Show simple item record

Evaluation of efficacy of antioxidant-enriched sunscreen prodcuts against long wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light

dc.contributor.authorRuvolo, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorBoothby-Shoemaker, Wyatt
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Nishant
dc.contributor.authorHamzavi, Iltefat H.
dc.contributor.authorLim, Henry W.
dc.contributor.authorKohli, Indermeet
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-05T21:02:44Z
dc.date.available2023-07-05 17:02:42en
dc.date.available2022-07-05T21:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.identifier.citationRuvolo, Eduardo; Boothby-Shoemaker, Wyatt ; Kumar, Nishant; Hamzavi, Iltefat H.; Lim, Henry W.; Kohli, Indermeet (2022). "Evaluation of efficacy of antioxidant- enriched sunscreen prodcuts against long wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light." International Journal of Cosmetic Science (3): 394-402.
dc.identifier.issn0142-5463
dc.identifier.issn1468-2494
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173006
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThe synergistic effects of VL and long wavelength UVA1 (VL + UVA1, 370–700 nm) on inducing pigmentation and erythema in skin have been demonstrated and linked to exacerbation of dermatologic conditions including melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. This study aimed to compare the photoprotection of organic sunscreens enriched with antioxidant (AO) combinations against VL + UVA1 induced biologic effects. The efficacy was compared with that offered by a commercially available tinted sunscreen.MethodsTen healthy adult subjects with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes IV–VI were enrolled (nine completed). VL + UVA1 dose of 380 J/cm2 was utilized. Assessment methods were polarized photography, investigator global scoring and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). Measurements were obtained at baseline and immediately, 24 h and 7 days after irradiation.ResultsSites treated with tinted sunscreen product had significantly less pigmentation compared with untreated but irradiated skin at all time points. However, DRS results demonstrated that the 5-AO sunscreen performed comparably or better than all sunscreens tested with relatively lower dyschromia, delayed erythema and pigmentation.ConclusionThese results highlight the potential of AO-enriched sunscreens to be photoprotective against VL + UVA1. The combination of efficacy and the cosmetic appearance of this product may provide wider acceptability which is crucial considering the limited available means of protection against this waveband.RésuméObjectifles effets synergiques de la lumière visible (LV) et des rayons ultraviolets long (UVA1) (LV + UVA1, 370 à 700 nm) sur l’induction de la pigmentation et de l’érythème cutané ont été démontrés et liés à l’exacerbation des affections dermatologiques, notamment le mélasma et l’hyperpigmentation post-inflammatoire. Cette étude visait à comparer la photoprotection des écrans solaires organiques enrichis en associations antioxydantes (AO) contre les effets biologiques induits par LV+UVA1. L’efficacité a été comparée à celle offerte par un écran solaire teinté disponible dans le commerce.Méthodesdix sujets adultes en bonne santé présentant des phototypes cutanés de Fitzpatrick IV à VI ont été inclus (neuf ont terminé l’étude). On a utilisé une dose LV+UVA1 de 380 J/cm2. Les méthodes d’évaluation étaient la photographie polarisée, le score global de l’investigateur et la spectroscopie de réflectance diffuse (DRS). Les mesures ont été obtenues immédiatement à l’entrée dans l’étude et, 24 h et 7 jours après l’irradiation.Résultatsles sites traités avec un produit de protection solaire teinté présentaient une pigmentation significativement inférieure à celle de la peau non traitée mais irradiée, à toutes les heures de mesure. Cependant, les résultats de la DRS ont démontré que l’écran solaire 5-AO fonctionnait de manière comparable ou mieux que tous les écrans solaires testés avec une dyschromie, un érythème retardé et une pigmentation relativement plus faible.Conclusionces résultats mettent en évidence le potentiel des écrans solaires enrichis en AO comme facteur de photoprotection contre LV+UVA1. La combinaison de l’efficacité et de l’aspect esthétique de ce produit peut permettre une plus grande acceptabilité, ce qui est essentiel compte tenu de la disponibilité limitée des moyens de protection contre cette gamme d’ondes.The synergistic effects of VL and long wavelength UVA1 (VL + UVA1, 370–700 nm) on inducing pigmentation and erythema in skin have been demonstrated and linked to exacerbation of dermatologic conditions including melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. This study aims to compare the photoprotection of organic sunscreens enriched with antioxidant (AO) combinations against VL + UVA1 induced biologic effects. The efficacy was compared to that offered by a commercially available tinted sunscreen.
dc.publisherStandardization, I.O.f.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othersuncare/UV protection
dc.subject.otherantioxidants
dc.subject.otherhyperpigmentation
dc.subject.othermelanogenesis
dc.subject.othervisible light
dc.titleEvaluation of efficacy of antioxidant-enriched sunscreen prodcuts against long wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDermatology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173006/1/ics12785.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173006/2/ics12785_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ics.12785
dc.identifier.sourceInternational Journal of Cosmetic Science
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyons AB, Zubair R, Kohli I, Nahhas AF, Braunberger TL, Mokhtari M, et al. Mitigating visible light and long wavelength UVA1-induced effects with topical antioxidants. Photochem Photobiol. 2021; 98 ( 2 ): 455 – 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamasubramaniam R, Roy A, Sharma B, Nagalakshmi S. Are there mechanistic differences between ultraviolet and visible radiation induced skin pigmentation? Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011; 10 ( 12 ): 1887 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRandhawa M, Seo I, Liebel F, Southall MD, Kollias N, Ruvolo E. Visible light induces melanogenesis in human skin through a photoadaptive response. PloS one. 2015; 10 ( 6 ): e0130949.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohli I, Chaowattanapanit S, Mohammad TF, Nicholson CL, Fatima S, Jacobsen G, et al. Synergistic effects of long-wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light on pigmentation and erythema. Br J Dermatol. 2018; 178 ( 5 ): 1173 – 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMann T, Eggers K, Rippke F, Tesch M, Buerger A, Darvin ME, et al. High-energy visible light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin—protective effects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone a in vitro and in vivo. Photodermatol, Photoimmunol Photomed. 2020; 36 ( 2 ): 135 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKollias N, Baqer A. An experimental study of the changes in pigmentation in human skin in vivo with visible and near infrared light. Photochem Photobiol. 1984; 39 ( 5 ): 651 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiebel F, Kaur S, Ruvolo E, Kollias N, Southall MD. Irradiation of skin with visible light induces reactive oxygen species and matrix-degrading enzymes. J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132 ( 7 ): 1901 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohli I, Zubair R, Lyons AB, Nahhas AF, Braunberger TL, Mokhtari M, et al. Impact of long-wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light on light-skinned individuals. Photochem Photobiol. 2019; 95 ( 6 ): 1285 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoutaboul C, Denis A, Vinche A. Immediate pigment darkening: description, kinetic and biological function. Eur J Dermatol. 1999; 9 ( 2 ): 95 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSklar LR, Almutawa F, Lim HW, Hamzavi I. Effects of ultraviolet radiation, visible light, and infrared radiation on erythema and pigmentation: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2013; 12 ( 1 ): 54 – 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNarla S, Kohli I, Hamzavi IH, Lim HW. Visible light in photodermatology. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020; 19 ( 1 ): 99 – 104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaye ET, Levin JA, Blank IH, Arndt KA, Anderson RR. Efficiency of opaque photoprotective agents in the visible light range. Arch Dermatol. 1991; 127 ( 3 ): 351 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartini APM, Maia Campos PM. Influence of visible light on cutaneous hyperchromias: clinical efficacy of broad-spectrum sunscreens. Photodermatol, Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018; 34 ( 4 ): 241 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEzekwe, N. Efficacy evaluation of topical sunscreens against long wavelength ultraviolet A1 and visible light induced biological effects: preliminary findings. 30th annual meeting of the Photodermatology society. Virtual. 2021.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyons AB, Trullas C, Kohli I, Hamzavi IH, Lim HW. Photoprotection beyond ultraviolet radiation: a review of tinted sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; 84 ( 5 ): 1393 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohammad TF, Kohli I, Nicholson CL, Treyger G, Chaowattanapanit S, Nahhas AF, et al. Oral polypodium leucotomos extract and its impact on visible light-induced pigmentation in human subjects. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019; 18 ( 12 ): 1198 – 203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStandardization, I.O.f. Determination of Sunscreen UVA Photoprotection In Vitro. Geneva: Standardization, I.O.f.; 2015. p. 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamatas G, Zmudzka BZ, Kollias N, Beer JZ. In vivo measurement of skin erythema and pigmentation: new means of implementation of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with a commercial instrument. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 159 ( 3 ): 683 – 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohli I, Nahhas AF, Braunberger TL, Chaowattanapanit S, Mohammad TF, Nicholson CL, et al. Spectral characteristics of visible light-induced pigmentation and visible light protection factor. Photodermatol, Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019; 35 ( 6 ): 393 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDumbuya H, Grimes PE, Lynch S, Ji K, Brahmachary M, Zheng Q, et al. Impact of iron-oxide containing formulations against visible light-induced skin pigmentation in skin of color individuals. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020; 19 ( 7 ): 712 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKühnl J, Roggenkamp D, Gehrke SA, Stäb F, Wenck H, Kolbe L, et al. Licochalcone a activates Nrf2 in vitro and contributes to licorice extract-induced lowered cutaneous oxidative stress in vivo. Exp Dermatol. 2015; 24 ( 1 ): 42 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKong S-Z, Chen HM, Yu XT, Zhang X, Feng XX, Kang XH, et al. The protective effect of 18β-Glycyrrhetinic acid against UV irradiation induced photoaging in mice. Exp Gerontol. 2015; 61: 147 – 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalaiarasi P, Pugalendi K. Protective effect of 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in experimental diabetes. J Pharm Res. 2011; 4 ( 1 ): 107 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHong M, Mahns A, Batzer J, Mann T, Gerwat W, Scherner C, et al. Glycyrrhetinic acid: a novel modulator of human skin pigmentation and DNA-repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2009; 129: S40. Nature publishing group 75 VARICK ST, 9TH FLR, new YORK, NY 10013–1917 USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin J-Y, Selim MA, Shea CR, Grichnik JM, Omar MM, Monteiro-Riviere NA, et al. UV photoprotection by combination topical antioxidants vitamin C and vitamin E. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003; 48 ( 6 ): 866 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchäfer M, Werner S. Nrf2—a regulator of keratinocyte redox signaling. Free Radical Biol Med. 2015; 88: 243 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Dormael R, Bastien P, Sextius P, Gueniche A, Ye D, Tran C, et al. Vitamin C prevents ultraviolet-induced pigmentation in healthy volunteers: Bayesian meta-analysis results from 31 randomized controlled versus vehicle clinical studies. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2019; 12 ( 2 ): E53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMahmoud BH, Ruvolo E, Hexsel CL, Liu Y, Owen MR, Kollias N, et al. Impact of long-wavelength UVA and visible light on melanocompetent skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2010; 130 ( 8 ): 2092 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePorges S, Kaidbey K, Grove G. Quantification of visible light-induced melanogenesis in human skin. Photo-dermatology. 1988; 5 ( 5 ): 197 – 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuteil L, Cardot-Leccia N, Queille-Roussel C, Maubert Y, Harmelin Y, Boukari F, et al. Differences in visible light-induced pigmentation according to wavelengths: a clinical and histological study in comparison with UVB exposure. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014; 27 ( 5 ): 822 – 6.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.