View Item 

Show simple item record

Prevalence and risk indicators of midfacial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence at single site in the esthetic zone: A cross-sectional clinical and ultrasonographic study
dc.contributor.authorTavelli, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorBarootchi, Shayan
dc.contributor.authorMajzoub, Jad
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun-Liang
dc.contributor.authorStefanini, Martina
dc.contributor.authorZucchelli, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorKripfgans, Oliver D.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.contributor.authorUrban, Istvan A.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-05T21:00:11Z
dc.date.available2023-07-05 17:00:10en
dc.date.available2022-07-05T21:00:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.citationTavelli, Lorenzo; Barootchi, Shayan; Majzoub, Jad; Chan, Hsun-Liang ; Stefanini, Martina; Zucchelli, Giovanni; Kripfgans, Oliver D.; Wang, Hom-Lay ; Urban, Istvan A. (2022). "Prevalence and risk indicators of midfacial peri- implant soft tissue dehiscence at single site in the esthetic zone: A cross- sectional clinical and ultrasonographic study." Journal of Periodontology 93(6): 857-866.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/172942
dc.description.abstractBackgroundEsthetic complications of dental implants in the esthetic zone can have a major negative impact on patients’ quality of life and perception of implant therapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) and the clinical and ultrasonographic risk indicators for this condition.MethodsSubjects with ≥1 healthy single dental implants in the esthetic area were identified and recruited. Clinical and ultrasonographic measurements, including PSTD class and subclass, probing depth, keratinized mucosa width (KMW), mucosal thickness (MT) at 1 mm and 3 mm, buccal bone distance (BBD) and buccal bone thickness, were evaluated in healthy implants and implants with PSTD.ResultsA total of 153 subjects with a total of 176 dental implants were included. The prevalence of PSTD was 54.2% and 56.8% on a patient and implant level, respectively. The most frequent type of PSTD was the one characterized by having both an implant-supported crown longer than the clinical crown of the homologous tooth and a visible abutment/implant fixture exposed to the oral cavity. The multivariate analysis showed that the presence of an adjacent implant, a longer time of the implant in function, limited MT, reduced KMW, and increased BBD were significantly associated with the presence of PSTD.ConclusionsPSTDs are common findings in the esthetic region. Several risk indicators for this condition, such as presence of an adjacent implant, increased time in function of the implant, higher BBD, lower KMW, and MT were identified.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherdental implant
dc.subject.othergingival recession
dc.subject.otherimplant therapy
dc.subject.othersoft tissue
dc.subject.otherultrasonography
dc.titlePrevalence and risk indicators of midfacial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence at single site in the esthetic zone: A cross-sectional clinical and ultrasonographic study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/172942/1/jper10902_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/172942/2/jper10902.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/JPER.21-0402
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomandini M, Pedrinaci I, Lima C, Soldini MC, Araoz A, Sanz M. Prevalence and risk/protective indicators of buccal soft tissue dehiscence around dental implants. J Clin Periodontol 2021; 48: 455 - 463.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Majzoub J, et al. Ultrasonographic tissue perfusion analysis at implant and palatal donor sites following soft tissue augmentation: a clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2021; 48: 602 - 614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanz-Martin I, Regidor E, Navarro J, Sanz-Sanchez I, Sanz M, Ortiz-Vigon A. Factors associated with the presence of peri-implant buccal soft tissue dehiscences: A case-control study. J Periodontol. 2020; 91: 1003 – 1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0490
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonography for diagnosis of peri-implant diseases and conditions: a detailed scanning protocol and case demonstration. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020; 49 ( 7 ): 20190445.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Chan HL, Namazi SS, Wang HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31 ( 4 ): 352 - 359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Wang HL, Fowlkes JB, Giannobile WV, Kripfgans OD. Non-ionizing real-time ultrasonography in implant and oral surgery: a feasibility study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 341 - 347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Majzoub J, et al. Ultrasonographic tissue perfusion analysis at implant and palatal donor sites following soft tissue augmentation: a clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2021; 48 ( 4 ): 602 - 614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Tavelli L, Majzoub J, Chan HL, Wang HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonographic tissue perfusion in peri-implant health and disease. J Dent Res 2021:220345211035684. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211035684
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSassaroli E, Crake C, Scorza A, Kim DS, Park MA. Image quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging systems: advanced B-modes. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20: 115 - 124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTattan M, Sinjab K, Lee E, et al. Ultrasonography for chairside evaluation of periodontal structures: a pilot study. J Periodontol 2019; 91 ( 7 ): 890 - 899.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Sinjab K, Li J, Chen Z, Wang HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonography for noninvasive and real-time evaluation of peri-implant tissue dimensions. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45: 986 - 995.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkhardt R, Joss A, Lang NP. Soft tissue dehiscence coverage around endosseous implants: a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 451 - 457.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Mele M, Stefanini M, Montebugnoli L. A novel surgical-prosthetic approach for soft tissue dehiscence coverage around single implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 957 - 962.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazzotti C, Stefanini M, Felice P, Bentivogli V, Mounssif I, Zucchelli G. Soft-tissue dehiscence coverage at peri-implant sites. Periodontol 2000 2018; 77: 256 - 272.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStefanini M, Marzadori M, Tavelli L, Bellone P, Zucchelli G. Peri-implant papillae reconstruction at an esthetically failing implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020; 40: 213 - 222.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol 2018; 89 (Suppl 1 ): S304 - S312.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBianchini MA, Galarraga-Vinueza ME, Apaza-Bedoya K, De Souza JM, Magini R, Schwarz F. Two to six-year disease resolution and marginal bone stability rates of a modified resective-implantoplasty therapy in 32 peri-implantitis cases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2019; 21: 758 - 765.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2021; 92: 21 - 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParvini P, Galarraga-Vinueza ME, Obreja K, Magini RS, Sader R, Schwarz F. Prospective study assessing three-dimensional changes of mucosal healing following soft tissue augmentation using free gingival grafts. J Periodontol 2021; 92: 400 - 408.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 1755 - 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouso-Queiruga E, Tattan M, Ahmad U, Barwacz C, Gonzalez-Martin O, Avila-Ortiz G. Assessment of gingival thickness using digital file superimposition versus direct clinical measurements. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25: 2353 - 2361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Majzoub J, Siqueira R, Mendonca G, Wang HL. Volumetric changes at implant sites: a systematic appraisal of traditional methods and optical scanning-based digital technologies. J Clin Periodontol 2021; 48: 315 - 334.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandelaris GA, Scheyer ET, Evans M, et al. American academy of periodontology best evidence consensus statement on selected oral applications for cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol 2017; 88: 939 - 945.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Chappuis V, Monje F, et al. The critical peri-implant buccal bone wall thickness revisited: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34: 1328 - 1336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 119 - 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaes S, Eghbali A, Chappuis V, Raes F, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. A long-term prospective cohort study on immediately restored single tooth implants inserted in extraction sockets and healed ridges: CBCT analyses, soft tissue alterations, aesthetic ratings, and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018; 20: 522 - 530.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle CHF, Tarnow D. The etiology of hard- and soft-tissue deficiencies at dental implants: a narrative review. J Periodontol 2018; 89 (Suppl 1 ): S291 - S303.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvila-Ortiz G, Gonzalez-Martin O, Couso-Queiruga E, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype. J Periodontol 2020; 91: 283 - 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMailoa J, Arnett M, Chan HL, George FM, Kaigler D, Wang HL. The association between buccal mucosa thickness and peri implant bone loss and attachment loss: a cross-sectional study. Implant Dent 2018; 27: 575 - 581.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 344 - 349.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol 2018; 45 (Suppl 20 ): S278 - S285.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol 2018; 89 (Suppl 1 ): S313 - S318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChackartchi T, Romanos GE, Sculean A. Soft tissue-related complications and management around dental implants. Periodontol 2000 2019; 81: 124 - 138.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang II, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33: 212 - 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Wang HL. Peri-implant diseases: current understanding and management. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 2021; 14: 263 - 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Ravida A, Tavelli L, Wang HL. Nonsurgical treatment for peri-implant mucositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 2020; 13: 123 - 139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, et al. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol 2020; 91: 9 - 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson LE, Inglehart MR, El-Kholy K, Eber R, Wang HL. Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 416 - 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucchelli G, Tavelli L, Stefanini M, et al. Classification of facial peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence/deficiencies at single implant sites in the esthetic zone. J Periodontol 2019; 90: 1116 - 1124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Surgical treatment of buccal soft tissue recessions around single implants: 1-year results from a prospective pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 641 - 646.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 303 - 310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 527 - 532.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFu JH, Su CY, Wang HL. Esthetic soft tissue management for teeth and implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2012; 12: 129 - 142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Tavelli L, Zucchelli G, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Gingival phenotype modification therapies on natural teeth: a network meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2020; 91: 1386 - 1399.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Tavelli L, Gianfilippo RD, et al. Acellular dermal matrix for root coverage procedures: 9-year assessment of treated isolated gingival recessions and their adjacent untreated sites. J Periodontol 2021; 92: 254 - 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarootchi S, Chan HL, Namazi SS, Wang HL, Kripfgans OD. Ultrasonographic characterization of lingual structures pertinent to oral, periodontal, and implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 352 - 359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiqueira R, Sinjab K, Pan YC, Soki F, Chan HL, Kripfgans O. Comprehensive peri-implant tissue evaluation with ultrasonography and cone-beam computed tomography: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021; 32 ( 7 ): 777 - 785.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper10902_am.pdf
Size:
1.831MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper10902.pdf
Size:
1021.KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.