Show simple item record

Fecal microbiota transplant improves cognition in hepatic encephalopathy and its effect varies by donor and recipient

dc.contributor.authorBloom, Patricia P.
dc.contributor.authorDonlan, John
dc.contributor.authorTorres Soto, Mariam
dc.contributor.authorDaidone, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHohmann, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorChung, Raymond T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T18:56:24Z
dc.date.available2023-09-02 14:56:21en
dc.date.available2022-08-02T18:56:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-08
dc.identifier.citationBloom, Patricia P.; Donlan, John; Torres Soto, Mariam; Daidone, Michael; Hohmann, Elizabeth; Chung, Raymond T. (2022). "Fecal microbiota transplant improves cognition in hepatic encephalopathy and its effect varies by donor and recipient." Hepatology Communications (8): 2079-2089.
dc.identifier.issn2471-254X
dc.identifier.issn2471-254X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173086
dc.description.abstractEarly data suggest fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) may treat hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Optimal FMT donor and recipient characteristics are unknown. We assessed the safety and efficacy of FMT in patients with prior overt HE, comparing five FMT donors. We performed an open-label study of FMT capsules, administered 5 times over 3 weeks. Primary outcomes were change in psychometric HE score (PHES) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Serial stool samples underwent shallow shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Ten patients completed FMT administration and 6-month follow-up. Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score did not change after FMT (14 versus 14, p = 0.51). Thirteen minor adverse events and three serious adverse events (two unrelated to FMT) were reported. One SAE was extended-spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli bacteremia. The PHES improved after three doses of FMT (+2.1, p < 0.05), after five doses of FMT (+2.9, p = 0.007), and 4 weeks after the fifth dose of FMT (+3.1, p = 0.02). Mean change in the PHES ranged from −1 to +6 by donor. Two taxa were identified by random forest analysis and confirmed by linear regression to predict the PHES— Bifidobacterium adolescentis (adjusted R2 = 0.27) and B. angulatum (adjusted R2 = 0.25)—both short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers. Patients who responded to FMT had higher levels of Bifidobacterium as well as other known beneficial taxa at baseline and throughout the study. The FMT donor with poorest cognitive outcomes in recipients had the lowest fecal SCFA levels. Conclusion: FMT capsules improved cognition in HE, with an effect varying by donor and recipient factors (NCT03420482).In this trial, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from multiple different donors were used to treat hepatic encephalopathy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate FMT donor and recipient characteristics that influence response to therapy.
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleFecal microbiota transplant improves cognition in hepatic encephalopathy and its effect varies by donor and recipient
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173086/1/hep41950-sup-0010-FigS10.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173086/2/hep41950-sup-0009-FigS9.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173086/3/hep41950_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173086/4/hep41950-sup-0008-FigS8.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173086/5/hep41950.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hep4.1950
dc.identifier.sourceHepatology Communications
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarcella C, Cui B, Kelly CR, Ianiro G, Cammarota G, Zhang F. Systematic review: the global incidence of faecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events from 2000 to 2020. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 53: 33 – 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKursa M, Rudnicki W. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 2010; 36: 1 – 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoster E, Lakin SM, Dean CJ, Wolfe C, Young JG, Boucher C, et al. MEGARes 2.0: a database for classification of antimicrobial drug, biocide and metal resistance determinants in metagenomic sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48: D561 – D569.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung CM, Lin Y-F, Chen K-F, Ke H-M, Huang H-Y, Gong Y-N, et al. Predicting clinical outcomes of cirrhosis patients with hepatic encephalopathy from the fecal microbiome. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 8: 301 – 318.e2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Fagan A, Sikaroodi M, White MB, Sterling RK, Gilles H, et al. Liver transplant modulates gut microbial dysbiosis and cognitive function in cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2017; 23: 907 – 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhang Z, Zhai H, Geng J, Yu R, Ren H, Fan H, et al. Large-scale survey of gut microbiota associated with MHE Via 16S rRNA-based pyrosequencing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108: 1601 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Ridlon JM, Hylemon PB, Thacker LR, Heuman DM, Smith S, et al. Linkage of gut microbiome with cognition in hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Physiol-Gastrointestinal Liver Physiol. 2012; 302: G168 – G175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, O’Leary JG, Tandon P, Wong F, Kamath PS, Biggins SW, et al. Targets to improve quality of care for patients with hepatic encephalopathy: data from a multi-centre cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 49: 1518 – 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZellmer C, Sater MRA, Huntley MH, Osman M, Olesen SW, Ramakrishna B. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli transmission via fecal microbiota transplant. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 72: e876-80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheng YW, Alhaffar D, Saha S, Khanna S, Bohm M, Phelps E, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation is safe and effective in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection and cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 19: 1627 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIaniro G, Mullish BH, Kelly CR, Kassam Z, Kuijper EJ, Ng SC, et al. Reorganisation of faecal microbiota transplant services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gut. 2020; 69: 1555 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlesen SW. Fecal microbiota transplantation “donor effects” are not clinically relevant for Clostridioides difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 2635 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlesen SW, Gerardin Y. Re-evaluating the evidence for faecal microbiota transplantation ’super-donors’ in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2021; 15: 453 – 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodhouse CA, Patel VC, Singanayagam A, Shawcross DL. Review article: the gut microbiome as a therapeutic target in the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 47: 192 – 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlesen SW. Power calculations for detecting differences in efficacy of fecal microbiota donors. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020; 20: 100674.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanne C, Rolhion N, Sokol H. Recipient factors in faecal microbiota transplantation: one stool does not fit all. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 18: 503 – 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelenguer A, Duncan SH, Calder AG, Holtrop G, Louis P, Lobley GE, et al. Two routes of metabolic cross-feeding between Bifidobacterium adolescentis and butyrate-producing anaerobes from the human gut. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72: 3593 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JL, Liu G, Darby TM, Fernandes LM, Diaz-Hernandez ME, Jones RM, et al. Bifidobacterium adolescentis supplementation attenuates fracture-induced systemic sequelae. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020; 132: 110831.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi Y, Lv L, Ye J, Fang D, Shi D, Wu W, et al. Bifidobacterium adolescentis CGMCC 15058 alleviates liver injury, enhances the intestinal barrier and modifies the gut microbiota in D-galactosamine-treated rats. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019; 103: 375 – 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalony G, Calmeyn T, Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Coculture fermentations of Bifidobacterium species and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron reveal a mechanistic insight into the prebiotic effect of inulin-type fructans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75: 2312 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel VC, Williams R. Antimicrobial resistance in chronic liver disease. Hepatol Int. 2020; 14: 24 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Shamsaddini A, Fagan A, Sterling RK, Gavis E, Khoruts A, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant in cirrhosis reduces gut microbial antibiotic resistance genes: analysis of two trials. Hepatol Commun. 2021; 5: 258 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, O’Leary JG, Tandon P, Wong F, Garcia-Tsao G, Kamath PS, et al. Hepatic encephalopathy is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis independent of other extrahepatic organ failures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15: 565 – 574.e4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabiee A, Ximenes RO, Nikayin S, Hickner A, Juthani P, Rosen RH, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review. Liver Int. 2021; 41: 6 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTapper EB, Aberasturi D, Zhao Z, Hsu CY, Parikh ND. Outcomes after hepatic encephalopathy in population-based cohorts of patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 51: 1397 – 405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGluud LL, Vilstrup H, Morgan MY. Non-absorbable disaccharides versus placebo/no intervention and lactulose versus lactitol for the prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2016 ( 5 ): Cd003044.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Khoruts A. Microbiota changes and intestinal microbiota transplantation in liver diseases and cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2020; 72: 1003 – 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom P, Tapper EB, Young VB, Lok AS. Microbiome therapeutics for hepatic encephalopathy. J Hepatol. 2021; 75: 1452 – 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly CR, Yen EF, Grinspan AM, Kahn SA, Atreja A, Lewis JD, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation is highly effective in real-world practice: initial results from the FMT national registry. Gastroenterology. 2021; 160: 183 – 192.e3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Kassam Z, Fagan A, Gavis EA, Liu E, Cox IJ, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant from a rational stool donor improves hepatic encephalopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Hepatology. 2017; 66: 1727 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Salzman NH, Acharya C, Sterling RK, White MB, Gavis EA, et al. Fecal microbial transplant capsules are safe in hepatic encephalopathy: a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. 2019; 70: 1690 – 703. Erratum in: Hepatology. 2020;72:1501.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePringle PL, Soto MT, Chung RT, Hohmann E. Patients with cirrhosis require more fecal microbiota capsules to cure refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 791 – 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeFilipp Z, Bloom PP, Torres Soto M, Mansour MK, Sater MRA, Huntley MH, et al. Drug-resistant E. coli bacteremia transmitted by fecal microbiota transplant. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 2043 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoungster I, Sauk J, Pindar C, Wilson RG, Kaplan JL, Smith MB, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection using a frozen inoculum from unrelated donors: a randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58: 1515 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoungster I, Mahabamunuge J, Systrom HK, Sauk J, Khalili H, Levin J, et al. Oral, frozen fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) capsules for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. BMC Med. 2016; 14: 134.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuerit J-M, Amantini A, Fischer C, Kaplan PW, Mecarelli O, Schnitzler A, et al.; Members of the ISHEN Commission on Neurophysiological Investigations. Neurophysiological investigations of hepatic encephalopathy: ISHEN practice guidelines. Liver Int. 2009; 29: 789 – 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRandolph C, Hilsabeck R, Kato A, Kharbanda P, Li Y-Y, Mapelli D, et al.; International Society for Hepatic Encephalopathy and Nitrogen Metabolism (ISHEN). Neuropsychological assessment of hepatic encephalopathy: ISHEN practice guidelines. Liver Int. 2009; 29: 629 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmodio P, Montagnese S. Clinical neurophysiology of hepatic encephalopathy. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015; 5 ( Suppl 1 ): S60 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBajaj JS, Thacker LR, Heuman DM, Fuchs M, Sterling RK, Sanyal AJ, et al. The Stroop smartphone application is a short and valid method to screen for minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2013; 58: 1122 – 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillmann B, Al-Ghalith GA, Shields-Cutler RR, Zhu Q, Knight R, Knights D. SHOGUN: a modular, accurate and scalable framework for microbiome quantification. Bioinformatics. 2020; 36: 4088 – 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLa Rosa PS, Brooks JP, Deych E, Boone EL, Edwards DJ, Wang Q, et al. Hypothesis testing and power calculations for taxonomic-based human microbiome data. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e52078.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLegendre P, Legendre L. Numerical ecology. 3 rd English ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.