Show simple item record

Changing patterns of the prevalence of burnout and secondary traumatic stress in health-system pharmacists throughout the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.authorMohammad, Rima A.
dc.contributor.authorJones, Adam M.
dc.contributor.authorClark, John S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T18:56:49Z
dc.date.available2023-08-02 14:56:48en
dc.date.available2022-08-02T18:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-07
dc.identifier.citationMohammad, Rima A.; Jones, Adam M.; Clark, John S. (2022). "Changing patterns of the prevalence of burnout and secondary traumatic stress in health-system pharmacists throughout the COVID-19 pandemic." Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy 5(7): 674-681.
dc.identifier.issn2574-9870
dc.identifier.issn2574-9870
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173097
dc.description.abstractIntroductionThe demands posed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have led to greater stress and frustration, which in turn can fuel exhaustion, cynicism, secondary traumatic stress (STS), and burnout. More evidence is needed regarding the prevalence of burnout and STS throughout the pandemic.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the changing pattern of the prevalence of burnout and STS in health-system pharmacists throughout the pandemic (early to 20 months into the pandemic).MethodsA cross-sectional, listserv-based online survey was conducted in health-system pharmacists. The survey was administered between April and May 2020 (early group) and again between October and December 2021 (20-month group). The survey questionnaire included demographics, employment characteristics, COVID-19-related questions, survey of respondent’s perceptions of prevalence and severity of burnout, and Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) which assessed compassion satisfaction and fatigue (burnout and STS).ResultsA total of 1126 health-system pharmacists completed the survey (484 in the early group and 642 in the 20-month group). Based on respondents’ self-rating of burnout, significantly more respondents reported feeling burned out in the 20-month group vs the early group (69% vs 47.7%; P < .001). Based on ProQOL, significantly more respondents were identified with moderate–high likelihood of burnout (83.8% vs 65.3%; P < .001) and moderate–high probability of STS (63.2% vs 51.4%; P < .001) in the 20-month group vs the early group. Approximately 99% of respondents in both groups were identified with moderate–high probability of compassion satisfaction.ConclusionTwenty months into the COVID-19 pandemic, almost 83% of health-system pharmacist respondents were identified with burnout, 63% with STS, and 99% with compassion satisfaction. These rates are significantly higher compared with rates early in the pandemic. Unfortunately, the development of burnout and STS in these pharmacists may lead to several work-related consequences (eg, increase risk of medical errors); therefore, further studies are critical to develop and assess effective interventions to address the long-term effects of the pandemic and well-being of health-system pharmacists.
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.
dc.subject.otherCOVID-19
dc.subject.othercoronavirus
dc.subject.othercompassion
dc.subject.otherburnout
dc.subject.otherProQOL
dc.subject.otherpharmacists
dc.subject.othertrauma
dc.subject.otherstress
dc.titleChanging patterns of the prevalence of burnout and secondary traumatic stress in health-system pharmacists throughout the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173097/1/jac51632_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173097/2/jac51632.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jac5.1632
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAn interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20 ( 5 ): 533 – 534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenter for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). COVID-19 dashboard. Available from: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Last Accessed: January 21, 2022.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMensinger JL, Brom H, Havens DS, et al. Psychological responses of hospital-based nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A cross-sectional study. Appl Nurs Res. 2022; 63: 151517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151517.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatsuo T, Kobayashi D, Taki F, et al. Prevalence of health care worker burnout during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Japan. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3 ( 8 ): e2017271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen R, Sun C, Chen JJ, et al. A large-scale survey on trauma, burnout, and posttraumatic growth among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020; 30: 102 – 116. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12796.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoseinabadi TS, Kakhki S, Teimori G, et al. Burnout and its influencing factors between frontline nurses and nurses from other wards during the outbreak of coronavirus disease -COVID-19- in Iran. Invest Educ Enferm. 2020; 38 ( 2 ): e3. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v38n2e03.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuceno-Moreno L, Talavera-Velasco B, Garcia-Albuerne Y, et al. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, levels of resilience and burnout in Spanish health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17 ( 15 ): 5514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu D, Kong Y, Li W, et al. Frontline nurses’ burnout, anxiety, depression, and fear statuses and their associated factors during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China: A large-scale cross-sectional study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 27 ( 24 ): 100424.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKannampallil TG, Goss CW, Evanoff BA, Strickland JR, McAlister RP, Duncan J. Exposure to COVID-19 patients increases physician trainee stress and burnout. PLoS One. 2020; 15 ( 8 ): e0237301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Wert MJ, Gandhi S, Gupta I, et al. Healthcare worker mental health after the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic: A US medical center cross-sectional survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 37 ( 5 ): 1169 – 1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07251-0.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Center for Victims of Torture. Available from: https://www.cvt.org/. Last Accessed: 2022 January 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamm BH. The concise ProQOL manual. 2nd ed. Available from: https://proqol.org/uploads/ProQOLManual.pdf. Last Accessed: 2022 January 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohland BM, Kruse GR, Rohrer JE. Validation of a single-item measure of burnout against the Maslach burnout inventory among physicians. Stress Health. 2004; 20: 75 – 79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBakken BK, Winn AN. Clinician burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccine administration. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003; 61 ( 5 ): e71 – e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston K, O’Reilly CL, Scholz B, et al. Burnout and the challenges facing pharmacists during COVID-19: Results of a national survey. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021; 43 ( 3 ): 716 – 725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01268-5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones AM, Clark JS, Mohammad RA. Burnout and secondary traumatic stress in health-system pharmacists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2021; 78 ( 9 ): 818 – 824. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxab051.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasad K, McLoughlin C, Stillman M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of stress and burnout among U.S. healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey study. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 35: 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100879.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCocker F, Joss N. Compassion fatigue among healthcare, emergency and community service workers: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13 ( 6 ): 618.
dc.working.doiNOen
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.