Show simple item record

VIO: ontology classification and study of vaccine responses given various experimental and analytical conditions

dc.contributor.authorOng, Edison
dc.contributor.authorSun, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBerke, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Jie
dc.contributor.authorWu, Guanming
dc.contributor.authorHe, Yongqun
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T17:58:45Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T17:58:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-23
dc.identifier.citationBMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Dec 23;20(Suppl 21):704
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3194-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173428en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Different human responses to the same vaccine were frequently observed. For example, independent studies identified overlapping but different transcriptomic gene expression profiles in Yellow Fever vaccine 17D (YF-17D) immunized human subjects. Different experimental and analysis conditions were likely contributed to the observed differences. To investigate this issue, we developed a Vaccine Investigation Ontology (VIO), and applied VIO to classify the different variables and relations among these variables systematically. We then evaluated whether the ontological VIO modeling and VIO-based statistical analysis would contribute to the enhanced vaccine investigation studies and a better understanding of vaccine response mechanisms. Results Our VIO modeling identified many variables related to data processing and analysis such as normalization method, cut-off criteria, software settings including software version. The datasets from two previous studies on human responses to YF-17D vaccine, reported by Gaucher et al. (2008) and Querec et al. (2009), were re-analyzed. We first applied the same LIMMA statistical method to re-analyze the Gaucher data set and identified a big difference in terms of significantly differentiated gene lists compared to the original study. The different results were likely due to the LIMMA version and software package differences. Our second study re-analyzed both Gaucher and Querec data sets but with the same data processing and analysis pipeline. Significant differences in differential gene lists were also identified. In both studies, we found that Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment results had more overlapping than the gene lists and enriched pathway lists. The visualization of the identified GO hierarchical structures among the enriched GO terms and their associated ancestor terms using GOfox allowed us to find more associations among enriched but often different GO terms, demonstrating the usage of GO hierarchical relations enhance data analysis. Conclusions The ontology-based analysis framework supports standardized representation, integration, and analysis of heterogeneous data of host responses to vaccines. Our study also showed that differences in specific variables might explain different results drawn from similar studies.
dc.titleVIO: ontology classification and study of vaccine responses given various experimental and analytical conditions
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173428/1/12859_2019_Article_3194.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5159
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T17:58:45Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.