisoning with peanut as a cause of recurrent anaphylaxis. Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. Conference: Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Annual Scientific Meeting, 2017. 14 (Supplement 1).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDua S, Wagner A, Ewan PW. The role of tryptase and food challenge in diagnosing IgE negative sesame seed allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011; 41: 1822 - 1865.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHudes G, Friedman N, Rosenstreich D. Soy milk anaphylaxis in patients with negative soy specific ige and skin test: diagnostic challenge. Abstracts: Medically Challenging Cases Abstracts/Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019; 123. S64 – S142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbrahimi M, Gharagozlou M, Mohebbi A, et al. The efficacy of oral immunotherapy in patients with cow’s milk allergy. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017; 16 ( 3 ): 183 - 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSCo, F. Report of the scientific committee on food on the revision of essential requirements of infant formulae and follow-on formulae. 2003: In: DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ECHaCP, editor.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHourihane J, Knulst A. Thresholds of allergenic proteins in foods. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 207: S152 - S156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung DY, et al. New approaches for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Novartis Found Symp. 2004; 257: 248 - 260; discussion 260-4, 276-85.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevin ME, Motala C, Lopata AL. Anaphylaxis in a milk-allergic child after ingestion of soy formula cross-contaminated with cow’s milk protein. Pediatrics. 2005; 116 ( 5 ): 1223 - 1225.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYunginger JW, Sweeney KG, Sturner WQ, et al. Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis. J Am Med Assoc. 1988; 260 ( 10 ): 1450 - 1452.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzmi S, Simpson A, Chew F, Marinho S. Two cases of allergy to Lupin in vegan ice-cream. Allergy. 2019; 74: 489.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorm M, Francuzik W, Renaudin J-M, et al. Factors increasing the risk for a severe reaction in anaphylaxis: an analysis of data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry. Allergy. 2018; 73 ( 6 ): 1322 - 1330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarrs T, Lack G. Why do few food-allergic adolescents treat anaphylaxis with adrenaline?–Reviewing a pressing issue. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013; 24 ( 3 ): 222 - 229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSong TT, Worm M, Lieberman P. Anaphylaxis treatment: current barriers to adrenaline auto-injector use. Allergy. 2014; 69 ( 8 ): 983 - 991.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim JS, Sinacore JM, Pongracic JA. Parental use of EpiPen for children with food allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 116 ( 1 ): 164 - 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuberbier T, Edenharter G, Worm M, et al. Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in Germany - a population study. Allergy. 2004; 59 ( 3 ): 338 - 345.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBallmer-Weber BK, Fernandez-Rivas M, Beyer K, et al. How much is too much? Threshold dose distributions for 5 food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015; 135 ( 4 ): 964 - 971.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKothra A, Galani M, Xepapadaki P, et al. Oral food challenges to nuts in children with LTP sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019; 74 ( suppl 106 ): 506 - 507.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlviani C, Burrell S, Macleod A, et al. Anaphylaxis refractory to intramuscular adrenaline during in-hospital food challenges: a case series and proposed management. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020; 50 ( 12 ): 1400 - 1405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A, et al. Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the European Anaphylaxis Registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 137 ( 4 ): 1128 - 1137.e1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGruzelle V, Juchet A, Martin-Blondel A, Michelet M, Chabbert-Broue A, Didier A. Benefits of baked milk oral immunotherapy in French children with cow’s milk allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020; 31 ( 4 ): 364 - 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamura T, Okada Y, Maeda M, Kamiya T, Imai T. Oral food challenges using multiple-dose steps for cow’s milk allergy: safety and efficiency. Allergy. 2020; 75 ( suppl 109 ): 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRha J, Lanser P, Hauk P. A case of severe anaphylaxis to baked milk in a child on dupilumab. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020; 125 ( suppl 5 ): S102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuano FJ, Prieto-Moreno Pfeifer A, Torres I, et al. Experience with Omalizumab in patients with anaphylactic reactions to milk allergy. Allergy. 2019; 74:( S106 ): 356. –. http://doi.org/10.1111/all.13960
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSato S, et al. Underlying mechanisms of oral immunotherapy against hen’s egg and cow’s milk anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2011; 94): 397.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakahashi M, Taniuchi S, Soejima K, Hatano Y, Yamanouchi S, Kaneko K. Successful desensitization in a boy with severe cow’s milk allergy by a combination therapy using omalizumab and rush oral immunotherapy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2015; 11 ( 1 ): 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTejero Alcalde M, Rojas Perez-Ezquerra P, Fuentes AV. Cow’s milk desensitization in a 23-year-old man. Allergy. 2019; 74 ( S106 ): 802.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYanagida N, Utsunomiya T, Sato S, et al. Treatment of hen’s egg- and cow’s milk-induced anaphylaxis by rash oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010; 125: AB26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner PJ, Mehr S, Joshi P, et al. Safety of food challenges to extensively heated egg in egg-allergic children: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013; 24: 450 - 455.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePacharn P, et al. Wheat-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis in Thai children: a report of 5 cases. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2009; 27: 115 - 120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsaumi T, Yanagida N, Sato S, Shukuya A, Nishino M, Ebisawa M. Provocation tests for the diagnosis of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016; 27 ( 1 ): 44 - 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsukura S, Aihara M, Sugawara M, et al. Two cases of wheat-dependent anaphylaxis induced by aspirin administration but not by exercise. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010; 35 ( 3 ): 233 - 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsuo H, Morimoto K, Akaki T, et al. Exercise and aspirin increase levels of circulating gliadin peptides in patients with wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005; 35 ( 4 ): 461 - 466.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThongngarm T, Wongsa C, Pacharn P, Piboonpocanun S, Sompornrattanaphan M. Clinical characteristics and proposed wheat-cofactor challenge protocol with a high diagnostic yield in adult-onset IgE-mediated wheat allergy. J Asthma Allergy. 2020; 13: 355 - 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUeno R, Takaoka Y, Shimojo N, et al. A case of pediatric anaphylaxis caused by gummy tablets containing fish collagen. Asia Pac Allergy. 2020; 10 ( 4 ): e35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDereci S, Koca T, Akcam M. The incidence and clinical characteristics of IgE-mediated hazelnut allergy in children living in the eastern black sea region of Turkey. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2016; 29 ( 1 ): 24 - 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFink W, Capucilli P, Lewis MO, Rooney CB, Brown-Whitehorn TF. Significantly increased threshold dose after long-term peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy and daily oral peanut intake. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019; 123 ( suppl 5 ): S86 - S87.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOppenheimer JJ, et al. Treatment of penaut allergy with rush immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992; 90 ( 2 ): 256 - 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendez Reyes J, Pistiner M., P.M. Peanut induced anaphylaxis in an infant oral food challenge requiring two doses of epinephrine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019; 123 ( suppl 5 ): S126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Erp FC, et al. Can we predict severe reactions during peanut challenges in children? Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013; 24 ( 6 ): 596 - 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNagakura K, et al. Two year follow-up after rush oral immunotherapy for peanut-induced anaphylaxis. Allergy. 2015; 101: 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNagakura K-I, Sato S, Yanagida N, et al. Oral immunotherapy in Japanese children with anaphylactic peanut allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018; 175 ( 3 ): 181 - 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalari F, Bemanian MH, Fallahpour M, et al. Comparison of diagnostic tests with oral food challenge in a clinical trial for adult patients with sesame anaphylaxis. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020; 19 ( 1 ): 27 - 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoshihiro T, Matsui T, Suguira S, Ito K. Oral immunotherapy for 7 patients with sesame allergy. Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019; 74: 799.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInomata N, Osuna H, Kawano K, et al. Late-onset Anaphylaxis after Ingestion of Bacillus Subtilis-fermented Soybeans (Natto): clinical review of 7 patients. Allergol Int. 2007; 56: 257 - 261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang WH, Purchase ECR, Rivington RN. Positive skin tests and Prausnitz-Küstner reactions in metabisulfite-sensitive subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986; 78 ( 3 ): 443 - 449.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoike Y, Yanagida N, Sato S, et al. Predictors of persistent wheat allergy in children: a retrospective cohort study. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2018; 176: 1 - 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhisitbuntoon T, Jirapongsananuruk O, Pacharn P, et al. A potential role of gliadin extract skin prick test in IgE-mediated wheat allergy. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-291119-0703
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUtsunomiya T, Imai T, Ogura K, et al. Rush oral immunotherapy for wheat-induced anaphylaxis in Japan. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 1): AB26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRekabi M, Arshi S, Darougar S, et al. Oral wheat immunotherapy in a patient with anaphylaxis despite negative sensitization tests. Shiraz E-Med J. 2019; 20 ( 2 ): e83309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVichyanond P, Visitsuntorn N, Tuchinda M. Wheat-induced anaphylaxis. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 1990; 8 ( 1 ): 49 - 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerzinger T, Kick G, Ludolph-Hauser D, Przybilla B. Anaphylaxis to wheat beer. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004; 92 ( 6 ): 673 - 675.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber C, Kalicinsky C. A novel combination of an IgE mediated adult onset food allergy and a suspected mast cell activation syndrome presenting as anaphylaxis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2016; 12 ( 14 ) (no pagination)(46). 2 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee TK, Huntwork MP, Carlson JC. Too old for egg allergya case of anaphylaxis in the elderly. J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33 ( 2 suppl 1 ): 648.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiggemann B, Yurek S, Beyer K. Severe anaphylaxis requiring intensive care during oral food challenge-It is not always peanuts. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017; 28 ( 2 ): 201 - 203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMikos N, et al. Adult onset anaphylaxis to egg yolk. Allergy. 2012; 96: 381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirata J-I, Ohya M, Kumon K. Diagnosis and long-term management of hydrolyzed wheat protein wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Acute Med Surg. 2015; 2: 260 - 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuñoz FM, López Cazaña JM, Villas F, Contreras JF, Díaz JM, Ojeda JA. Exercise-induced anaphylactic reaction to hazelnut. Allergy. 1994; 49: 314 - 316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKham Murng SH, Egner W, Shrimpton A, Sargur RB. Using Omega-5 Gliadin (rTri a 19) in the diagnosis ofanaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 131 ( 2 ): AB214.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNardi M, Lin R-W. Food associated exercise induced anaphylaxis associated with late phase skin test reactivity to shrimp. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 ( 2 ): 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuksawat Y. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis in 17-year-old adolescent male. Allergy. 2018; 73 ( suppl 105 ): 789.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDongo LC, et al. Celery-dependent exercise induced anaphylaxis confirmed only by BAT. Allergy. 2014; 99: 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHameed O, Skibinska M. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis: A series of three cases. Br J Dermatol. 2012; 1: 150 - 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMobayed HM, Ali Al-Nesf M. Two cases of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis with different culprit foods. Ann Thorac Med. 2014; 9 ( 1 ): 42 - 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitten M, et al. Fish dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis after ingestion of a high dose of salmon. Allergy. 2014; 99: 278.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin HY, et al. Fish induced anaphylactic reaction: report of one case. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1998; 39 ( 3 ): 200 - 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMakatsori M, Cappella A, McKenzie R, Skypala I. Anaphylaxis- don’t forget lupin! Clin Transl Allergy. 2013; 3 ( suppl 3 ): P158.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoller L, La Vieille S, Chan ES. First reported case in Canada of anaphylaxis to lupine in a child with peanut allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018; 14 ( 64 ) (no pagination)(64). 1 – 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBito T, Kanda E, Tanaka M, Fukunaga A, Horikawa T, Nishigori C. Cows milk-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis under the condition of a premenstrual or ovulatory phase following skin sensitization. Allergol Int. 2008; 57 ( 4 ): 437 - 439.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahdah L, Ceccarelli S, Amendola S, et al. IgE Immunoadsorption knocks down the risk of food-related anaphylaxis. Pediatrics. 2015; 136 ( 6 ): e1617 - e1620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavid TJ. Anaphylactic shock during elimination diets for severe atopic eczema. Arch Dis Child. 1984; 59 ( 10 ): 983 - 986.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmeratunga R, Woon ST. Anaphylaxis to hyperallergenic functional foods. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2010; 6 ( 33 ) (no pagination)(33). 1 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDias JG, Costa AC, Pedro E, Barbosa MP. Specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) to cow’s milk in an adult patient with anaphylaxis symptoms. Allergy. 2011; 94): 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTripodi S, et al. Severe anaphylaxis to sheep’s milk cheese in a child desensitized to cow’s milk through specific oral tolerance induction. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 45 ( 2 ): 56 - 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazar I, Cavari Y, Levitas A, Mandolla AB, Broides A. Gastric drainage in the treatment of near-fatal food-induced anaphylaxis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017; 09: 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDias JG, Costa AC, Pedro E, Barbosa MP. Specific oral tolerance induction (SOTI) to cow’s milk in an adult patient with anaphylaxis symptoms. In Clinical and Translational Allergy. Conference: Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarguet C, Couderc L, Blanc T,. et al. Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: apropos of 44 patients aged 2 months to 15 years. Arch Pediatr. 1999; 1 ( suppl 6 ): 72S - 78S.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia Sifuentes L, et al. Life-threatening anaphylaxis in an adult patient monosensitised to almond: a case report. Allergy. 2009; 90: 365.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLai J, Campbell D. Always be prepared. Intern Med J. 2016; 46 ( suppl 4 ): 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoepke JW, et al. Anaphylaxis to pinon nuts. Ann Allergy. 1990; 65 ( 6 ): 473 - 476.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeysman M, Schelfaut D, Vincken W. A not so healthy muesli: a case report. Acta Clin Belg. 2009; 64 ( 4 ): 366 - 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarbarroja-Escudero J, et al. Severe allergic reaction to pine nut. Allergy. 2012; 96: 382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLall P, Lodi U. The deadly dessert: transfer of food allergy following lung transplantation from donor to recipient. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013; 1: A28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDehlink E, Bannert C, Eiwegger T, Diesner S, Gruber S, Szépfalusi Z. Omalizumab as successful treatment option in severe peanut allergy. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013; 3 ( S3 ): 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoucard T, Malmheden Yman I. A study on severe food reactions in Sweden–is soy protein an underestimated cause of food anaphylaxis? Allergy. 1999; 54 ( 3 ): 261 - 265.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhalid I, Zoratti E, Stagner L, Betensley AD, Nemeh H, Allenspach L. Transfer of peanut allergy from the donor to a lung transplant recipient. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008; 27 ( 10 ): 1162 - 1164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonsson-Razdan P, et al. A case of peanut induced anaphylaxis and the development ofa thoracolumbar syrinx. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011; 1: A24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindsley S, et al. Refractory anaphylaxis at food challenge treated with peripheral adrenaline infusion. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017; 47 ( 12 ): 1704.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChatain C, Pin I, Pralong P, Jacquier JP, Leccia MT. A severe anaphylactic reaction to peanut after a negative challenge test [French]. Rev Fr Allergol. 2016; 56 ( 2 ): 94 - 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKagi MK, Wuthrich B. Falafel burger anaphylaxis due to sesame seed allergy. Ann Allergy. 1993; 71 ( 2 ): 127 - 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD’Amelio CM, et al. Anaphylaxis due to sesame seed food allergy with negative skin prick tests: the hydrophilic fraction also matters. Allergy. 2015; 101: 490.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarrusca C, et al. Soy anaphylaxis in an infant: a case report. Allergy. 2014; 99: 386.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsero R, et al. Unusual allergy to soy appeared in adult age. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 48 ( 3 ): 94 - 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOjeda PM, Ojeda I, Rubio G. Anaphylaxis due to sulfite intolerance: a protective effect from cyanocobalamin. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013; 3 ( suppl 3 ): P15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFAO-WHO. Summary report of the Ad hoc Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Risk Assessment of Food Allergens. Part 2: Review and establish threshold levels in foods of the priority allergens. 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepper AN, Assa’ad A, Blaiss M, et al. Consensus report from the Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE) 2019 oral immunotherapy for food allergy summit. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020; 146 ( 2 ): 244 - 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren CM, Otto AK, Walkner MM, Gupta RS. Quality of life among food allergic patients and their caregivers. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016; 16 ( 5 ): 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarchisotto MJ,, Harada L, Kamdar O, et al. Food allergen labeling and purchasing habits in the United States and Canada. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017; 5 ( 2 ): 345 - 351.e2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShoji M, Adachi R, Akiyama H. Japanese food allergen labeling regulation: an update. J AOAC Int. 2018; 101 ( 1 ): 8 - 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeer M. Informationsschreiben Nr. 161: Allergenkennzeichnung von unbeabsichtigten Vermischungen (Art. 8 Abs. 3-5 der Verordnung über die Kennzeichnung und Anpreisung von Lebensmitteln, LKV) Stand: 18.04.2011, ersetzt die Version vom 17.12.2010, B.f.G. BAG, Editor. 2011, Bern.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichter K, Kramarz S, Niemann B, et al. Schwellenwerte zur Allergenkennzeichnung von Lebensmitteln, in Allergien: Bessere Information, höhere Lebensqualität, B.f. Risikobewertung, Editor. 2009, Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung: Berlin.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllergen Bureau VITAL® best practice labelling guide For Australia and New Zealand. 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRöder M, Weber W. VITAL – (“Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labelling“). 2020 [cited 2020 8th July 2020]; Available from: https://www.produktqualitaet.com/de/inspektionen/allergenmanagement/risikobewertung-vital.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBf R. “VITAL 3.0“: Neue und aktualisierte Vorschläge für Referenzdosen von Lebensmittelallergenen - Stellungnahme Nr. 015/2020 des BfR vom 9. März 2020. In: Risikobewertung Bf, editor., 2020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemington BC, Westerhout J, Meima MY, et al. Updated population minimal eliciting dose distributions for use in risk assessment of 14 priority food allergens. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020; 139: 111259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen KJ, Remington BC, Baumert JL, et al. Allergen reference doses for precautionary labeling (VITAL 2.0): clinical implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133 ( 1 ): 156 - 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllergen Bureau Summary of the 2019 VITAL Scientific Expert Panel Recommendations, A. Bureau, Editor. 2019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6 ( 7 ): e1000097.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTripodi S, et al. An anphylactic shock in a 11-year-old girl by hidden hens’ egg in mortadella (a large Italian sausage). Allergy. 2009; 90: 566.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLefevre S, Kanny G. Oral immunotherapy and omalizumab for food allergy. Allergy. 2016; 71 ( suppl 102 ): 269.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBansal AS, Sanghvi MM, Bansal RA, Hayman GR. Variably severe systemic allergic reactions after consuming foods with unlabelled lupin flour: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2014; 55 (no pagination)(55). 1 – 4.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.